Recent work on the relationship between lexicalization and grammaticalization appears to yield a consensus compatible with traditional notions of gestalt linguistics. A survey of the literature indicates the complexity of this supposed dichotomy, and provides a starting point from which we may evaluate a diagrammatic approach to the problem. Examples focus on the German derivational suffix -heit, cognate with English -hood. Such suffixation has traditionally been difficult for scholars to assess in terms of lexicality and grammaticality. Taking the gestalt concepts of parts and wholes into account, the inherent flexibility and fluidity between lexicalization and grammaticalization becomes apparent.
2006. À propos de la relation entre la grammaticalisation et la lexicalisation : le cas du verbe cita en coréen1. Cahiers de praxématique :46 ► pp. 141 ff.
Operstein, Natalie
2024. Grammar and grammaticalization in Zapotec. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 77:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Pierce, Marc
2009. Laurel J. Brinton and Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Lexicalization and Language Change. The Linguistic Review 26:1
Prévost, Sophie & Benjamin Fagard
2007. Grammaticalisation et lexicalisation : la formation d'expressions complexes. Langue française n° 156:4 ► pp. 3 ff.
Schoonjans, Steven
2012. The particulization of German complement-taking mental predicates. Journal of Pragmatics 44:6-7 ► pp. 776 ff.
2008. A constructional approach to lexicalization processes in the history of English: Evidence from possessive constructions. Word Structure 1:2 ► pp. 156 ff.
Van Goethem, Kristel & Philippe Hiligsmann
2014. When Two Paths Converge: Debonding and Clipping of DutchReuze. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
[no author supplied]
2011. References. In Dialectology as Dialectic, ► pp. 460 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.