Describing lexical flexibility in Caac (New Caledonia)
Like other New Caledonian languages (see Ozanne-Rivierre 1998: 33–34 for Nyelâyu; see Bril 2002: 89–95, 2009, this volume for Nêlêmwa; see also Moyse-Faurie 2004: 15–61), Caac displays little categorial flexibility and, based on formal grounds, one can clearly identify two main syntactic categories: nouns and verbs, in addition to other small classes such as adverbs, adjectives or prepositions. Nouns, however, have the ability to be polyfunctional, and can function as the head of referential expressions as well as the head of predicative expressions in equative constructions, and in a certain type of presentative and spatial constructions, without undergoing any morphological change. By contrast, verbs require deverbal derivation in order to function as the head of referential expressions, a process mainly used for word creation purposes. There is in addition a small number of lexical bases which can function as the head of predicative and referential expressions indifferently. An analysis of the syntactic context in which they occur enables us to interpret them in a particular utterance. Similar lexemes in neighbouring languages have been analysed as flexible lexemes (Bril 2009: 2; in press). In this paper, I would like to explore the extent to which those lexemes can be differentiated from nouns (notably indirectly possessed free nouns) and verbs in Caac, depending on whether one puts the emphasis on formal or semantic criteria.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1The Caac language
- 1.2Issue and overview
- 1.3Terminology and speakers’ perception of word classes
- 2.Distinguishing nouns and verbs in Caac
- 3.Functional flexibility in Caac
- 3.1Nominalization of verbs
- 3.2Lack of verbalization of nouns
- 4.Categorial flexibility and heterosymy in Caac
- 4.1
Pela
- 4.2
Formally identical lexemes: huu, ot, kola, pilu and mweju
- 4.3
Huu, ot, kola, pilu and mweju as flexible lexemes
- 4.4
Huu, ot, kola, pilu and mweju as indirectly possessed nouns
- 4.5Concluding remarks
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References
References (27)
Bril, Isabelle
2002 Le nêlêmwa (Nouvelle-Calédonie): analyse syntaxique et sémantique. Paris: Peeters Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bril, Isabelle
2009 Categories and fluid categoriality in Nêlêmwa (Oceanic, New Caledonia). Conference paper for the ALT-8, Workshop on Polycategoriality, 22nd–26th of July 2009. Berkeley: University of California.
Broschart, Jürgen
1997 Why Tongan does it differently: Categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs.
Linguistic Typology 11. 123–165.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cauchard, Aurélie
Accepted.
Spatial expression in Caac: An Oceanic language spoken in the north of New Caledonia (
Pacific Linguistics Series, volume 6501). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Croft, William
2003 Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1988 A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, Nicholas & Toshiki Osada
2005 Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes.
Linguistic Typology 91. 251–390.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foley, William A.
1998 Symmetrical voice systems and precategoriality in Philippine languages (paper presented at the 3rd LFG Conference, Brisbane 30 juin-3 juillet 1998).
François, Alexandre
2003 La sémantique du prédicat en mwotlap (Vanuatu). Leuven-Paris, Peeters, Coll. Linguistique publiée par la Société de Linguistique de Paris, n°84.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gil, David
1994 The structure of Riau Indonesian.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17(2). 179–200.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haudricourt, André-Georges
1971 New Caledonia and the Loyalty Islands.
Current Trends in Linguistics 81. 359–96.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hengeveld, Kees
1992 Non-verbal predication. Theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hengeveld, Kees & Jan Rijkhoff
2005 Mundari as a flexible language.
Linguistic Typology 9(3). 406–431.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollyman, Jim
1962 Première Esquisse Phonologique Du Caaqac.
Te Reo 51. 41–51.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollyman, Jim
1999a Études sur les langues du Nord de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. Paris: Peeters Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollyman, Jim
1999b Dictionnaire Caaàc-Français. Unpublished manuscript. Paris: LaCiTO-CNRS Archives.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de La Fontinelle, Jacqueline
1976 La langue de Houailou (Nouvelle-Calédonie): Description phonologique et description syntaxique. Paris: Peeters Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1983 A grammar of Manam (
Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 18). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Lier, Eva & Jan Rijkhoff
2013 Flexible word classes in linguistic typology and grammatical theory. In
Eva van Lier &
Jan Rijkhoff (eds.),
Flexible word classes: a typological study of underspecified parts-of-speech, 1–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mosel, Ulrike & Even Hovdhaugen
1992 Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2004 Recherches En Linguistique Océanienne. Habilitation à diriger des recherches. Paris: Université Paris-Sorbonne, Paris IV.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2005 Problèmes de catégorisation syntaxique dans les langues polynésiennes. In
Gilbert Lazard &
Claire Moyse-Faurie (eds.),
Linguistique typologique, 161–92. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires Septentrion.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moyse-Faurie, Claire & Françoise Ozanne-Rivierre
1983 Subject case markers and word order in New Caledonia and Loyalty Islands languages. In
Arnran Halim,
Lois Carrington, &
Stephen A. Wurm (eds.),
Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 41: 113–52. Canberra: Australian National University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ozanne-Rivierre, Françoise
1998 Le Nyelâyu de Balade (Nouvelle-Calédonie). Paris: Peeters Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peterson, John
2005 There’s a grain of truth in every ‘myth’, or, why the discussion of lexical classes in Mundari isn’t quite over yet.
Linguistic Typology 9(3). 391–441.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
van Lier, Eva
2016.
Lexical flexibility in Oceanic languages.
Linguistic Typology 20:2
► pp. 197 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.