Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 38:2 (2014) ► pp. 360392
References
Ariel, Mira
1988Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24(1). 65–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Barlow, Michael
2004 MonoConc Pro.
Beckman, Mary E
1986Stress and non-stress accent (Netherlands Phonetic Archives No. 7). Dordrecht: Foris Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. Kathryn
1986Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 181. 355–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. Kathryn & Zenzi M. Griffin
2000The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129(2). 177–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Frederic J. & D. Weenink
2011Praat: Doing phonetics by computer[Computer Software]. Amsterdam: Department of Language and Literature, University of Amsterdam. Retrieved from http://​www​.praat​.org/.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1961Contrastive accent and contrastive stress. Language 37(1). 83–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum 1(1). 1–14.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2010Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Richard & Nydia Flores-Ferrán
2003Perseveration of subject expression across regional dialects of Spanish. Spanish in Context 1(1). 41–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1976Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1994Discourse, consciousness and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1995Intonation units and grammatical structure. Linguistics 331: 839–882. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse
2004Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole
2009Clausal parentheticals, intonational phrasing, and prosodic theory. Journal of Linguistics 451. 569–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole & Anne Wichmann
2010aThe multifunctionality of epistemic parentheticals in discourse: Prosodic cues to the semantic-pragmatic boundary. Functions of Language 17(1). 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bSentence-initial I think (that) and I believe (that): Prosodic evidence for uses as main clause, comment clause and discourse marker. Studies in Language 34(1). 39–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W
1987The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63(4). 805–855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Wallace L. Chafe, Charles Myer, Sandra A. Thompson, Robert Englebretson & Nii Martey
2000-2005. Santa Barbara corpus of spoken American, Parts 1-4. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming & Danae Paolino
1993Outline of discourse transcription. In Jane Edwards & Martin Lampert (eds), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse, 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fry, Dennis B
1958Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1(2). 126–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T
1979On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1983aTopic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-linguistic study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983bTopic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-linguistic study, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Syntax: An introduction, vol. 11, 21 vols., 21 edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E
2013Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffman & G. Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 15–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
1994An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hirschberg, Julia & Janet Pierrehumbert
1986The intonational structure of discourse, Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Discourse , 136–144. New York, NY.
Horn, Laurence R
1985Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61(1). 121–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise
2007The role of I guess in conversational stancetaking. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 183–220. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krahmer, Emiel & Marc Swerts
2001On the alleged existence of contrastive accents. Speech Communication 341. 391–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1969Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45(4). 715–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors, vol. 11, 31 vols. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
2005Quantitative reasoning in linguistics. In Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Sociolinguistics/Soziolinguistik: An international handbook of the science of language and society, vol. 11, 2nd edn, 6–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
1987Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics 23(2). 379–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayol, Laia
2010Contrastive pronouns in null subject Romance languages. Lingua 1201. 2497–2514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myhill, John & Zhiqun Xing
1996Towards an operational definition of contrast. Studies in Language 20(2). 303–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson
1995What can conversation tell us about syntax? In Philip W. Davis (ed.), Alternative linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical modes, 213–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Paredes Silva, Vera Lucia
1993Subject omission and functional compensation: Evidence from written Brazilian Portuguese. Language Variation and Change 5(1). 35–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E
1997Describing morphosyntax: A guide to field linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Julia Hirschberg
1990The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha E. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in communication, 271–311. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana
1980The notion of the plural in Puerto Rican Spanish: Competing constraints on (s) deletion. In William Labov (ed.), Locating language in time and space, 55–67. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Elisabete Malvar
2007Elucidating the transition period in linguistic change: The expression of the future in Brazilian Portuguese. Probus 191. 121–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Sali Tagliamonte
2001African American English in the diaspora. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F
1981Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–255. New York: Academic press.Google Scholar
Redeker, Gisela
1991Linguistic markers of discourse structure [review of Discourse Markers by Deborah Schiffrin]. Linguistics 291. 1139–1172.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David
1988aSociolinguistics and syntactic variation. In Frederick Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey (Vol. 41, Language: The socio-cultural context), 140–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988bVariable rules. In Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar & Klaus J. Mattheier (eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society, vol. 21, 984–997. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, Sali Tagliamonte & Eric Smith
(2012) Goldvarb LION: A variable rule application for Macintosh. University of Toronto. URL http://​individual​.utoronto​.ca​/tagliamonte​/goldvarb​.htm.Google Scholar
Scheibman, Joanne
2000 I dunno: A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don’t in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 32(1). 105–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scherre, Maria Marta Pereira & Anthony J. Naro
1991Marking in discourse: ‘Birds of a feather’. Language Variation and Change 3(1). 23–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen
2001Sociolingüística y pragmática del español (Georgetown Studies in Spanish Linguistics). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2003Otra mirada a la expresión del sujeto como variable sintáctica. In Francisco Moreno Fernández, Francisco Gimeno Menéndez, José Antonio Samper, María Luz Gutiérrez Araua, María Vaquero & César Hernández (eds.), Lengua, Variación y contexto: Estudios dedicados a Humberto López Morales, vol. 21, 849–860. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Sun, Chao Fen & T. Givón
1985On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language 61(2). 329–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swerts, Marc, Emiel Krahmer & Cinzia Avesani
2002Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian: A comparative analysis. Journal of Phonetics 30(4). 629–654. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Jennifer Smith
2005No momentary fancy! The zero ‘complementizer’ in English dialects. English Language and Linguistics 9(2). 289–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tao, Hongyin
2001Discovering the usual with corpora: The case of remember . In Rita C. Simpson & John M. Swales (eds.), Corpus linguistics in North America, 116–144. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A
1998A discourse explanation for the cross-linguistic differences in the grammar of interrogation and negation. In Anna Siewierska & Jae Jung Song (eds.), Case, typology and grammar: In honor of Barry J. Blake, 309–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 ‘Object Complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26(1). 125–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Anthony Mulac
1991The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 151. 237–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Catherine E. Travis
2011Using structural variability to evaluate convergence via code-switching. International Journal of Bilingualism 15(3). 241–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Prosody, priming and particular constructions: The patterning of English first-person singular subject expression in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 631. 19–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ForthcomingAssessing inter-linguistic (dis)similarity via intra-linguistic variability for subject expression. In Ana M. Carvalho, Rafael Orozco & Naomi Lapidus Shin (eds.). Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & James A. Walker
2009On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: A variationist study of that . Linguistics 47(1). 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel
1991Lexical diffusion in syntactic change: Frequency as a determinant of linguistic conservatism in the development of negation in English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English syntax, 439–467. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1995Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Catherine E
2005Discourse markers in Colombian Spanish: A study in polysemy (Cognitive Linguistics Research). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change 19(2). 101–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Catherine E. & Rena Torres Cacoullos
2012What do subject pronouns do in discourse? Cognitive, mechanical and constructional factors in variation. Cognitive Linguistics 23(4). 711–748. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie
2010A constructional taxonomy of I think and related expressions: Accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics 14(3). 399–437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, E. Judith & William Labov
1983Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19(1). 29–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Steuck, Jonathan
2016.  In Inquiries in Hispanic Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 12],  pp. 73 ff. Crossref logo
Torres Cacoullos, Rena
2020. Code-Switching Strategies: Prosody and Syntax. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo
TORRES CACOULLOS, RENA & CATHERINE E. TRAVIS
2016. Two languages, one effect: Structural priming in spontaneous code-switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19:4  pp. 733 ff. Crossref logo
Travis, Catherine E. & Amy M. Lindstrom
2016. Different registers, different grammars? Subject expression in English conversation and narrative. Language Variation and Change 28:1  pp. 103 ff. Crossref logo
TRAVIS, CATHERINE E., RENA TORRES CACOULLOS & EVAN KIDD
2017. Cross-language priming: A view from bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:2  pp. 283 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.