Cover not available
Article published In:
Lexical flexibility in Oceanic languages
Edited by Eva van Lier
[Studies in Language 41:2] 2017
► pp. 408–444

Categorial flexibility as an artefact of the analysis

Pronouns, articles and the DP in Hoava and Standard Fijian

| University of Newcastle (Australia)
Hoava sa and ria have been analysed as pronouns in some contexts, and articles in others, an apparent case of flexibility in functional categories. However, this analysis depends on an assumption that pronouns are NP head. An alternative analysis employing the Determiner Phrase (DP) demonstrates that in all contexts sa/ria occupy the same syntactic position: DP head. They are always pronouns, alternating with articles in D, an analysis supported by evidence that 1st/2nd pronouns behave in an identical way. This unified analysis gives no grounds for positing membership of separate categories. In contrast, in Standard Fijian (SF) articles and pronouns occupy different syntactic positions: SF pronouns are not in D, but in N. The paper concludes that structures such as DP have considerable descriptive power; pronouns behave variably across Oceanic; and Hoava sa/ria are pronouns in all contexts. Their apparent flexibility was an artefact of earlier analyses, not a feature of the grammar.
Keywords: categorial flexibility, Oceanic, article, pronoun, Determiner Phrase, functional categories, Noun Phrase
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Categorial flexibility
    • 1.2Functional categories
    • 1.3Defining the categories
    • 1.4Hoava
    • 1.5Apparent categorial flexibility in Hoava functional categories
  • 2.Articles in Hoava and Standard Fijian
    • 2.1Articles in Standard Fijian
    • 2.2Articles in Hoava
      • 2.2.1The ‘general article’
      • 2.2.2Null article
      • 2.2.3Davis’s “definite articles” sa, ria and eri
      • 2.2.4Personal articles
  • 3.Hoava independent pronouns
    • 3.1Pronouns with numerals
    • 3.2Pronoun NP ‘apposition’
  • 4.Categorial flexibility of eri
    • 4.1 Eri as pronoun or definite article
    • 4.2 Eri as personal article
    • 4.3 Eri conclusion
  • 5.Status of sa and ria
  • 6.Pronouns and the Hoava NP
    • 6.1Pronouns and nouns
    • 6.2Lexical adnominal modifiers
    • 6.3Pronouns and articles
    • 6.4Pronoun conclusions
  • 7.DP analysis
    • 7.1The DP
    • 7.2Fijian pronouns in the DP
    • 7.3Hoava pronouns in the DP
    • 7.4Hoava determiner summary
    • 7.5Pronouns in D and in N
  • 8.Implications of the pronoun in D analysis for categorial flexibility of Hoava pronouns and articles
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.41.2.05pal
References (33)
References
Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Alderete, John. 1998. Canonical types and Noun Phrase configuration in Fijian. In Matthew Pearson (ed.), UCLA occasional papers in linguistics 21. Recent papers in Austronesian linguistics, 19–44. UCLA Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman & Melita Stravrou. 2007. Noun Phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aranovich, Raúl. 2013. Transitivity and polysynthesis in Fijian. Language 89(3). 199–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe. 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3). 315–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowper, Elizabeth & Daniel Currie Hall. 2009. Argumenthood, pronouns, and nominal feature geometry. In Ileana Paul, Jila Ghomeshi & -Martina Wiltschko (eds.), Determiners: Universals and variation, 97–121. London: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Karen (ed.). 1991. Vivinei ruruhu pa Hoava: custom stories from Hoava. Gizo: Western Province Government.Google Scholar
. 2003. A grammar of the Hoava language, western Solomons. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Martina Wiltschko. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33(3). 409–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel. 2003. The structure of the Noun Phrase in Rotuman. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Ford, Angela. 2000. A DP analysis of Iaai noun phrases. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 121. 1–20.Google Scholar
Ghomeshi, Jila & Diane Massam. 2009. The proper D connection. In Ileana Paul, Jila Ghomeshi & -Martina Wiltschko (eds.), Determiners: Universals and variation, 67–96. London: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry. 25(4): 609–665.Google Scholar
. 2001. The structure of DPs: some principles, parameters and problems. In Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 562–603. London: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, John, Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley. 2002. The Oceanic languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meyer, Charles F. 1992. Apposition in contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan & Diane Massam. 2006. Patterns of phrasal movement: The Niuean DP. In Hans-Martin Gaertner, Paul Law & Joachim Sabel (eds.), Clause structure and adjuncts in Austronesian languages, 125–150. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike & Ruth Spriggs. 2000. Gender in Teop. In Barbara Unterbeck (ed.), Gender in grammar and cognition. Part 1, 321–349. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike & Yvonne Thiesen. 2007. The Teop sketch grammar. ms.Google Scholar
Palmer, Bill. 2009. Kokota grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. Internal objects in Hoava: a VAO language that isn’t. Paper presented at 11th Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association conference. Harvard.
. 2012. Nominal number in Meso-Melanesian. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG12 [12th Lexical Functional Grammar] conference, 440–460. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Palmer, Bill & Ellen Smith. 2016. Differential noun class membership in North Bougainville. Paper presented at 8th Conference on Austronesian and Papuan Languages and Linguistics, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
Pearce, Elizabeth. 1997. Genitive case in the Maori DP. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 91. 31–55.Google Scholar
. 1998. The syntax of genitives in the Maori DP. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 43(3–4). 411–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Number within the DP: A view from Oceanic. In Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Monaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds.), Functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 71, 81–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul H. 1966. On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. In Francis P. Dinneen (ed.), Report of the seventeenth annual round table meeting on linguistics and language studies, 177–206. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth. 1995. On the syntactic category of pronouns and agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13(3). 405–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm D. 1988. Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of western Melanesia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Schütz, Albert J. 1985. The Fijian language. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy. 1991. Determiners in NP and DP. In Katherine Leffel & Denis Bouchard (eds.), Views on phrase structure, 37–56. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1989. Noun phrases and clauses: is DP analogous to CP? In John Payne (ed.), The structure of noun phrases, 151–180. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Höhn, Georg F. K.
2020. The third person gap in adnominal pronoun constructions. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.