Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 38:4 (2014) ► pp. 690–716

In search of the origin of na in Mavea

| James Cook University
Reflexes of the Proto-Oceanic common noun marker *na are found throughout the Oceanic language family. In Mavea, there is a morpheme na but it no longer partakes in the determiner system and is best analyzed synchronically as a preposition. This paper argues that today’s preposition is a reflex of the Proto-Oceanic common noun marker *na. Locative constructions are shown to provide a critical context conducive to the reanalysis of *na. Reanalysis has long been established as a mechanism of syntactic change, yet the factors motivating it remain a matter for debate. The dominant view is that reanalysis is driven by pragmatic factors. A rarely voiced view is that it is driven by structural requirements. The data adduced in this paper lend support to a model of syntactic change which can be structure-preserving in nature.
Keywords: Mavea, article, reanalysis, repair strategy, Oceanic, semantic roles, locative, structure-preserving syntactic change
Published online: 08 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.38.4.02gue
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2005 Serial verb constructions in typological perspective. In Alexandra Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry
1994 Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope
2006 A sketch of the grammar of space in Tzeltal. In Stephen Levinson & David Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of space, 230–272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
2001 What’s wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences 231. 113–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Ross
2009 *Leo tuai: A comparative lexical study of North and Central Vanuatu languages (Pacific Linguistics 603). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry
1985 Common noun phrase marking in Proto-Oceanic. Oceanic Linguistics 34(1/2). 135–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2011 Grammaticalization and language acquisition. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 130–141. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre
2007 Noun articles in Torres and Banks languages: Conservation and innovation. In Jeff Siegel, John Lynch & Diana Eades (eds.), Language description, history and development: Linguistic indulgence in memory of Terry Crowley, 313–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gensler, Orin
2002 Why should a demonstrative turn into a preposition? The evolution of Welsh predicative yn . Language 78(4). 710–764. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph
1978/1990 How does a language acquire gender markers? In Keith Denning & Susan Kemmer (eds.), On language. Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, 241–270. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Guérin, Valérie
2007 Definiteness and specificity in Mavea. Oceanic Linguistics 46(2). 538–553. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 A grammar of Mavea, an Oceanic language of Vanuatu. Honolulu: Hawai’i University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice & Lyle Campbell
1995 Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1998 Does grammaticalization need reanalysis? Studies in Language 22(2). 315–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1997 Lost wax: Abrupt replacement of key morphemes in Australian agreement complexes. Diachronica 14(2). 197–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 Hermit crabs: Formal renewal of morphology by phonologically mediated affix substitution. Language 74(4). 728–759. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2009 Grammaticalization of case. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case, 458–469. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2011 World lexicon of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyslop, Catriona
2001 The Lolovoli dialect of the North-East Ambae language, Vanuatu (Pacific Linguistics 515). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Jauncey, Dorothy
2002 Tamabo. In John Lynch, Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley (eds.), The Oceanic languages, 608–625. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
2011 A grammar of Tamambo, the language of Western Malo, Vanuatu (Pacific Linguistics 622). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
König, Christa
2011 The grammaticalization of adpositions and case marking. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 511–521. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kurzon, Dennis
2002 ‘Preposition’ as functor: The case of long in Bislama. In Susanne Feigenbaum & Dennis Kurzon (eds.), Prepositions in their syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic context, 231–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1977 Syntactic reanalysis. In Charles Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2004 Theory and method in grammaticalization. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 32(2). 152–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1991 Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization. Language 67(3). 475–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2001 Syncretism and the classification of semantic roles. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54(1). 35–51.Google Scholar
2003 On the meaning of prepositions and cases: The expression of semantic roles in Ancient Greek. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, John, Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley
(eds.) 2002 The Oceanic languages. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Heiko Narrog
2009 Case polysemy. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case, 518–534. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Naito, Maho
2004a Tutuba texts: ‘A bush sprite and a good man’, and ‘Two bush sprites and two little boys’. Dynamis: ことばと文化 81. 127–148.Google Scholar
2004b ツツバ語の名詞句・名詞句表現に関する考察. Dynamis: ことばと文化 81. 195–200.Google Scholar
2006 ツツバ語の指示代名詞. Dynamis: ことばと文化 101. 1–26.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2010 A diachronic dimension in maps of case functions. Linguistic Discovery 8(1). 233–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pederson, Eric
2006 Spatial language in Tamil. In Stephen Levinson & David Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of space, 400–436. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana
2011 Grammaticalization and language variation. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 209–224. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johan
1996 Prepositions and minimalist case-marking. In Höskulður Thráinsson, Samuel D. Epstein & Steve Peter (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, Vol. 21, 226–256. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm
1988 Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of Western Melanesia (Pacific Linguistics C-98). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
2003 Talking about space: Terms of location and direction. In Malcolm Ross, Andrew Pawley & Meredith Osmond (eds.), The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society. The physical environment, Vol. 21, 229–294. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
2004a Demonstratives, local nouns and directionals in Oceanic languages: A diachronic perspective. In Gunter Senft (ed.), Deixis and demonstratives in Oceanic languages, 175–204 (Pacific Linguistics 562). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
2004b The grammaticization of directional verbs in Oceanic languages. In Isabelle Bril & Françoise Ozanne-Rivierre (eds.), Complex predicates in Oceanic languages: Studies in the dynamics of binding and boundness, 297–330. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004c The morphosyntactic typology of Oceanic languages. Language and Linguistics 5(2). 491–541.Google Scholar
2007 Two kinds of locative construction in Oceanic languages: A robust distinction. In Jeff Siegel, John Lynch & Diana Eades (eds.), Language description, history and development: Linguistic indulgence in memory of Terry Crowley, 281–295. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seiter, William
1980 Studies in Niuean syntax. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Senft, Gunter
2006 Prolegomena to a Kilivila grammar of space. In Stephen Levinson & David Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of space, 206–229. Cambridge: Cambridge Press University. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svorou, Soteria
1994 A grammar of space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Timberlake, Alan
1977 Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In Charles Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 141–177. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2011 Grammaticalization and mechanisms of change. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 19–30. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012 The status of onset contexts in analysis of micro-changes. In Merja Kytö (ed.), English Corpus Linguistics: Crossing Paths, 221–255. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
2010 Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tryon, Darrell
1976 New Hebrides languages: An internal classification (Pacific Linguistics C–50). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Wang, William
1969 Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language 45(1). 9–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar