Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 39:1 (2015) ► pp.245253
References (24)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: a typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allan, Keith. 1977. Classifiers. Language 531. 285–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2003. Referential density in discourse and syntactic typology. Language 791. 708–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera, Lauren A. Schmidt and Webb Phillips. 2003. Sex, syntax and semantics. In Dedre Gentner and Susan Goldin-Meadow. (eds.), Language in mind: advances in the study of language and cognition, 61–80. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Contini-Morava, Ellen and Marcin Kilarski. 2013. Functions of nominal classification. Language Sciences 401. 263–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Gender, grammatical. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Elsevier. 749–756. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Vol. 711. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt and Erin Shay. 2003. Explaining language structure through systems interaction. Vol. 551. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gablentz, Georg von der. 1901 [1891]. Die sprachwissenshaft: ihre aufgaben, methoden und bisherigen ergebnisse. 2nd ed. Leipzig: C.H. Tauchnitz.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jacob. 1890 [1831]. Deutsche Grammatik. Vol. III1. 2nd ed., ed. By Gustav Roethe & Edward Schröder. Gütersloh: C. Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
Hellwig, Birgit. 2007. Postural categories and the classification of nominal concepts: a case study of Goemai. In Andrea C. Schalley and Dietmar Zaefferer (eds.), Ontolinguistics: how ontological status shapes the linguistic coding of concepts, 279–297. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 2000. Systems of nominal classification: a concluding discussion. In Gunter Senft (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 326–342. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 1984. Verbs and objects in semantic agreement: minor differences between English and German that might suggest a major one. Journal of Semantics 31. 303–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seifart, Frank, Roland Meyer, Taras Zakharko, Balthasar Bickel, Swintha Danielsen, Sebastian Nordhoff and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich. 2010. Cross-linguistic variation in the noun-to-verb ratio: Exploring automatic tagging and quantitative corpus analysis. DobeS Workshop Advances in Documentary Linguistics, Nijmegen, 14–15.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank. (unpublished) The relative frequencies of nouns, pronouns, and verbs cross-linguistically. (grant application) [URL]
. 2010. Nominal classification. Language and linguistics compass 41. 719–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seiler, Hansjakob. 1986. Apprehension. Language, object, and order. Part III: The universal dimension of apprehension. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Senft, Gunter. 1996. Classificatory particles in Kilivila. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 1998. Variation in Major constituent order: a global and European perspective. Constituent order in the languages of Europe, 475–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singer, R., Fletcher, J. and D. Loakes. 2014. What does an NP do in a head-marking language? The use of word order and intonation to express focus on Mawng object NPs, Workshop on information structure in head-marking languages Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, 28–29 March 2014.Google Scholar
Stoll, Sabine and Balthasar Bickel. 2008. How deep are differences in referential density? In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura and Seyda Ozcaliskan. (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language, 543–555. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: the social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Valin, Robert D. Van and Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax : structure, meaning, and function. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David P. 2000. Ants, ancestors and medicine: a semantic and pragmatical account of classifier constructions in Arrernte (Central Australia). In Gunter Senft (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 147–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar