Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 38:2 (2014) ► pp.237–274

Structural change in Catalan discourse

| University of Barcelona
For the function of theme-rheme mapping onto sentence structure, Catalan right-dislocation, a syntactically-based operation, is being replaced by in situ accent-shift, a prosodic strategy. This structural innovation found in the data analysed is probably triggered by a calque from English and Spanish, which uses a prosodic variant. The occurrences found in the corpus (oral television production from non-spontaneous, supervised genres) indicate that the phenomenon is occurring unnoticed by language advisors. By showing that a non-standard prosodic strategy alien to the Catalan inventory has increased over the two periods studied, it is proved that the (structural) calque is making progress. The frequency of the occurrence of this calque may pave the way for its acceptance as a valid Catalan resource among Catalan speakers, as the intimate link between prosody and syntax in Catalan is blurred.
Keywords: theme-rheme, right-dislocation, language change, calque, in situ accent-shift, media, language advisors, language contact, information packaging
Published online: 8 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.38.2.01for
References (100)
Ashby, William J. 1988. The syntax, pragmatics, and socio-linguistics of left- and right-dislocations in French. Lingua 751. 203–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Ruthanna et al. 2000. The LIDES coding manual: A document for preparing and analysing language interaction data. The International Journal of Bilingualism 4 (2). Special issue. Kingston Press, London. DOI logo
Bassols, Margarida, Albert Rico & Anna M. Torrent (eds.). 1997. La llengua de TV3. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Bastardas, Albert. 2005. Cap a una sostenibilitat lingüística. Barcelona: CETC and Angle Editorial.Google Scholar
Bladas, Òscar. 2009. La llengua oral col·loquial. In M. Bassols & M. Segarra (eds.), El col ·loquial dels mitjans de comunicació, 23–39. Vic: Eumo editorial.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1985. Two views of accent. Journal of Linguistics 211. 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Intonation and its Uses. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1993. On proposed universals of grammatical borrowing. In H. Aertsen & R. Jeffers(eds.), Historial Linguistics, 91–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Camps, Oriol. 2003. La correcció d’informatius i programes a la ràdio. In J. Martí et al. (eds.), II Seminari de Correcció de Textos: la qualitat de la llengua oral en els mitjans de comunicació, 19–40. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
Casals, Daniel. 2001. Les polèmiques entre lights i heavies i les seves repercusions en l’elaboració dels models lingüístics per als mitjans de comunicació de massa. In Miquel A. Pradilla (ed.), Societat, llengua i norma: A l’entorn de la normativització de la llengua catalana, 129–162. Benicarló: Edicions Alambor.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In C.N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 25–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Gliugelmo. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 241. 239–298.Google Scholar
Contreras, Heles. 1976. A Theory of Word Order with Special Reference to Spanish. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Cowper, E.A. 1979. Right-dislocation in Franco-Canadian. Papers from the Fifteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society 151. 70–78.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1981. Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela & Philip Locke. 2002. English grammar: A University Course. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Drubig, Hans Bernhard. 2003. Towards a typology of focus and focus constructions. Linguistics 411. 1–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1998. The syntax-focus structure interface. In Culicover, P. & L. McNally (eds.), The Limits of Syntax, 211–240. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Information Structure. The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford Surveys in Syntax and Morphology. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Estebas, Eva. 2009. The use and realisation of accentual focus in central Catalan with a comparison to English. Lincom Studies in Phonetics 31.
Fasold, Ralph W. & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.). 1989. Language Change and Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faura, Neus. 2000. Llengua oral i llengua escrita en els espots televisius. In A. Cros et al. (eds.), Llengua oral i llengua escrita a la televisió, 175–191. Barcelona: Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.Google Scholar
Faura, Neus, David Paloma & Anna M. Torrent (eds.). 1998. La llengua de Televisió de Catalunya: Materials per a l’anàlisi. Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Feldhausen, Ingo. 2010. Sentential Form and Prosodic Structure of Catalan. Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Soriano, Olga. 1989. Tematización, dislocación y focalización en castellano. In C. Martín-Vide, (ed.), Lenguajes formales y lenguajes naturales IV, Volume 21. Barcelona: PPU.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1974. Some aspects of the Czechoslovak approach to the problems of functional sentence perspective. In F. Daneš (ed.), Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, 11–37. Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
Forcadell, Montserrat. 2007. Information Packaging, Language Contact and Linguistic Change: Structural Calque in Catalan. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra Dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2015 (in press). Seqüències no desaccentuables en català: prosòdia aliena en el català de TV3. Estudis Romànics, Vol. XXXVII1.
Forcadell, Montserrat & Enric Vallduví. 2000. Duplicación clítica: el caso catalán. In F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza et al. (eds.), Actas del XVI Congreso Nacional de la Asociación Española de Lingüística Aplicada (AESLA) 11, 679–689. Logroño: Universidad de La Rioja.Google Scholar
Geluykens, Ronald. 1987. Tails (right-dislocations) as a repair mechanism in English conversation. In J. Nuyts & G. De Schutter (eds.), Getting One’s Word into Line: On Word Order and Functional Grammar, 119–129. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Right dislocation and self-repair. In The pragmatics of discourse anaphora in English: evidence from conversational repair, 89–124. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez-González, M. Ángeles. 2001. The Theme-Topic Interface: Evidence from English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Barbara & Yael Ziv. 1998. Centering, global focus, and right dislocation. In M. Walker, A. Joshi & E. Prince (eds.), Centering in Discourse, 39–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K. 1988. Universals of topic-comment structure. In M. Hammond et al. (eds.), Studies in Syntactic Typology, 209–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K. & Thorstein Fretheim. 2004. Topic and focus. In L. Horn & G. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, 175–196. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1985. Two views of accent: A reply. Journal of Linguistics 211. 125–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hajicová, Eva, Barbara H. Partee & Petr Sgall. 1998. Topic-focus articulation, tripartite structures, and semantic content. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 31. 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinskens, Frans, Roeland Van Hout & W. Leo Wetzels(eds.). 1997.Variation, Change, and Phonological Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1980. The Structure of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1981. Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Chungmin, Matthew Gordon & Daniel Büring (eds.). 2007. Topic and Focus: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 1995. The CHILDES project: computational tools for analysing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mayol, Laia. 2006. The discourse function of right-dislocation in Catalan. In Proceedings of the SPRIK Conference. Explicit and Implicit Information in Text. Information Structure across Languages , 35–40. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
. 2007. Right-dislocation in Catalan: Its discourse function and counterparts in English. Languages in Contrast 71. 203–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mir, Anna. 2003. Correctors, assessors, lingüistes: reflexió sobre el procés de revisió de textos escrits. Llengua i Literatura 141. 211–237.Google Scholar
Mollà, Toni. 1990. La llengua dels mitjans de comunicació. Alzira: Bromera.Google Scholar
Paloma, David & M. Segarra. 2000. Llengua oral i llengua escrita a les sèries de televisió. In A. Cros et al. (eds.), Llengua oral i llengua escrita a la televisió, 49-73. Barcelona: Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Cambridge, Mass: MIT dissertation. Google Scholar
Pradilla, Miquel Àngel. 2001. La norma ortològica de la llengua catalana: Establiment i discussió. In Pradilla, M.A. (ed.), Societat, llengua i norma. A l’entorn de la normativització de la llengua catalana, 83–100. Benicarló: Edicions Alambor.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. In Cole, P. (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, 223-255. New York: Academic Press,Google Scholar
. 1986. On the syntactic marking of presupposed open propositions. Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, Chicago Linguistic Society 221. 208–22.Google Scholar
. 1988. On pragmatic change: The borrowing of discourse functions. Journal of Pragmatics 12(5-6). 505–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. On syntax in discourse, in language contact situations. In C. Kramsch, S. McConnell-Ginet (eds.), Text and Context: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives on Language Study, 98–112. Boston: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
. 1998. The borrowing of meaning as a cause of internal syntactic change. In M.S. Schmid et al. (eds.), Historical Linguistics: Thirteenth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 1997, 339–362. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rivero, M. Luisa. 1980. On left-dislocation and topicalization in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 111. 363–393.Google Scholar
Rochemont, Michael. 1986. Focus in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Phonological focus and structural focus. In P. Culicover & L. McNally (eds.), Syntax and semantics 29: The limits of syntax, 337–364. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rodman, Robert. 1974. On left-dislocation. Papers in Linguistics 71. 437–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 11. 75–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Association with focus or association with presuppositions? In P. Bosch & R. van der Sandt (eds.), Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, 232–244. Cambridge: Cambridge Univerity Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress and phrasing. In J.A. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 550–569. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1993. On the permeability of grammars: Evidence from Spanish and English contact. In W.J. Ashby et al. (eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on the Romance Languages, Twenty-first Linguistic Symposium on Romance (Santa Barbara, 1991), 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 1994. Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1998. On borrowing as a mechanism of syntactic change. In A. Schwegler et al. (eds.), Romance Linguistics: Theoretical Perspectives. Twenty-seventh Linguistic Symposium on Romance Language (Irvine, 1997), 225–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steedman, Mark. 1991. Structure and intonation. Language 67(2). 260–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry 31(4). 649–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Televisió de Catalunya. 1995. El català a TV3. Llibre d’estil. Barcelona: Edicions 62.
. 1997. Criteris lingüístics sobre traducció i doblatge. Barcelona: Edicions 62.
Tenenbaum, Sarah. 1977. Left- and right-dislocation. In E. Byarushengo, A. Duranti, & L. Hyman (eds.), Haya Grammatical Structures(Southern California occasional papers in linguistics (SCOPIL) 6), 161–170. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Terken, Jacques & Julia Hirschberg. 1994. Deaccentuation of words representing ‘given’ information: Effects of persistence of grammatical role and surface position. Language and Speech 371. 125–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrent, Anna M. 2002. La interferència en la llengua de la televisió catalana. In M. Antonia Cano, et al. (eds.), Les claus del canvi lingüístic, 101–134. Alacant: Institut Interuniversitari de Filologia Valenciana.Google Scholar
Tubau, Iván. 1990. El català que ara es parla: llengua i periodisme a la ràdio i la televisió. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Turell, M. Teresa. 1995. La base teòrica i metodològica de la variació lingüística. In M.T. Turell (ed.), La sociolingüística de la Variació, 17–49. Barcelona: PPU.Google Scholar
. 2000. More on the interplay between internal and external factors: Dialect convergence and divergence of Catalan. In K.J. Mattheier (ed.), VarioLingua: Dialect and Migration in a Changing Europe, 43–56. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef. 1966. The Linguistic School of Prague. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Vallduví, Enric. 1992. The Informational Component. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
. 1994. Detachment in Catalan and information packaging. Journal of Pragmatics 221. 573–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Structural properties of information packaging in Catalan. In K.É Kiss (ed.), Discourse Configurational Languages, 122–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. L’oració com a unitat informativa. In J. Solà, M.R. Lloret, J. Mascaró & M. Pérez Saldanya (eds.), Gramàtica del Català Contemporani, Vol. 21, 1221–1279. Empúries: Barcelona.Google Scholar
Vallduví, Enric & Ron Zacharski. 1994. Accenting phenomena, association with focus and the recursiveness of focus-ground. In P. Dekker & M. Stokhof (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Amsterdam Colloquium, 683–702. Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation.Google Scholar
Vallduví, Enric & Elisabet Engdahl. 1996. The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 341. 459–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vallverdú, Francesc. 1985. El model de llengua als mitjans de comunicació. In Actes de les II Jornades d’Estudi de la Llengua Normativa, 88–111. Barcelona: Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.Google Scholar
. 1986. Elocució i ortologia catalanes per a ús de locutors de ràdio i televisió seguit de La normalització lingüística i la televisió. Barcelona: Jonc.Google Scholar
. 1989. La llengua a la televisió i alguns malentesos sobre l’estàndard. In A. Ferrando & A. Haupf (eds.), Miscel·lània Joan Fuster. Estudis de llengua i literatura, Vol. 11, 391–406. Barcelona: Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.Google Scholar
. 2000. El català estàndard i els mitjans audiovisuals. Televisió de Catalunya. Barcelona: Edicions 62.
Villalba, Xavier. 2007. La dislocació en català i castellà, microvariació en la interfície sintaxi/pragmàtica. Caplletra 421: 273–302.Google Scholar
. 2009. The syntax and semantics of Dislocations in Catalan. Köln: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2011. A quantitative comparative study of right-dislocation in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 431. 1946–1961. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Discourse Pragmatics Model of English Accent. University of Minnesota dissertation.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte & Caroline Féry (eds.). 2010. Information structure. Theoretical, typological and experimental perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ziv, Yael. 1994. Left and right dislocations: Discourse functions and anaphora. Journal of Pragmatics 221. 629–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziv, Yael & Barbara Gros. 1994. Right dislocation and attentional state. In R. Buchalla & A. Mittwoch (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Workshop on Discourse, Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics, 184–199. Jerusalem: Akademon Press.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. Luisa. 1998. Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Forcadell, Montserrat
2016. New prosodic patterns in Catalan: Information status and (de)accentability. Journal of Pragmatics 97 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.