Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 4:2 (1980) ► pp.293308
References
Comrie, B.
1976The syntax of causative constructions: cross-language similarities and divergences. In: M. Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and semantics 6: The grammar of causative constructions. 261–312, Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.
1979Ergativity. Language 551:59–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.
1968The case for case. In: E. Bach & R. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. 1–88, Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
1977The case for case reopened. In: P. Cole & J. Sadock (eds.), Syntax and semantics 8: Grammatical relations. 59–81, Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, W. & R. Van Valin
1977On the viability of the notion of ‘subject’ in universal grammar. BLS 31:293–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
(ed.) 1979Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hale, K.
1970Passive and ergative in language change. In: S. Wurm & D. Laycock (eds.), Pacific Linguistics studies in honor of Arthur Capell. 757–783, Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Helbig, G. & W. Schenkel
Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Distribution deutscher Verben. VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie. DOI logo
Lang, R.
1973Grammatical sketch. In: A. Lang, Enga dictionary. Pacific Linguistics series C, no. 20, xviii–lvii.Google Scholar
Li, C. & R. Lang
1978Enga and other Papuan languages: the syntactic irrelevance of morphological ergativity. Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
Nilsen, D.
1972Toward a semantic specification of deep case. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1973The instrumental case in English. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, D. & P. Postal
1977Toward a universal characterization of passivization. BLS 31:394–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schachter, P.
1976The subject in Philippine languages: topic, actor, actortopic, or none of the above?. In: C. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. 491–518, Academic Press.Google Scholar
1977Reference-related and role-related properties of subjects. In: P. Cole & J. Sadock (eds), Syntax and semantics 8: Grammatical relations. 279–306, Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M.
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In: R. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages. 112–171, Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R., P. Schachter & B. Partee
1973The major syntactic structures of English. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Tesnière, L.
1965Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Librarie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R.
1977Ergativity and the universality of subjects. CLS 131: 689–705.Google Scholar
1979On the distribution of passive and antipassive constructions in universal grammar. To appear in Lingua.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. & W. Foley
1979Role and reference grammar. To appear in: E. Moravcsik (ed.), Syntax and semantics 13: Current approaches to syntax. Academic Press, in press.Google Scholar