Review published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 30:1 (2006) ► pp.179–183
Book review
. Implicatures in Discourse. The Case of Spanish NP Anaphora. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Co., 2003. . [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 105]. xv + 297 pp.
Reviewed by
References (11)
Büring, Daniel. (2004). The syntax and semantics of binding theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, Richard (1997) “Accessibility theory in a variable syntax of Spanish” Journal of Pragmatics 281, 29–67. 
Chafe, Wallace (ed.) (1980) The pear stories. Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Chomsky, Noam. (1982). Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Fernández Ordóñez, Inés (1999) “Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo”. In I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española. Vol. 11: 1317–1397. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier (2002) “Demonstratives in context.” In Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.), From words to discourse. Trends in Spanish semantics and pragmatics, 195–236. Oxford/New York: Elsevier Science.
(2003) “Constraint interaction at the semantics/pragmatics interface: the case of clitic doubling.” In K. M. Jaszczolt and K. Turner (eds.) Meanings in contrast: The Cambridge papers, 335–354. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Horn, Laurence (1984) “Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: q-based and r-based implicature”. In D. Schiffrin (ed.) Meaning, form and use in context. linguistic applications, 11–42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Huang, Yan (1991) “A Neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora” Journal of Linguistics 271, 301–335.
Levinson, Stephen. (2000). Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Sperber, Daniel and Deirdre Wilson. (1986/1995) Relevance theory: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.