Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:1 (2016) ► pp.93–136

Partitioning the timeline

A cross-linguistic survey of tense

| Justus Liebig University Giessen
This article presents the findings of a cross-linguistic survey of tense. In an areally and genetically balanced sample, 318 languages were investigated for whether they have tense and, if so, how they partition the timeline with respect to the deictic centre. Three quarters of the languages have tense: the majority partition the timeline into three sections: before, during and after the deictic centre (effectively past, present and future tense). Those languages with only two tenses most commonly have future/nonfuture tense. Interestingly, a group of languages have only one tense, the majority of them the future. This might indicate that there is a stronger motivation for the future tense to grammaticalize than for other tenses, mirroring a real/unreal world divide: real world events are easier to characterize through aspect than events that are yet to happen, which might create a need for a device that locates an event in future time.
Keywords: grammaticalization, nonfuture, nonpast, obligatoriness, absolute tense, cross-linguistic, deictic centre, future, relative tense, tenseless languages, timeline, past, perfect, present, typology
Published online: 29 April 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.1.04vel
References (78)
Abdel-Hafiz, Ahmed. 1988. A reference grammar of Kunuz Nubian. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo dissertation.Google Scholar
Angulo, Jaime de & Lucy S. Freeland. 1930. The Achumawi language. International Journal of American Linguistics 6(2). 77–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Applegate, Richard. 1971. Ineseño Chumash grammar. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Basri, Hasan. 1999. Phonological and syntactic reflections of the morphological structure of Selayarese. Stony Brook: State University of New York at Stony Brook dissertation.Google Scholar
Becker, Richard A. & Allan R. Wilks. 2015. Original S code; R version by Ray Brownrigg. mapdata: Extra Map Databases. R package version 2.2–5. [URL]Google Scholar
. 2016. Original S code; R version by Ray Brownrigg. Enhancements by Thomas P. Minka and Alex Deckmyn. maps: Draw Geographical Maps. R package version 3.0.2. [URL]Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1994. Statives, progressives, and habituals. Analogies and differences. Linguistics 321. 391–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Tenselessness in Southamerican indigenous languages with focus on Ayoreo (Zamuco). LIAMES 141. 149–71.Google Scholar
Bhat, D.N. Shankara. 1999. The prominence of tense, aspect, and mood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols. 2007. Inflectional morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.),. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 2nd edn., 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 169–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. Fusion of selected inflectional formatives. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, chapter 20. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (22 February 2013.)Google Scholar
. 2013b. Sampling case and tense formatives. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, supplement 5. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (22 February 2013.)Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert. 1991. Time and the Verb. A guide to tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1893. Notes on the Chinook language. American Anthropologist 6(1). 55–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boland, Johanna. 2006. Aspect, tense and modality. Theory, typology, acquisition. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Östen Dahl. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language: International Journal Sponsored by the Foundation ‘Foundations of Language’ (SLang) 13(1). 51–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect, and modality in the language of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1981. On Reichenbach’s approach to tense. In Roberts A. Hendrick, Carrie S. Masek & Fary F. Miller (eds.), Papers from the seventeenth regional meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 24–30.Google Scholar
. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2003. Typology and Universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. Verbs. Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowell, Thomas. 1979. A grammar of Bororo. Ithaca: Cornell University dissertation.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Viveka Velupillai. 2013a. Perfective/imperfective aspect. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, chapter 65. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (14 June 2012.)Google Scholar
. 2013b. Tense and aspect. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, supplement 7. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (14 June 2012.)Google Scholar
. 2013c. The future tense. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, chapter 67. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (25 June 2012.)Google Scholar
. 2013d. The past tense. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, chapter 66. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (11 May 2011.)Google Scholar
. 2013e. The perfect. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, chapter 68. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (25 June 2012.)Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen (ed.). 2000. Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dickens, Patrick. n.y. Ju/’hoan grammar . MS.
Dol, Philomena. 1999. A grammar of Maybrat. A language of the Bird’s Head, Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Leiden: University of Leiden dissertation.Google Scholar
Du Feu, Veronica. 1996. Rapanui. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eaton, Helen. 2010. A Sandawe grammar. Dallas: SIL.Google Scholar
Elliott, Jennifer. 2000. Realis and irrealis. Forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality. Linguistic Typology 41. 55–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 1995. A grammar of Kayardild. With historical-comparative notes on Tangkic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology 20051. 621–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Facundes, Sidney da Silva. 2000. The language of the Apurinã people of Brazil (Maipure/Arawak). Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo dissertation.Google Scholar
Fleck, David. 2003. A grammar of Matses. Houston: Rice University dissertation.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael. 1984. West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Frachtenberg, Leo. 1922. Coos. In Franz Boas (ed.), Handbook of American Indian Languages. Volume 21, 297–430. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
Fried, Robert. 2010. A grammar of Bao’an Tu, a Mongolic language of Northwest China. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo dissertation.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax. An Introduction. Volume I1, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González, Hebe. 2005. A grammar of Tapiete (Tupi-Guarani). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh dissertation.Google Scholar
Grondona, Verónica. 1998. A grammar of Mocovi. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh dissertation.Google Scholar
Guirardello, Raquel. 1999. A reference grammar of Trumai. Houston: Rice University dissertation.Google Scholar
Haan, Ferdinand de. 2010. Typology of tense, aspect, and modality systems. In Jae J. Song (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 445–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 2011. The grammaticalization of tense and aspect. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 580–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heuvel, Wilco van den. 2006. Biak. Description of an Austronesian language of Papua. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Hewson, John & Vít Bubeník. 1997. Tense and aspect in Indo-European languages. Theory, typology, diachrony. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, John. 1976. Aspects of Kanuri syntax. Bloomington: Indiana University dissertation.Google Scholar
Israel, Motchakon. 1979. A grammar of the Kuvi Language. Trivandrum: Dravidian Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Janssen, Dirk, Balthasar Bickel & Fernando Zúñiga. 2006. Randomization tests in language typology. Linguistic Typology 101. 419–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 2000. Viewpoint operators in European languages. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 27–187. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kibort, Anna. 2009. Modelling ‘the perfect’, a category between tense and aspect. In Current issues in unity and diversity of languages. Collection of the papers selected from the CIL 18th, held at Korea University in Seoul on July 21-26, 2008, 1390–1404. Seoul: The Linguistic Society of Korea.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laufer, Carl. 1959. P. Futschers Aufzeichnungen über die Butam-Sprache (Neubritannien). Anthropos 541. 183–212.Google Scholar
Leeding, Velma. 1989. Anindilyakwa phonology and morphology. Sydney: University of Sydney dissertation.Google Scholar
Marchese, Lynell. 1986. Tense, aspect and the development of Auxiliaries in Kru languages. Dallas: SIL.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor. 1997. Evenki. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nurse, Derek. 2008. Tense and aspect in Bantu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Routamaa, Judy. 1994. Kamula grammar essentials . MS.Google Scholar
Rude, Noel. 1985. Studies in Nez Perce grammar and discourse (promotion, genitives, antipassive, objects, ergative, Indians, Northwest). Eugene: University of Oregon dissertation.Google Scholar
Shay, Erin. 1999. A grammar of East Dangla. The simple sentence (Chad). Boulder: University of Colorado at Boulder dissertation.Google Scholar
Singler, John. 1990. Pidgin and Creole tense-mood-aspect systems. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sridhar, Shikaripur N. 1990. Kannada. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stirtz, Timothy. 2011. A grammar of Gaahmg. A Nilo-Saharan language of Sudan. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Terrill, Angela. 1999. A grammar of Lavukaleve. A Papuan language of the Solomon Islands. Canberra: Australian National University dissertation.Google Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf & Joachim Ballweg. 1994. Tense systems in European languages. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf. 1995. Tense Systems in European Languages II. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Laurence. 1987. A Vietnamese reference grammar [Rev.]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Paul. 1966. Highland Chontal grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago dissertation.Google Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka & Elke Hentschel. 2009. Tempus. In Elke Hentschel & Petra M. Vogel (eds.), Deutsche Morphologie, 425–40. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka. 2012. An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voorhoeve, Clemens. 1965. The Flamingo Bay dialect of the Asmat language. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Prescod, Paula
2024. Verb marking and classification of adjectival predicates in creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 39:1 ► pp. 250 ff. DOI logo
Cohen, Ariel
2021. Operators vs. quantifiers: the view from linguistics. Inquiry 64:5-6 ► pp. 564 ff. DOI logo
Mollica, Francis, Geoff Bacon, Noga Zaslavsky, Yang Xu, Terry Regier & Charles Kemp
2021. The forms and meanings of grammatical markers support efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118:49 DOI logo
Nose, Masahiko
2020. The Habitual Past in Amele, Papua New Guinea. Journal on Asian Linguistic Anthropology 2:2 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Daleszynska-Slater, Agata, Miriam Meyerhoff & James A. Walker
2019. Order in the creole speech community. Language Ecology 3:1 ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Saipanese English [Varieties of English Around the World, G69], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.