Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 34:3 (2010) ► pp.680688
References (23)
References
Blake, B. J. 2001. Case, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. 1998. Irrealis as a grammatical category. Anthropological Linguistics 401: 257–71.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1986. Markedness, grammar, people and the world. Markedness, E. A. M. Fred, R. Eckman & J. R. Wirth (eds.), 85–196. New York: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, S. 2003. Subordination. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, P. W. & R. Jackendoff. 1997. Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination. Linguistic Inquiry 281: 195–217.Google Scholar
Dench, A. & N. Evans. 1988. Multiple case-marking in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 81: 1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, S. C. 1968. Coordination: its implications for the theory of general linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. R. 2000. Realis and irrealis: Forms and concepts of the grammaticalization of reality. Linguistic Typology 41: 55–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, W. A. & R. D. Van Valin, Jr. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1994. Irrealis and the subjunctive. Studies in Language 181: 265–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. Syntax: An introduction, Vol. II1. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 1985. Natural syntax. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. & S. A. Thompson. 1984. ‘Subordination’ in universal grammar. Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of Berkeley Linguistic Society, 510–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1995. The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In: Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, M. Haspelmath & E. König (eds.), 1–56. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1999. On the cross-linguistic distribution of same-subject and different-subject complement clauses: Economic vs. iconic motivation’. Downloadable at [URL]
Heine, B. 2009. Grammaticalization. The Oxford handbook of case, A. Malchukov & A. Spencer (eds.), 458–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K. 1998. Adverbial clauses in the languages of Europe. Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, J. van der Auwera and D. P. O’Baoill. eds.), pp. 335–419. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & E. C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, Second edition. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C. 1988. Towards a typology of clause linkage. Clause combining in grammar and discourse, J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (eds.), 181–225. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathiessen, C. & S. A. Thompson. 1988. The structure of discourse and subordination. Clause combining in grammar and discourse, J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (eds.), 275–327. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, M. 2007. Complementation. Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd edition, Volume 21: Complex constructions. T. Shopen (ed.), 52–150. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. R. 1985. Complex phrases and complex sentences. Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd edition, Volume 21: Complex constructions. T. Shopen (ed.), 3–41. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Jr., R. D. & R. J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar