Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:1 (2016) ► pp. 176203
References
Abraham, Werner
1997The interdependence of case, aspect and referentiality in the history of German: the case of the verbal genitive. In Ans van Kemenade, & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 29–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Agrell, S
1908Aspektänderung und Aktionsartbildung beim polnischen Zeitworte: Ein Beitrag zum Studium der indogermanischen Präverbia und ihrer Bedeutungsfunktionen. Lunds Universitets Arsskrift.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon
1986The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 91. 5–16.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. & B. Partee
1972Towards the logic of tense and aspect in English. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Birkenmaier, Willy
1979Artikelfunktionen in einer artikellosen Sprache. Studien zur nominalen Determination im Russischen. München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J
1985Verb particles in English: Aspect or aktionsart?. Studia Linguistica 39 (2). 157–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Czardybon, Adrian
2015Definiteness in a language without articles - A study on Polish. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine Universität Dissertation.Google Scholar
Czardybon, Adrian & Jens Fleischhauer
2014Definiteness & perfectivity in telic incremental theme predications. In Doris Gerland, Christian Horn, Anja Latrouite, & Albert Ortmann (eds.), Meaning and grammar of nouns and verbs, 373–400. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa
1996The spatial structuring of events: A study of Polish perfectivizing prefixes. In René Martin Pütz (ed.), The construal of space in language and thought, 467–490. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
1979Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dubisz, S. & E. Sobol
2006Uniwersalny Słownik Języka Polskiego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen
2000 Progressive markers in Germanic languages . In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 605–653. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Filip, Hana
1993/1999Aspect, eventuality types and noun phrase semantics. New York/London: Garland.Google Scholar
2000 The quantization puzzle . In Carol Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds.), Events as grammatical objects, 39–96. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2001Nominal and verbal semantic structure – analogies and interactions. Language Sciences 231. 453–501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11(1). 55–101.Google Scholar
2004The telicity parameter revisited. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XIV, 92–109. Ithaca: CLC Publications, Department of Linguistics, Cornell University.Google Scholar
2005 On accumulating and having it all . In Henk Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds.), Perspectives on aspect, 125–148. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Events and maximalization: The case of telicity and perfectivity . In S. Rothstein (ed.), Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect, 217–256. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filip, Hana & Gregory Carlson
1997Sui generis genericity. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 41. 91–110.Google Scholar
Fleischhauer, Jens
2013 Interaction of telicity and degree gradation in change of state verbs . In Boban Arsenijević, Berit Gehrke & Rafael Marín (eds.), Studies in composition and decomposition of event predicates, 125–152. Springer: Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Degree gradation of verbs. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine Universität Dissertation.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Christopher Kennedy & Beth Levin
1999Scalar structure underlies telicity in ‘degree achievements.’ In T. Mathews & D. Strolovitch (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 91: 199–223. Ithaca/NY: Cornell Linguistics Circle Publications.Google Scholar
Isačenko, A.V
1962Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart. Teil 1: Formenlehre. Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Istratkova, V
2004On multiple prefixation in Bulgarian. Nordlyd 32.2. 301–321.Google Scholar
Jóhannsdóttir, Kritín M
2011Aspects of the progressive in English and Icelandic. Vancouver: University of British Columbia PhD-Thesis.Google Scholar
Kabakčiev, Krasimir J
2000Aspect in English. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Olga
2013Semantics of genitive objects in Russian. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1986Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. München: Fink.Google Scholar
1990Four thousand ships passed through the lock – Object-induced measure functions on events. Linguistics and Philosophy 131. 487–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Massennomina. In Dieter Wunderlich & Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Semantik, 399–417. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1998 The origins of telicity. In Susan Rothstein (ed.). Events and grammar, 197–235. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth
2000Artikel und Aspekt. Die grammatischen Muster von Definitheit. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian
1985Definites. Journal of Semantics 41. 279–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Concept types and determination. Journal of Semantics 281. 279–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Is the German perfekt a perfect perfect? In Ingrid Kaufmann & Barbara Stiebels (eds.), More than words: A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich, 369–391. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Mendoza, Imke
2004Nominaldetermination im Polnischen. Die primären Ausdrucksmittel. München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität habilitation thesis.Google Scholar
Pelletier, Francis Jeffrey
1975Non-singular references: Some preliminaries. Philosophia 5 (4). 451–465. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piernikarski, Cezar
1975Czasowniki z prefiksem po- w języku polskim i czeskim: na tle rodzajów akcji w językach słowiańskich. Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar
Piñón, Christopher
1994Accumulation and aspectuality in Polish. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 241. 49–506.
2001 A problem of aspectual composition in Polish . In Gerhild Zybatow, Uew Junghanns, Grit Mehlhorn & Lukas Szucsich (eds.), Current issues in formal Slavic linguistics, 397–414. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul
1998The progressive in modal semantics. Language 74 (4). 760–787. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rozwadowska, Bożena & Ewa Willim
2004The role of the accusative/partitive alternation in aspectual composition in Polish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 391. 125–142.Google Scholar
Śmiech, Witold
1986Derywacja prefiksalna czasowników polskich. Wrocław: Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf
2000On the areal distribution of tense-aspect categories in Europe. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 265–305. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Fleischhauer, Jens
2019. Aspekt und Genitivobjekt. Eine kontrastiv-typologische Untersuchung zweier Phänomene der historischen germanischen Syntax. By Olga Heindl. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, 2017. Pp 266. Paperback. €49,80.. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 31:4  pp. 409 ff. Crossref logo
Kabakčiev, Krasimir
2018. Response. Studies in Language 42:4  pp. 967 ff. Crossref logo
Kardos, Éva
2019. Situation aspectual properties of creation/consumption predicates. Acta Linguistica Academica 66:4  pp. 491 ff. Crossref logo
KARDOS, ÉVA & IMOLA-ÁGNES FARKAS
2022. The syntax of inner aspect in Hungarian. Journal of Linguistics  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.