Contemporary approaches to Generative syntax lead to the expectation that WH in situ would be subject to few distributional restrictions; but a series of complex constraints apply to in-situ WH in subject position in Standard Indonesian. We argue that this distribution does not follow from principles of formal grammar, but rather from a constraint on the relationship between syntax and information structure.
We then turn to Colloquial Jakarta Indonesian, a variety similar to Standard Indonesian with regard to grammatical restrictions on WH in situ, but lacking the constraint on the relationship between syntax and information structure found in Standard Indonesian. We contend that the seeming differences between the grammars of Standard Indonesian and Jakarta Indonesian do not reflect differences in grammar in the narrow sense but rather in how the dialects relate to formal grammar and pragmatics.
2016. Restrictions on wh-in situ in Kavalan and Amis. Lingua 169 ► pp. 42 ff.
Willson-Sturman, Heather
2014. Pseudocleft constructions in Marshallese wh- questions. Lingua 145 ► pp. 1 ff.
LEEJUYOUNG
2013. An Education in Indonesian Passive Construction Based on Typological Characteristics.. Studies in Foreign Language Education 27:2 ► pp. 87 ff.
LEEJUYOUNG
2018. Metode Pengajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Perguruan Tinggi: Berdasarkan Perubahan Tipologis. Studies in Foreign Language Education 32:3 ► pp. 57 ff.
Cinque, Guglielmo
2009. The Fundamental Left-Right Asymmetry of Natural Languages. In Universals of Language Today [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 76], ► pp. 165 ff.
Potsdam, Eric
2009. Austronesian verb-initial languages and wh-question strategies. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27:4 ► pp. 737 ff.
Chung, Sandra
2008. Indonesian clause structure from an Austronesian perspective. Lingua 118:10 ► pp. 1554 ff.
Polinsky, Maria & Eric Potsdam
2008. The syntax and semantics of wanting in Indonesian. Lingua 118:10 ► pp. 1617 ff.
A. Fox, Barbara
2007. Principles shaping grammatical practices: an exploration. Discourse Studies 9:3 ► pp. 299 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.