O’Grady, Gerard
2024.
Theme in spoken language: when a tone group is not a clause.
Journal of World Languages 10:1
► pp. 76 ff.
Ioanesyan, E. R.
2023.
Appellative Constructions with Epistemic Modality Predicates.
Nauchnyi dialog 12:5
► pp. 55 ff.
Staps, Camil & Johan Rooryck
2023.
The interpretation of [+distal] in demonstratives and complementizers.
Linguistics 61:5
► pp. 1195 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth
2023.
Context in Historical Linguistics. In
The Cambridge Handbook of Language in Context,
► pp. 49 ff.
Westra, Evan
2023.
Symbolic belief in social cognition.
Philosophical Perspectives 37:1
► pp. 388 ff.
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2022.
On the evolution of a multifunctional discourse marker: A Discourse Grammar analysis of Korean com.
Journal of Pragmatics 195
► pp. 31 ff.
De Cristofaro, Elisa, Claudia Crocco, Linda Badan & Koen Plevoets
2022.
Discourse markers and turn-planning at the pragmatics–prosody interface: The case of allora in spoken Italian.
Journal of Pragmatics 198
► pp. 125 ff.
Hundt, Marianne & Rahel Oppliger
Kojadinović, Zlatan
2022.
Variation in the prosody of illocutionary adverbs.
Open Linguistics 8:1
► pp. 593 ff.
Magistro, Giuseppe, Claudia Crocco & Anne Breitbarth
Crible, Ludivine & Liesbeth Degand
2021.
Co-occurrence and ordering of discourse markers in sequences: A multifactorial study in spoken French.
Journal of Pragmatics 177
► pp. 18 ff.
Degand, Liesbeth & Ludivine Crible
Igor Douven
2021.
Lotteries, Knowledge, and Rational Belief,
Shan, Yi
2021.
Investigating the Interaction Between Prosody and Pragmatics Quantitatively: A Case Study of the Chinese Discourse Marker ni zhidao (“You Know”).
Frontiers in Psychology 12
Shan, Yi
2023.
Form (Prosody)-Meaning (Pragmatics) pairings of discourse markers: A case study of Nǐ zhīdào (‘You Know’) as a construction in Chinese media interviews.
Language & Communication 93
► pp. 136 ff.
Zinken, Jörg
2020.
The Comparative Study of Social Action: What You Must and What You Can Do to Align with a Prior Speaker.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:4
► pp. 443 ff.
Кустова, Г.И., Kustova, G.I., Н.Б. Швелидзе & N.B. Shvelidze
2020.
Системные свойства апеллятивных вводных конструкций (по данным Национального корпуса русского языка).
Научно-техническая информация. Серия 2: Информационные процессы и системы :9
► pp. 27 ff.
Freeman, Valerie
2019.
Prosodic features of stances in conversation.
Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 10:1
Nuyts, Jan & Karolien Janssens
2019.
Parentheticals revisited: The case of Dutchdenken.
Folia Linguistica 53:s40-s2
► pp. 475 ff.
Tompkins, Virginia, M. Jeffrey Farrar & Derek E. Montgomery
2019.
Speaking Your Mind: Language and Narrative in Young Children's Theory of Mind Development [
Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 56],
► pp. 109 ff.
Mantlik, Annette & Hans-Jörg Schmid
Tantucci, Vittorio & Aiqing Wang
2018.
Illocutional concurrences: The case of evaluative speech acts and face-work in spoken Mandarin and American English.
Journal of Pragmatics 138
► pp. 60 ff.
Zhao, Lucy, Nicole Dehé & Victoria A. Murphy
2018.
From pitch to purpose: The prosodic–pragmatic mapping of [I + verb] belief constructions in English and Mandarin.
Journal of Pragmatics 123
► pp. 57 ff.
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long
2017.
Cooptation as a discourse strategy.
Linguistics 55:4
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2017.
Two Challenges for ‘Neo-Sassurean’ Approaches to Morphosyntax. In
Formal Models in the Study of Language,
► pp. 49 ff.
Hanote, Sylvie & Jeanne Vigneron-Bosbach
2016.
Genre, like, so : du micro- au macro- et vice versa.
Modèles linguistiques XXXVII:73
► pp. 77 ff.
Haselow, Alexander
2016.
A processual view on grammar: macrogrammar and the final field in spoken syntax.
Language Sciences 54
► pp. 77 ff.
Lohmann, Arne & Christian Koops
Põldvere, Nele, Matteo Fuoli & Carita Paradis
2016.
A study of dialogic expansion and contraction in spoken discourse using corpus and experimental techniques.
Corpora 11:2
► pp. 191 ff.
Shank, Christopher, Julie Van Bogaert & Koen Plevoets
2016.
The diachronic development of zero complementation: A multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with think, suppose, and believe.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12:1
Shank, Christopher, Koen Plevoets & Julie Van Bogaert
이지원
2016.
An Analysis of Lengthened Reactive Tokens in Mandarin conversation: Focusing on Koreans Speaking Chinese.
Discourse and Cognition 23:4
► pp. 87 ff.
Gonen, Einat, Zohar Livnat & Noam Amir
2015.
The discourse marker axshav (‘now’) in spontaneous spoken Hebrew: Discursive and prosodic features.
Journal of Pragmatics 89
► pp. 69 ff.
HANOTE, Sylvie
2015.
Discours direct : syntaxe et prosodie.
E-rea :12.2
HANOTE, Sylvie
2019.
Le discours rapporté dans un corpus d’anglais oral : formes et frontières.
E-rea :17.1
Koops, Christian & Arne Lohmann
Maschler, Yael & Deborah Schiffrin
2015.
Discourse MarkersLanguage, Meaning, and Context. In
The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 189 ff.
TANTUCCI, VITTORIO
2015.
Epistemic inclination and factualization: a synchronic and diachronic study on the semantic gradience of factuality.
Language and Cognition 7:3
► pp. 371 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2015.
Investigating “periphery” from a functionalist perspective.
Linguistics Vanguard 1:1
► pp. 119 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2020.
The development of “digressive” discourse-topic shift markers in English.
Journal of Pragmatics 156
► pp. 121 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Shelley Staples
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
2014.
(Inter)subjectification in a functional theory of grammaticalization.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 46:1
► pp. 7 ff.
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
2021.
Complement-taking predicates, parentheticals and grammaticalization.
Language Sciences 88
► pp. 101416 ff.
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
Matić, Dejan, Rik van Gijn & Robert D. van Valin Jr.
Travis, Catherine E. & Rena Torres Cacoullos
2014.
Stress onI.
Studies in Language 38:2
► pp. 360 ff.
Bolly, Catherine
2009.
Constructionalisation et structure informationnelle. Quand la grammaticalisation ne suffit pas pour expliquer tu vois.
Linx :61
► pp. 103 ff.
Bolly, Catherine
2010.
Flou phraséologique, quasi-grammaticalisation et pseudo marqueurs de discours : un no man’s land entre syntaxe et discours ?.
Linx :62-63
► pp. 11 ff.
BOLLY, CATHERINE
2012.
Du verbe de perception visuelle au marqueur parenthétique ‘tu vois’: Grammaticalisation et changement linguistique.
Journal of French Language Studies 22:2
► pp. 143 ff.
[no author supplied]
2015.
Éric Mélac, L’évidentialité en anglais : approche contrastive à partir d’un corpus anglais-tibétain.
Études mongoles et sibériennes, centrasiatiques et tibétaines 46
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.