Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 36:1 (2012) ► pp.183192
References (36)
References
Ahland, M. in prep. A grammar of Northern Mao. PhD. thesis, University of Oregon.
Alvre, P. 1976. Vana kirjakeele küsisõnu. Keel ja Kirjandus 191:343–50.Google Scholar
Andersen, H. 2006. Grammation, regrammation and degrammation: Tense loss in Russian. Diachronica 23 (2): 231–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariste, P. 1973. Eesti rõhumäärsõna ep . Journal de la Société Finno-ougrienne 721: 33–7.Google Scholar
Askedal, J. O. 2008. ‘Degrammaticalization’ versus typology: Reflections on a strained relationship. In Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal papers, ed. Thórhallur Eythórsson. 45–77. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blake, B. J. 2001. Case (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., R. Perkins, and W. Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burridge, K. 1995. On the trail of the Conestoga Modal: Recent movements of modal auxiliaries in Pennsylvania German. La Trobe Working Papers in Lingusitics 81. [URL]
1998. From modal auxiliary to lexical verb: The curious case of Pennsylvania German wotte . In Historical Linguistics 1995, Vol. II: Germanic Linguistics, eds. Richard M. Hogg and Linda van Bergen. 19–33. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L. 1991. Some grammaticalization changes in Estonian and their implications. In Approaches to grammaticalization I1, eds. Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Bernd Heine. 285–99. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doyle, A. 2002. Yesterday’s affixes as today’s clitics: A case-study in degrammaticalization. In New reflections on grammaticalization, eds. Ilse Wischer, and Gabriela Diewald. 103–20. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epps, P. 2008. A grammar of Hup. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Idiatov, D. 2008. Antigrammaticalization, antimorphologization and the case of Tura. In Theoretical and empirical issues in grammaticalization, eds. Elena Seoane, María José López-Couso. in collaboration with Teresa Fanego. 151–69. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuryłowicz, J. 1975 [1965]. The evolution of grammatical categories. Esquisses linguistiques II, J. Kuryłowicz. 38–54. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Kuteva, T. 2001. Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuzmack, Stefanie. in prep. Ish: A new case of antigrammaticalization. Ms., University of Chicago.
Harvey, M. 2003. Reconstruction of pronominals among the non-Pama-Nyungan languages. In The non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern Australia; comparative studies of the continent’s most linguistically complex region, ed. Nicholas Evans. 475–513. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 2004. On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization, eds. Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, and Harry Perridon. 17–44. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. U. Claudi, and F. Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B., and T. Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P., and E. C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, B. D. 2004. Rescuing traditional (historical) linguistics from grammaticalization theory. In Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization, eds. Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde and Harry Perridon. 45–71. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C. 1995 [1982]. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich/Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. 1988. From bound to grammatical markers to free discourse markers: History of some Japanese connectives. Proceedings of the fourteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 340–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, A. 1926 [1912]. L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, I1: 130–48. Paris: Edouard Champion.Google Scholar
Mushin, I., and J. Simpson. 2008. Free to bound to free? Interactions between pragmatics and syntax in the development of the Australian pronominal systems. Language 841:566–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevis, J. 1986a. Decliticization and deaffixation in Saame: Abessive taga. In Studies in Language Change (Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 341), ed. Brian Joseph. 1–9.Google Scholar
1986b. Decliticization in Old Estonian. In Studies in Language Change (Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 341), ed. Brian Joseph. 10–27.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. 1926. Lærebok i Lappisk, I: Grammatik. Oslo: A.W. Brøggers Boktrykkeris Forlag.Google Scholar
Norde, M. 2001. Deflexion as a counterdirectional factor in grammatical change. Language Sciences 23(2–3): 231–64.Google Scholar
Rosenkvist. 2008. A case of degrammaticalization in Northern Swedish. Paper presented at the Continuity and Change in Grammar workshop, University of Cambridge, March 2008.
Voort, H. van der. 2002. The quotative construction in Kwaza and its (de-) grammaticalisation. In Selected papers from the 50th international congress of Americanists in Warsaw and the Spinoza Workshop on Amerindian Languages in Leiden, eds. Mily Crevels, Simon van de Kerke, Sérgio Meira, and Hein van der Voort. 307–28. Leiden Research School of Asian, African and Amerindian studies (CNWS).Google Scholar
Willis, D. 2007. Syntactic lexicalization as a new type of degrammaticalization. Linguistics 45 (2): 271–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegeler, D. 2004. Redefining unidirectionality: Is there life after modality? In Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization, eds. Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, and Harry Perridon. 115–35. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, A. M., and G. K. Pullum. 1983. Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t . Language 59 (3):502–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar