Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 34:1 (2010) ► pp.205211
References
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman, Essex.Google Scholar
Blakemore, D.
2006Divisions of Labour: the analysis of parentheticals. Lingua. 1161:1670–1687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, N.
1998Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston. Collins, P. & D. Lee (eds.), 33–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Espinal, M.
1991The Representation of disjunct constituents. Language. 671: 726–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegemann, L.
1988Parenthetical adverbials: the radical orphanage approach. Aspects of Modern English Linguistics. Chiba, S. (ed.), 232–254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. B.
1975On assertive predicates. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 41. Kimball, J. P. (ed.), 91–124. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press: New York. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R.
1994The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge MIT: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, E.
2003Epistemic Stance in English Conversation. A Description of its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on “I think”. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Peterson, P.
1999On the boundaries of syntax: non-syntagmatic relations. The clause in English, Collins, P. & D. Lee (eds.), 229–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman: London.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. R.
2007Grammar without Grammaticality. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 3(1): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. & Mulac, A.
1991Thompson and Mulac 1991 A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. Approaches to grammaticalization. Vol II. Typological Studies in Language. 191, Traugott, E. C. & Heine, B. (eds.), 313–239. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar