Article published in:
Advances in research on semantic roles
Edited by Seppo Kittilä and Fernando Zúñiga
[Studies in Language 38:3] 2014
► pp. 605647
References

References

Alekseev, Mikhail
1988Sravnitel’no-istoričeskaja morfologija avaro-andijskix jazykov [Comparative-historical morphology of Avar-Andic languages]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Aquilina, Joseph
1999English-Maltese dictionary, Vol. 1 (A-D). Valletta: Midsea books.Google Scholar
Arkad’ev, Peter, Jurij Lander, Aleksandr Letučij & Nina Sumbatova
2009Vvedenie: Osnovnye svedenija ob adygejskom jazyke [Introduction: Basic information on the Adyghe language]. In Peter Arkad’ev, Aleksandr Letučij, Nina Sumbatova & Jakov Testelec (eds.), Aspekty polisintetizma: očerki po grammatike adygejskogo jazyka [Aspects of polysynthetism: Essays on the grammar of the Adyghe language],17–120.Moscow: Rossijkij gosudarstvennyj gumanitarnyj universitet.Google Scholar
Balogh, Judit
2000A névszóragozás [Noun inflection]. In Borbála Keszler. (ed.), Magyar grammatika [Hungarian grammar], 183–208.Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Bartels, Hauke
2008Sekundäre Predikation im Niedersorbischen. In Christoph Schroeder, Gerd Hentschel & Winfried Boeder (eds.), Secondary predicates in Eastern European languages and beyond (Studia Slavica Oldenburgensia 16), 19–39.Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag.Google Scholar
Boeder, Winfried
2005Depictives in Kartvelian. Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds.), Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives, 201–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2008Predicative argument marking: The case of transformation verbs. Conference: Cognitive and functional perspectives on dynamic tendencies in Languages, Tartu. (Electronic version available at http://​www​.deniscreissels​.fr​/public​/Creissels​-pred​.arg​.pdf)
2014Functive-transformative marking in Akhvakh and other Caucasian languages. In Pamjati Alexandra, Evgen'eviča Kibrika, Vladimir Plungian, Michael Daniel, Elena Ljutikova, Sergej Tatevosov and Olga Fedorocva (eds), Jazyk, Konstanty, Peremennye, 430–449. Saint Petersburg: Aletja.Google Scholar
Daget, J., M. Konipo & M. Sanankoua
1953La langue Bozo. Limoges.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin, Ferenc Kiefer & Péter Siptár
2003Új Magyar Nyelvtan [New Hungarian grammar]. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar
Erelt, Mati & Helle Metslang
2003Case marking of the predicative in Estonian. Linguistica Uralica 39(3). 166–174.Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & François Thomas
1953Syntaxe latine, 2nd edn. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Gimbatov, Magomed
2006Avar-ʕurus slovar [Avar-Russian dictionary]. Makhachkala.Google Scholar
Groot, Casper de
2008Depictive secondary predication in Hungarian. In Christoph Schroeder, Gerd Hentschel & Winfried Boeder (eds.), Secondary predicates in Eastern European languages and beyond (Studia Slavica Oldenburgensia 16), 69–96. Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag.Google Scholar
2010Uralic Essive. Workshop ‘Uralic case’, 14th International Morphology Meeting . Budapest.
Grünthal, Riho
2003Finnic adpositions and cases in change. Helsinki: Société finno-ougrienne.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude
2010Adpositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Oda Buchholz
1998Equative and similative constructions. In Johan van der Auwera (ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 277–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hewson, John & Vit Bubenik
2006From case to adposition: The development of configurational syntax in Indo-European languages. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Eva Schultze-Berndt
2005Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts: An introduction. In Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds.), Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives, 1–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(eds.) 2005Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holton, David, Peter Mackridge & Irene Philippaki-Warburton
1997Greek: A comprehensive grammar of the modern language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio & Jon Ortiz de Urbina
2003A grammar of Basque. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuwae, Kunio
1989Manuel de japonais. Paris: L’asiathèque.Google Scholar
Lafitte, Pierre
1962Grammaire basque (navarro-labourdin littéraire). Bayonne: Editions des “Amis du musée basque” et “Ikas”.Google Scholar
Le Bris, Pierre & André Prost
1981Dictionnaire bobo-français. Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
Lelkes, István
1967Manuel de hongrois. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Lutkat, Florence-Silvia & Cornelius Hasselblatt
1993Estnisch intensiv: das Lehrbuch der estnischen Sprache. Hamburg: Baltica.Google Scholar
Magomedova, Patimat & Rašidat Xalidova
2001Karatinsko-russkij slovar’ [Karata-Russian dictionary]. Maxačkala: Dagestanskij Naučnyj Centr Rossiskoj Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, Line
2011Copular clauses. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, 1805–1829. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Musaev, Magomed-Said
1987Slovoizmenitel’nye kategorii darginskogo jazyka (kategorii grammatičeskix klassov, abstraktnye padeži) [Inflectional categories in Dargwa (grammatical classes, abstract cases)]. Makhachkala.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1978Secondary predicates. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4. 114–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983Predicate instrumentals and agreement in Lithuanian: A contrastive analysis. Papers in Linguistics 16(3/4). 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Onikki-Rantajääskö, Tiina
2006Metonymy in locatives of state. In Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Lyle Campbell (eds.), Grammar from the human perspective: Case, space and person in Finnish, 67–100. Amsterdam: Benjamins CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinkster, Harm
1990Latin Syntax and Semantics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1991Praedicativum. In Christian Touratier (ed.), Compléments prédicatifs et attributs du complément d’objet en Latin, 72–78. Aix-Marseille: Publications de l’Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, Ekaterina & Elena Tribushinina
2011The Russian instrumental-of-comparison: Constructional approach. In Laura Janda & Marcin Grygiel (eds.), Slavic linguistics in a cognitive framework, 145–174. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Riese, Timothy
1992Der Translativ in den uralischen Sprachen 1. Linguistica Uralica 28. 251–261.Google Scholar
1993Der Translativ in den uralischen Sprachen 2. Linguistica Uralica 29. 1–20.Google Scholar
Rose, Françoise
2011Grammaire de l’émérillon teko, une langue tupi-guarani de Guyane française. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Schönig, Claus
2008Notizen zu türksprachigen Gerundialformen (Konverbialformen) als verbale Kerne von Rollenprädikaten. In Christoph Schroeder, Gerd Hentschel & Winfried Boeder (eds.), Secondary predicates in Eastern European languages and beyond (Studia Slavica Oldenburgensia 16), 327–338. Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Christoph
2008Adverbial modification and secondary predicates in Turkish: A typological perspective. In Christoph Schroeder, Gerd Hentschel & Winfried Boeder (eds.), Secondary predicates in Eastern European languages and beyond (Studia Slavica Oldenburgensia 16), 339–358. Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Christoph, Gerd Hentschel & Winfried Boeder
(eds.) 2008Secondary predicates in Eastern European languages and beyond (Studia Slavica Oldenburgensia 16). Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann
2004Depictive secondary predicates. Linguistic Typology 8(1). 59–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seki, Lucy
2000Gramática do Kamaiurá, língua Tupi-Guarani do Alto Xingu. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min
1999The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Šarić, Ljiljana
2008Secondary predicates in Croatian. In Christoph Schroeder, Gerd Hentschel & Winfried Boeder (eds.), Secondary predicates in Eastern European languages and beyond (Studia Slavica Oldenburgensia 16), 295–325. Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag.Google Scholar
Turunen, Rigina
2011Double encoding of nominal and adjectival predicates: A study of the nominative-translative switch in Erzya. SUSA/JSFOu 93. 385–415.Google Scholar
Veksler, Bunim X. & Vladimir A. Jurik
1975Samoučitel’ latyšskogo jazyka. Riga: Zvaigzne.Google Scholar
Vydrin, Arseniy
2008Are there depictives in Adighe? In Christoph Schroeder, Gerd Hentschel & Winfried Boeder (eds.), Secondary predicates in Eastern European languages and beyond (Studia Slavica Oldenburgensia 16), 423–445.Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1980Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 12. 203–238.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 20 other publications

Caron, Bernard
2017.  In Similative and Equative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language, 117],  pp. 167 ff. Crossref logo
Crass, Joachim
2017.  In Similative and Equative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language, 117],  pp. 387 ff. Crossref logo
Daniel, Michael A.
2014.  In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language, 106],  pp. 205 ff. Crossref logo
Darmon, Chloé
2017.  In Similative and Equative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language, 117],  pp. 359 ff. Crossref logo
de Groot, Casper
2017.  In Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State [Typological Studies in Language, 119],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Forker, Diana
2019. The impact of language contact on Hinuq. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 72:2  pp. 221 ff. Crossref logo
Gildea, Spike
2018.  In Nonverbal Predication in Amazonian Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 122],  pp. 365 ff. Crossref logo
Hynönen, Emmi
2017.  In Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State [Typological Studies in Language, 119],  pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2016. Complementation in Japhug Gyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 39:2  pp. 222 ff. Crossref logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2016. Tangut, Gyalrongic, Kiranti and the nature of person indexation in Sino-Tibetan/Trans-Himalayan. Linguistics Vanguard 2:1 Crossref logo
Metslang, Helle & Liina Lindström
2017.  In Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State [Typological Studies in Language, 119],  pp. 57 ff. Crossref logo
Roulon-Doko, Paulette
2017.  In Similative and Equative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language, 117],  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Schultze-Berndt, Eva
2017.  In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Schulze, Wolfgang
2017.  In Similative and Equative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language, 117],  pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Treis, Yvonne
2017.  In Similative and Equative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language, 117],  pp. 91 ff. Crossref logo
Treis, Yvonne & Martine Vanhove
2017.  In Similative and Equative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language, 117],  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Vanhove, Martine
2017.  In Similative and Equative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language, 117],  pp. 189 ff. Crossref logo
Ylikoski, Jussi
2017.  In Similative and Equative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language, 117],  pp. 259 ff. Crossref logo
Ylikoski, Jussi
2017.  In Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State [Typological Studies in Language, 119],  pp. 217 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Niina Ning
2018. Non-canonical objects as event kind-classifying elements. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36:4  pp. 1395 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.