Late Archaic Chinese is a precategorial language, i.e., a language whose lexical items are not preclassified in the lexicon for the syntactic functions of N and V. This will be shown on the basis of structural-conceptual criteria as those developed by Croft (2000) and Sasse (1993b) as well as on the basis of methodological criteria as those suggested by Evans & Osada (2005). As is claimed in Construction Grammar (Goldberg 1995, 2005), the meaning of lexical items is derived by integrating their own lexical meaning with the meaning contributed by the construction. The construction analysed in this paper is the argument structure construction. Linking between lexicon and syntax is subject to stereotypical pragmatic implicatures (Levinson 2000) that follow a version of the animacy hierarchy. As it will turn out, Late Archaic Chinese does not strictly lack parts of speech. In fact, without the distinction of nouns and verbs at the level of syntax it would not be possible to analyse utterances in Late Archaic Chinese. The only thing that Late Archaic Chinese can do without is noun/verb distinction in the lexicon. This typologically remarkable property is due to a process of morphological change. If such a historical process can take place irrespective of parts-of-speech distinctions, precategoriality in the lexicon cannot be a robust universal feature even if most theoretical approaches take it for granted.
2022. Review of Linlin Sun ‘Flexibility in the parts-of-speech system of classical Chinese’. Linguistic Typology 26:3 ► pp. 671 ff.
Jacques, Guillaume
2022. On the nature of morphological alternations in Archaic Chinese and their relevance to morphosyntax. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 85:3 ► pp. 475 ff.
Alfieri, Luca
2020. The lexicalization of the adjective class as an innovative feature in the Indo-European family. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 56:3 ► pp. 379 ff.
Szeto, Pui Yiu, Umberto Ansaldo & Stephen Matthews
2018. Typological variation across Mandarin dialects: An areal perspective with a quantitative approach. Linguistic Typology 22:2 ► pp. 233 ff.
Van Hoey, Thomas
2018. Does the Thunder Roll? Mandarin Chinese Meteorological Expressions and Their Iconicity. Cognitive Semantics 4:2 ► pp. 230 ff.
Arbib, Michael A.
2017. Dorsal and ventral streams in the evolution of the language-ready brain: Linking language to the world. Journal of Neurolinguistics 43 ► pp. 228 ff.
Wang, Luming, Matthias Schlesewsky, Markus Philipp & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2012. The Role of Animacy in Online Argument Interpretation in Mandarin Chinese. In Case, Word Order and Prominence [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 40], ► pp. 91 ff.
Ansaldo, Umberto
2010. Surpass comparatives in Sinitic and beyond: typology and grammaticalization. Linguistics 48:4
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.