Possessive classification, the semantics of inherency and grammaticalization
Anvita Abbi | Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology & Jawaharlal Nehru University
Great Andamanese has a dual semantic system for body part categorization: one that is expressed in various terms for concrete body parts and another more abstract one that is expressed in grammaticalized morphemes represented in seven body division possessive classes that classify body part terms based on the area of the body they occupy. These classes also classify other inalienables, with some semantic connection to the body part system. Further, body part semantics pervade the lexical and grammatical system of the language as this dual system is extended to other form classes, viz. verbs, adjectives and adverbs. The body division class markers occur as proclitics attached to all content word classes. Thus, all content words in Great Andamanese can easily be divided into bound and free, the former necessarily imbued with the semantics of “inherency” and “dependency”. I conclude by proposing that the Great Andamanese conceptualize their world through these interdependencies and hence the grammar of the language encodes this important phenomenon in every part of speech expressing referential, attributive and predicative meaning.
2023. Great Andamanese the Sixth Language Family of India: An Inquiry into the Possible Human Language. In Language Studies in India, ► pp. 107 ff.
Franco, Ludovico
2017. L-syntax and phono-symbolism: on the status of ideophones in complexpredicates. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 62:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
Passer, Matthias Benjamin
2016. (What) Do verb classifiers classify?. Lingua 174 ► pp. 16 ff.
Kemmerer, David
2014. Body ownership and beyond: Connections between cognitive neuroscience and linguistic typology. Consciousness and Cognition 26 ► pp. 189 ff.
Kemmerer, David
2014. Word classes in the brain: Implications of linguistic typology for cognitive neuroscience. Cortex 58 ► pp. 27 ff.
Kemmerer, David
2017. Some issues involving the relevance of nominal classification systems to cognitive neuroscience: response to commentators. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 32:4 ► pp. 447 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.