Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:1 (2016) ► pp.176–203

The role of verbal prefixes and particles in aspectual composition

In this paper we provide an analysis of the function of Polish verbal prefixes and German verbal particles in aspectual composition of incremental theme predicates (ITP) such as eat and drink. Incremental theme verbs (e.g. eat, drink) are well known for the fact that the referential properties of the incremental theme arguments (ITA) affect the telicity of the whole predication. In the Slavic languages, only prefixed incremental theme verbs result in a telic predication. Since in many cases prefixed verbs are perfective, it is often assumed that telicity results from perfectivity. We argue that grammatical aspect is not necessary for achieving a telic ITP, since there are perfective ITPs that do not result in a telic predication. Rather (a)telicity is dependent on the semantic content of the verbal prefix.
Keywords: Aspectual composition, Aspect, Telicity, Polish
Published online: 29 April 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.1.06hel
References (47)
Abraham, Werner. 1997. The interdependence of case, aspect and referentiality in the history of German: the case of the verbal genitive. In Ans van Kemenade, & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 29–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Agrell, S. 1908. Aspektänderung und Aktionsartbildung beim polnischen Zeitworte: Ein Beitrag zum Studium der indogermanischen Präverbia und ihrer Bedeutungsfunktionen. Lunds Universitets Arsskrift.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon. 1986. The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 91. 5–16.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. & B. Partee. 1972. Towards the logic of tense and aspect in English. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Birkenmaier, Willy. 1979. Artikelfunktionen in einer artikellosen Sprache. Studien zur nominalen Determination im Russischen. München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1985. Verb particles in English: Aspect or aktionsart?. Studia Linguistica 39 (2). 157–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Czardybon, Adrian. 2015. Definiteness in a language without articles - A study on Polish. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine Universität Dissertation.Google Scholar
Czardybon, Adrian & Jens Fleischhauer. 2014. Definiteness & perfectivity in telic incremental theme predications. In Doris Gerland, Christian Horn, Anja Latrouite, & Albert Ortmann (eds.), Meaning and grammar of nouns and verbs, 373–400. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 1996. The spatial structuring of events: A study of Polish perfectivizing prefixes. In René Martin Pütz (ed.), The construal of space in language and thought, 467–490. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubisz, S. & E. Sobol. 2006. Uniwersalny Słownik Języka Polskiego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen. 2000. Progressive markers in Germanic languages . In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 605–653. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Filip, Hana. 1993/1999. Aspect, eventuality types and noun phrase semantics. New York/London: Garland.Google Scholar
. 2000. The quantization puzzle . In Carol Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds.), Events as grammatical objects, 39–96. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
. 2001. Nominal and verbal semantic structure – analogies and interactions. Language Sciences 231. 453–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11(1). 55–101.Google Scholar
. 2004. The telicity parameter revisited. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XIV, 92–109. Ithaca: CLC Publications, Department of Linguistics, Cornell University.Google Scholar
. 2005. On accumulating and having it all . In Henk Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds.), Perspectives on aspect, 125–148. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Events and maximalization: The case of telicity and perfectivity . In S. Rothstein (ed.), Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect, 217–256. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filip, Hana & Gregory Carlson. 1997. Sui generis genericity. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 41. 91–110.Google Scholar
Fleischhauer, Jens. 2013. Interaction of telicity and degree gradation in change of state verbs . In Boban Arsenijević, Berit Gehrke & Rafael Marín (eds.), Studies in composition and decomposition of event predicates, 125–152. Springer: Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Degree gradation of verbs. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine Universität Dissertation.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Christopher Kennedy & Beth Levin. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in ‘degree achievements.’ In T. Mathews & D. Strolovitch (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 91: 199–223. Ithaca/NY: Cornell Linguistics Circle Publications.Google Scholar
Isačenko, A.V. 1962. Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart. Teil 1: Formenlehre. Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Istratkova, V. 2004. On multiple prefixation in Bulgarian. Nordlyd 32.2. 301–321.Google Scholar
Jóhannsdóttir, Kritín M. 2011. Aspects of the progressive in English and Icelandic. Vancouver: University of British Columbia PhD-Thesis.Google Scholar
Kabakčiev, Krasimir J. 2000. Aspect in English. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Olga. 2013. Semantics of genitive objects in Russian. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred .1986. Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. München: Fink.Google Scholar
. 1990. Four thousand ships passed through the lock – Object-induced measure functions on events. Linguistics and Philosophy 131. 487–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Massennomina. In Dieter Wunderlich & Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Semantik, 399–417. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 1998. The origins of telicity. In Susan Rothstein (ed.). Events and grammar, 197–235. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth. 2000. Artikel und Aspekt. Die grammatischen Muster von Definitheit. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian. 1985. Definites. Journal of Semantics 41. 279–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Concept types and determination. Journal of Semantics 281. 279–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Is the German perfekt a perfect perfect? In Ingrid Kaufmann & Barbara Stiebels (eds.), More than words: A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich, 369–391. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Mendoza, Imke. 2004. Nominaldetermination im Polnischen. Die primären Ausdrucksmittel. München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität habilitation thesis.Google Scholar
Pelletier, Francis Jeffrey. 1975. Non-singular references: Some preliminaries. Philosophia 5 (4). 451–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piernikarski, Cezar. 1975. Czasowniki z prefiksem po- w języku polskim i czeskim: na tle rodzajów akcji w językach słowiańskich. Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar
Piñón, Christopher. 1994. Accumulation and aspectuality in Polish. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 241. 49–506.
. 2001. A problem of aspectual composition in Polish . In Gerhild Zybatow, Uew Junghanns, Grit Mehlhorn & Lukas Szucsich (eds.), Current issues in formal Slavic linguistics, 397–414. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul. 1998. The progressive in modal semantics. Language 74 (4). 760–787. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rozwadowska, Bożena & Ewa Willim. 2004. The role of the accusative/partitive alternation in aspectual composition in Polish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 391. 125–142.Google Scholar
Śmiech, Witold. 1986. Derywacja prefiksalna czasowników polskich. Wrocław: Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf. 2000. On the areal distribution of tense-aspect categories in Europe. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 265–305. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Malicka-Kleparska, Anna
2023. Theoretical implications of the prefixation of Polish change of state verbs. Open Linguistics 9:1 DOI logo
KARDOS, ÉVA & IMOLA-ÁGNES FARKAS
2022. The syntax of inner aspect in Hungarian. Journal of Linguistics 58:4 ► pp. 807 ff. DOI logo
Fleischhauer, Jens
2019. Aspekt und Genitivobjekt. Eine kontrastiv-typologische Untersuchung zweier Phänomene der historischen germanischen Syntax. By Olga Heindl. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, 2017. Pp 266. Paperback. €49,80.. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 31:4 ► pp. 409 ff. DOI logo
Kardos, Éva
2019. Situation aspectual properties of creation/consumption predicates. Acta Linguistica Academica 66:4 ► pp. 491 ff. DOI logo
Kabakčiev, Krasimir
2018. Response. Studies in Language 42:4 ► pp. 967 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.