Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:1 (2016) ► pp.176–203

The role of verbal prefixes and particles in aspectual composition

In this paper we provide an analysis of the function of Polish verbal prefixes and German verbal particles in aspectual composition of incremental theme predicates (ITP) such as eat and drink. Incremental theme verbs (e.g. eat, drink) are well known for the fact that the referential properties of the incremental theme arguments (ITA) affect the telicity of the whole predication. In the Slavic languages, only prefixed incremental theme verbs result in a telic predication. Since in many cases prefixed verbs are perfective, it is often assumed that telicity results from perfectivity. We argue that grammatical aspect is not necessary for achieving a telic ITP, since there are perfective ITPs that do not result in a telic predication. Rather (a)telicity is dependent on the semantic content of the verbal prefix.

Keywords: Aspectual composition, Aspect, Telicity, Polish
Published online: 29 April 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.1.06hel
References
Abraham, Werner
1997 The interdependence of case, aspect and referentiality in the history of German: the case of the verbal genitive. In Ans van Kemenade, & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 29–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Agrell, S
1908 Aspektänderung und Aktionsartbildung beim polnischen Zeitworte: Ein Beitrag zum Studium der indogermanischen Präverbia und ihrer Bedeutungsfunktionen. Lunds Universitets Arsskrift.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon
1986 The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 91. 5–16.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. & B. Partee
1972 Towards the logic of tense and aspect in English. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Birkenmaier, Willy
1979 Artikelfunktionen in einer artikellosen Sprache. Studien zur nominalen Determination im Russischen. München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005 The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J
1985 Verb particles in English: Aspect or aktionsart?. Studia Linguistica 39 (2). 157–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Czardybon, Adrian
2015 Definiteness in a language without articles - A study on Polish. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine Universität Dissertation.Google Scholar
Czardybon, Adrian & Jens Fleischhauer
2014 Definiteness & perfectivity in telic incremental theme predications. In Doris Gerland, Christian Horn, Anja Latrouite, & Albert Ortmann (eds.), Meaning and grammar of nouns and verbs, 373–400. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa
1996 The spatial structuring of events: A study of Polish perfectivizing prefixes. In René Martin Pütz (ed.), The construal of space in language and thought, 467–490. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
1979 Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubisz, S. & E. Sobol
2006 Uniwersalny Słownik Języka Polskiego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen
2000  Progressive markers in Germanic languages . In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 605–653. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Filip, Hana
1993/1999 Aspect, eventuality types and noun phrase semantics. New York/London: Garland.Google Scholar
2000  The quantization puzzle . In Carol Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds.), Events as grammatical objects, 39–96. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2001 Nominal and verbal semantic structure – analogies and interactions. Language Sciences 231. 453–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11(1). 55–101.Google Scholar
2004 The telicity parameter revisited. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XIV, 92–109. Ithaca: CLC Publications, Department of Linguistics, Cornell University.Google Scholar
2005  On accumulating and having it all . In Henk Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds.), Perspectives on aspect, 125–148. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008  Events and maximalization: The case of telicity and perfectivity . In S. Rothstein (ed.), Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect, 217–256. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filip, Hana & Gregory Carlson
1997 Sui generis genericity. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 41. 91–110.Google Scholar
Fleischhauer, Jens
2013  Interaction of telicity and degree gradation in change of state verbs . In Boban Arsenijević, Berit Gehrke & Rafael Marín (eds.), Studies in composition and decomposition of event predicates, 125–152. Springer: Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Degree gradation of verbs. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine Universität Dissertation.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Christopher Kennedy & Beth Levin
1999 Scalar structure underlies telicity in ‘degree achievements.’ In T. Mathews & D. Strolovitch (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 91: 199–223. Ithaca/NY: Cornell Linguistics Circle Publications.Google Scholar
Isačenko, A.V
1962 Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart. Teil 1: Formenlehre. Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Istratkova, V
2004 On multiple prefixation in Bulgarian. Nordlyd 32.2. 301–321.Google Scholar
Jóhannsdóttir, Kritín M
2011 Aspects of the progressive in English and Icelandic. Vancouver: University of British Columbia PhD-Thesis.Google Scholar
Kabakčiev, Krasimir J
2000 Aspect in English. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Olga
2013 Semantics of genitive objects in Russian. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1986 Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. München: Fink.Google Scholar
1990 Four thousand ships passed through the lock – Object-induced measure functions on events. Linguistics and Philosophy 131. 487–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 Massennomina. In Dieter Wunderlich & Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Semantik, 399–417. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1998  The origins of telicity. In Susan Rothstein (ed.). Events and grammar, 197–235. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth
2000 Artikel und Aspekt. Die grammatischen Muster von Definitheit. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian
1985 Definites. Journal of Semantics 41. 279–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Concept types and determination. Journal of Semantics 281. 279–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002  Is the German perfekt a perfect perfect? In Ingrid Kaufmann & Barbara Stiebels (eds.), More than words: A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich, 369–391. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Mendoza, Imke
2004 Nominaldetermination im Polnischen. Die primären Ausdrucksmittel. München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität habilitation thesis.Google Scholar
Pelletier, Francis Jeffrey
1975 Non-singular references: Some preliminaries. Philosophia 5 (4). 451–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piernikarski, Cezar
1975 Czasowniki z prefiksem po- w języku polskim i czeskim: na tle rodzajów akcji w językach słowiańskich. Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar
Piñón, Christopher
1994 Accumulation and aspectuality in Polish. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 241. 49–506.
2001  A problem of aspectual composition in Polish . In Gerhild Zybatow, Uew Junghanns, Grit Mehlhorn & Lukas Szucsich (eds.), Current issues in formal Slavic linguistics, 397–414. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul
1998 The progressive in modal semantics. Language 74 (4). 760–787. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rozwadowska, Bożena & Ewa Willim
2004 The role of the accusative/partitive alternation in aspectual composition in Polish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 391. 125–142.Google Scholar
Śmiech, Witold
1986 Derywacja prefiksalna czasowników polskich. Wrocław: Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf
2000 On the areal distribution of tense-aspect categories in Europe. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 265–305. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Fleischhauer, Jens
2019. Aspekt und Genitivobjekt. Eine kontrastiv-typologische Untersuchung zweier Phänomene der historischen germanischen Syntax. By Olga Heindl. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, 2017. Pp 266. Paperback. €49,80.. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 31:4 ► pp. 409 ff. DOI logo
Kabakčiev, Krasimir
2018. Response. Studies in Language 42:4 ► pp. 967 ff. DOI logo
Kardos, Éva
2019. Situation aspectual properties of creation/consumption predicates. Acta Linguistica Academica 66:4 ► pp. 491 ff. DOI logo
KARDOS, ÉVA & IMOLA-ÁGNES FARKAS
2022. The syntax of inner aspect in Hungarian. Journal of Linguistics 58:4 ► pp. 807 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.