Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 32:1 (2008) ► pp.219–227
Book review

Eric Fuß. The Rise of Agreement. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2005. . [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 71]. xii+335 pp. ISBN 90 272 2805 1

Reviewed by
| Northwestern University
Published online: 15 January 2008
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.32.1.12cla
References (35)
References
Andrews, Avery. 1990. Unification and morphological blocking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 81: 507–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batllori, Montserrat, Maria-Lluïsa Hernanz, Carme Picallo, & Francesc Roca (eds.). 2005. Grammaticalization and parametric variation. Oxford: OUP.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Explaining morphosyntactic competition. The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), 1–44. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. The handbook of historical linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda, (eds.), 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 2004. Historical linguistics: An introduction (2nd edn). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001a. Derivation by phase. Ken Hale: A life in language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001b. Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 201: 1–28. Cambridge MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.Google Scholar
Clark, Robin & Ian Roberts. 1993. A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 241: 299–345.Google Scholar
Embick, David. 1997. Voice and the interfaces of syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Embick, David & Alec Marantz. 2006. Architecture and blocking. Submitted.
Garrett, Andrew. In press. Syntactic change as language change. Proceedings of the Eighth Diachronic Generative Syntax Conference, Steven Anderson & Dianne Jonas (eds.).
van Gelderen, Elly. 2004. Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & S. Jay Keyser (eds.), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1990. An approach to morphology. NELS 20:1, 150–184. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: CUP.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: OUP.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. The handbook of historical linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization (2nd edn). Cambridge: CUP.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson Kam, Carla L. & Elissa L. Newport. 2005. Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development 11: 151–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans. 2000. Jespersen’s Cycle Revisited: Formal Properties of Grammaticalization. Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, Susan Pintzuk; George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds.), 51–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2005. Blocking and periphrasis in inflectional paradigms. Yearbook of Morphology 2004: 113–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. In press. Grammaticalization as optimization. Stanford University. DOI logo
Kirby, Simon. 1999. Function, selection and innateness. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1988. On the function of agreement. Agreement in Natural Language, Michael Barlow & Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), 55–65. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Noyer, Rolf. 1997. Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 1999. A formal approach to ‘grammaticalization’. Linguistics 371: 1011–1041. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabor, Whitney & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1998. Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. The limits of grammaticalization, Anna Gicalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), 229–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Constructions in grammaticalization. The handbook of historical linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasow, Thomas. 2002. Postverbal Behavior. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Wonnacott, Elizabeth & Elissa L. Newport. 2005. Novelty and regularization: The effect of novel instances on rule formation. BUCLD 29: Proceedings of the 29th annual Boston university conference on language development, A. Brugos, M. R. Clark-Cotton & S. Ha, (eds.). Somerville MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar