Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:1 (2016) ► pp.93–136

Partitioning the timeline

A cross-linguistic survey of tense

| Justus Liebig University Giessen

This article presents the findings of a cross-linguistic survey of tense. In an areally and genetically balanced sample, 318 languages were investigated for whether they have tense and, if so, how they partition the timeline with respect to the deictic centre. Three quarters of the languages have tense: the majority partition the timeline into three sections: before, during and after the deictic centre (effectively past, present and future tense). Those languages with only two tenses most commonly have future/nonfuture tense. Interestingly, a group of languages have only one tense, the majority of them the future. This might indicate that there is a stronger motivation for the future tense to grammaticalize than for other tenses, mirroring a real/unreal world divide: real world events are easier to characterize through aspect than events that are yet to happen, which might create a need for a device that locates an event in future time.

Keywords: grammaticalization, nonfuture, nonpast, obligatoriness, absolute tense, cross-linguistic, deictic centre, future, relative tense, tenseless languages, timeline, past, perfect, present, typology
Published online: 29 April 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.1.04vel
References
Abdel-Hafiz, Ahmed
1988 A reference grammar of Kunuz Nubian. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo dissertation.Google Scholar
Angulo, Jaime de & Lucy S. Freeland
1930 The Achumawi language. International Journal of American Linguistics 6(2). 77–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Applegate, Richard
1971 Ineseño Chumash grammar. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Basri, Hasan
1999 Phonological and syntactic reflections of the morphological structure of Selayarese. Stony Brook: State University of New York at Stony Brook dissertation.Google Scholar
Becker, Richard A. & Allan R. Wilks
2015 Original S code; R version by Ray Brownrigg. mapdata: Extra Map Databases. R package version 2.2–5. [URL]Google Scholar
2016 Original S code; R version by Ray Brownrigg. Enhancements by Thomas P. Minka and Alex Deckmyn. maps: Draw Geographical Maps. R package version 3.0.2. [URL]Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco
1994 Statives, progressives, and habituals. Analogies and differences. Linguistics 321. 391–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Tenselessness in Southamerican indigenous languages with focus on Ayoreo (Zamuco). LIAMES 141. 149–71.Google Scholar
Bhat, D.N. Shankara
1999 The prominence of tense, aspect, and mood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols
2007 Inflectional morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.),. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 2nd edn., 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 169–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013a Fusion of selected inflectional formatives. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, chapter 20. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (22 February 2013.)Google Scholar
2013b Sampling case and tense formatives. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, supplement 5. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (22 February 2013.)Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert
1991 Time and the Verb. A guide to tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz
1893 Notes on the Chinook language. American Anthropologist 6(1). 55–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boland, Johanna
2006 Aspect, tense and modality. Theory, typology, acquisition. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Östen Dahl
1989 The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language: International Journal Sponsored by the Foundation ‘Foundations of Language’ (SLang) 13(1). 51–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994 The evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect, and modality in the language of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1981 On Reichenbach’s approach to tense. In Roberts A. Hendrick, Carrie S. Masek & Fary F. Miller (eds.), Papers from the seventeenth regional meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 24–30.Google Scholar
1985 Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2003 Typology and Universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012 Verbs. Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowell, Thomas
1979 A grammar of Bororo. Ithaca: Cornell University dissertation.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Viveka Velupillai
2013a Perfective/imperfective aspect. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, chapter 65. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (14 June 2012.)Google Scholar
2013b Tense and aspect. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, supplement 7. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (14 June 2012.)Google Scholar
2013c The future tense. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, chapter 67. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (25 June 2012.)Google Scholar
2013d The past tense. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, chapter 66. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (11 May 2011.)Google Scholar
2013e The perfect. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, chapter 68. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (25 June 2012.)Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
(ed.) 2000 Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985 Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dickens, Patrick
n.y. Ju/’hoan grammar . MS.
Dol, Philomena
1999 A grammar of Maybrat. A language of the Bird’s Head, Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Leiden: University of Leiden dissertation.Google Scholar
Du Feu, Veronica
1996 Rapanui. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eaton, Helen
2010 A Sandawe grammar. Dallas: SIL.Google Scholar
Elliott, Jennifer
2000 Realis and irrealis. Forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality. Linguistic Typology 41. 55–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
1995 A grammar of Kayardild. With historical-comparative notes on Tangkic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel
2005 Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology 20051. 621–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Facundes, Sidney da Silva
2000 The language of the Apurinã people of Brazil (Maipure/Arawak). Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo dissertation.Google Scholar
Fleck, David
2003 A grammar of Matses. Houston: Rice University dissertation.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael
1984 West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Frachtenberg, Leo
1922 Coos. In Franz Boas (ed.), Handbook of American Indian Languages. Volume 21, 297–430. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
Fried, Robert
2010 A grammar of Bao’an Tu, a Mongolic language of Northwest China. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo dissertation.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2001 Syntax. An Introduction. Volume I1, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González, Hebe
2005 A grammar of Tapiete (Tupi-Guarani). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh dissertation.Google Scholar
Grondona, Verónica
1998 A grammar of Mocovi. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh dissertation.Google Scholar
Guirardello, Raquel
1999 A reference grammar of Trumai. Houston: Rice University dissertation.Google Scholar
Haan, Ferdinand de
2010 Typology of tense, aspect, and modality systems. In Jae J. Song (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 445–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2010 Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002 World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
2011 The grammaticalization of tense and aspect. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 580–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heuvel, Wilco van den
2006 Biak. Description of an Austronesian language of Papua. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Hewson, John & Vít Bubeník
1997 Tense and aspect in Indo-European languages. Theory, typology, diachrony. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, John
1976 Aspects of Kanuri syntax. Bloomington: Indiana University dissertation.Google Scholar
Israel, Motchakon
1979 A grammar of the Kuvi Language. Trivandrum: Dravidian Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Janssen, Dirk, Balthasar Bickel & Fernando Zúñiga
2006 Randomization tests in language typology. Linguistic Typology 101. 419–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars
2000 Viewpoint operators in European languages. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 27–187. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kibort, Anna
2009 Modelling ‘the perfect’, a category between tense and aspect. In Current issues in unity and diversity of languages. Collection of the papers selected from the CIL 18th, held at Korea University in Seoul on July 21-26, 2008, 1390–1404. Seoul: The Linguistic Society of Korea.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1994 Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laufer, Carl
1959 P. Futschers Aufzeichnungen über die Butam-Sprache (Neubritannien). Anthropos 541. 183–212.Google Scholar
Leeding, Velma
1989 Anindilyakwa phonology and morphology. Sydney: University of Sydney dissertation.Google Scholar
Marchese, Lynell
1986 Tense, aspect and the development of Auxiliaries in Kru languages. Dallas: SIL.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor
1997 Evenki. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nurse, Derek
2008 Tense and aspect in Bantu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans
1947 Elements of symbolic logic. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Routamaa, Judy
1994  Kamula grammar essentials . MS.Google Scholar
Rude, Noel
1985 Studies in Nez Perce grammar and discourse (promotion, genitives, antipassive, objects, ergative, Indians, Northwest). Eugene: University of Oregon dissertation.Google Scholar
Shay, Erin
1999 A grammar of East Dangla. The simple sentence (Chad). Boulder: University of Colorado at Boulder dissertation.Google Scholar
Singler, John
1990 Pidgin and Creole tense-mood-aspect systems. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sridhar, Shikaripur N
1990 Kannada. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stirtz, Timothy
2011 A grammar of Gaahmg. A Nilo-Saharan language of Sudan. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Terrill, Angela
1999 A grammar of Lavukaleve. A Papuan language of the Solomon Islands. Canberra: Australian National University dissertation.Google Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf & Joachim Ballweg
1994 Tense systems in European languages. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf
1995 Tense Systems in European Languages II. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Laurence
1987 A Vietnamese reference grammar [Rev.]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Paul
1966 Highland Chontal grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago dissertation.Google Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka & Elke Hentschel
2009 Tempus. In Elke Hentschel & Petra M. Vogel (eds.), Deutsche Morphologie, 425–40. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka
2012 An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voorhoeve, Clemens
1965 The Flamingo Bay dialect of the Asmat language. The Hague: M. Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Cohen, Ariel
2021. Operators vs. quantifiers: the view from linguistics. Inquiry 64:5-6 ► pp. 564 ff. DOI logo
Daleszynska-Slater, Agata, Miriam Meyerhoff & James A. Walker
2019. Order in the creole speech community. Language Ecology 3:1 ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
Mollica, Francis, Geoff Bacon, Noga Zaslavsky, Yang Xu, Terry Regier & Charles Kemp
2021. The forms and meanings of grammatical markers support efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118:49 DOI logo
Nose, Masahiko
2020. The Habitual Past in Amele, Papua New Guinea. Journal on Asian Linguistic Anthropology 2:2 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Prescod, Paula
2024. Verb marking and classification of adjectival predicates in creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Saipanese English [Varieties of English Around the World, G69], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.