Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 34:4 (2010) ► pp.934942
References
Coseriu, Eugenio
1981Lecciones de lingüistica general. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C.
1997The theory of Functional Grammar. 21 volumes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
2005A semantic approach to English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2006Dyadic constructions. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, second edition. Volume 41: Du-Gen, 24–28. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka
(eds.) 2002Meaning and universal grammar: Theory and empirical findings. 21 volumes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees, and J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2008Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor
1989Semantic primitives from the viewpoint of the Meaning-Text Linguistic Theory. Quaderni di Semantica 101, 65–102.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2007Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1991The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics 171, 409–441.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1991Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Sutton, Johnson and Shields (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–519. Berkeley: BLS.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., and Randy J. LaPolla
1997Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar