Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 38:4 (2014) ► pp. 752791
Alfonso, Anthony
1966Japanese language patterns. Tokyo: Sophia University L. L. Center of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1993Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1990Possible verbs and the structure of events. In Savas L. Tsohatsidis (ed.), Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization, 48–73. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
2001Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2010Corpus, cognition and causative constructions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Scott
2011Semantics of case. Morphology 21(3-4). 515–544. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 87–119. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Andreea Calude, Michael Spagnol, Heiko Narrog & Elif Bamyaci
2014. Coding causal-noncausal verb alternations: A form-frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics, 50(3), 587–625. Crossref
Higashinaka, Ryuichiro, Marilyn A. Walker & Rashmi Prasad
2007An unsupervised method for learning generation dictionaries from spoken dialogue systems by mining user reviews. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing 4(4). No. 8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, John
1986Situation vs. person focus. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Sandra A. Thompson
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshihiko
1981“Suru” to “naru” no gengogaku [The Linguistics of “Do” and “Become”]. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
1991‘DO-language’ and ‘BECOME-language’: Two contrasting types of linguistic representation. In Yoshihiko Ikegami (ed.), The empire of signs: Semiotic essays on Japanese culture, 285–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, Wesley
1992The transitive structure of events in Japanese. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Noriko
1996Sōtaijidōshi ni yoru kekka/jōtai no hyōgen – nihongo gakushūsha no shūtoku jōkyō [The expression of resultative state with paired intransitive verbs in Japanese]. Bungen Gengo Kenkyū/gengo Hen 291. 41–59.Google Scholar
Kageyama, Taro
1996Dōshi imiron: Gengo to ninchi no setten. [The semantics of verbs: the intersection of language and cognition]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1972Evidence for Subject Raising in Japanese. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 1(1). 24–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2005Case pattern splits, verb types and construction competition. In Mengistu Amberer & Helen de Hoop (eds.), Competition and variation in natural languages: The case for cases, 73–118. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayes, Patricia
2003Language, social structure, and culture: A genre analysis of cooking classes in Japan. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela
1982On the transitivity of ‘say’ verbs. Syntax and Semantics 151. 301–318.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes
2004Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8(2). 149–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pardeshi, Prashant
2008No smoke without fire: Invisible agent constructions in South Asian languages. In Rajendra Singh (ed.), Annual review of South Asian languages and linguistics, 63–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David
1978Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 41. 157–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Yasuhiro, & Yumiko Nishi
2002Lexicalisation of aspectual structures in English and Japanese. In A. Giacalone Ramat (ed.), Typology and second language acquisition, 267–290. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I
1996Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning, 195–220. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1997Mind, code, and text. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón, 437–467. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Relating narratives events in translation. In Dorit D. Ravid & Hava B. Shyldkrot (eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth. A. Berman, 115–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spooren, Wilbert & Liesbeth Degand
2010Coding coherence relations: Reliability and validity. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(2). 241–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Paul Hopper
2001Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. In Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 27–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku
1981Split case-marking patterns in verb-types and tense/aspect/mood. Linguistics 19(5-6). 389–438.Google Scholar
1985Remarks on Transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21(2). 385–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ueno, Mieko & Maria Polinsky
2009Does headedness affect processing? A new look at the VO–OV contrast. Journal of Linguistics 45(3). 675–710. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valin, Robert D. van Jr
1990Semantic Parameters of Split Intransitivity. Language 66(2). 221–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoshimoto, Banana
1988Kitchin [Kitchen]. Tokyo: Fukutake Shoten.Google Scholar
1993Kitchen. Translated by Megan Backus. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar