An obstacle to the morphologization of postpositions
This article investigates the morphologization of postpositions and presents structural properties of Turkish postpositions and their frequency of occurrence. Turkish postpositional phrases provide chunks comprised of a frequently co-occurring case suffix on the complement followed by a postposition. According to the Linear Fusion Hypothesis (Bybee 2002), such chunks provide ideal conditions for phonological fusion. In contrast to this view, this paper shows that there is no fusion between the frequently co-occurring case suffixes and postpositions. Instead, postpositions following an uninflected form of complement have a greater chance of turning into case suffixes or clitics than those following a case-inflected form. Case suffixes serve as constant indicators of a word boundary before postpositions, thereby blocking the bonding between the postposition and the complement. Simple frequency and linearity, therefore, cannot be the sole conditions in the morphologization of postpositions.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Zingler, Tim
2018.
Reduction without fusion: Grammaticalization and wordhood in Turkish.
Folia Linguistica 52:2
► pp. 415 ff.
Ишутина, Наталия, Ishutina, Nataliya, Гориков, Игорь, Gorikov, Igor, Сомова, Лариса, Somova, Larisa, Андриевская, Ирина & Andrievskaya, Irina
2018.
MORPHOLOGIC CONDITION OF THE LIVER IN NEWBORNS WITH INBORN CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTION.
Bulletin physiology and pathology of respiration 1:67
► pp. 60 ff.
Kabak, Bariş & René Schiering
2006.
The Phonology and Morphology of Function Word Contractions in German.
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 9:1
► pp. 53 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.