Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 41:3 (2017) ► pp.660–716

Agreement with the internal possessor in Chimane

A mediated locality approach

| Independent researcher, UK
The paper examines a type of clausal construction in Chimane (or Tsimane’, unclassified, Bolivia) in which possessors which are apparently internal to patient- or recipient-like possessive phrases can control object agreement on the verb. Various aspects of the construction point to an analysis in which the internal possessor is doubled by an external representation or ‘proxy’ in the clause which mediates the agreement relation between the possessor and the verb. The construction bears some resemblance to external possessor constructions, albeit with the added complication that the possessor itself remains internal to the possessive phrase while its argument function is borne by the external proxy. The paper examines features of the construction and contrasts it with similar or related phenomena which have been identified in other languages.
Keywords: Chimane, Tsimane', possession, prominence, agreement, locality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Language background
    • 2.1Language name
    • 2.2Genetic affiliation
    • 2.3Geography and demography
    • 2.4The number of speakers
    • 2.5Sociolinguistic situation
    • 2.6Environment, subsistence and culture
    • 2.7History
    • 2.8Previous studies
  • 3.The data
    • 3.1Elicitation
    • 3.2Picture description tasks
    • 3.3Other stimulus materials
    • 3.4Corpus
    • 3.5Glossing and example naming conventions
  • 4.Grammar background
    • 4.1Possessive noun phrase
    • 4.2Clitic status of bound possessors
    • 4.3Clausal syntax
  • 5.Prominent internal possessor construction
    • 5.1Previous analyses of pipcs in Chimane-Mosetén
    • 5.2NP-internal status of possessors in pipcs
    • 5.3Applicative -bi
  • 6.Potential analyses
    • 6.1Head-dependent reversal
    • 6.2Structurally prominent NP-internal possessor
    • 6.3Incorporation
    • 6.4Mediated locality
  • 7.Proposed analysis
  • 8.Summary and further questions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 25 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.41.3.05rit
References (85)
References
Adelaar, Willem F. H. & Pieter Muysken. 2004. The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter K. & Joan Bresnan. 1996. Non-Configurationality in Australian Aboriginal Languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 141. 215–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bibolotti, Benigno. 1917. Moseteno Vocabulary and Treaties from an Unpublished Manuscript in Possession of Northwestern University Library, with an Introduction by Rudolph Schuller. Evaston and Chicago: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Walter Bisang & Yogendra P. Yadava. 1999. Face vs. Empathy: The Social Foundation of Maithili Verb Agreement. Linguistics 37(3). 481–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Bernard Comrie & Martin Haspelmath. 2004. The Leipzig Glossing Rules. Conventions for Interlinear Morpheme by Morpheme Glosses. Leipzig: Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan D. & Susi Wurmbrand. 2002. Notes on Agreement in Itelmen. Linguistic Discovery 1(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1982. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Sam A. Mchombo. 1987. Topic, Pronoun, and Agreement in Chichewa. Language 63(4). 741–782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1997. American Indian Languages: The Historical Linguistics of Native America. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1980. The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2003. When Agreement Gets Trigger Happy. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2). 313–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crevels, Mily. 2009. Bolivia Amazónica. In Inge Sichra (ed.), Atlas Sociolingüistico de Pueblos Indigenas En América Latina, vol. 11, Quito, Ecuador: FUNPROEIB-Andes/UNICEF.Google Scholar
Daillant, Isabelle. 2003. Sens dessus dessous: Organisation sociale et spatiale des Chimane d’Amazonie bolivienne. Nanterre: Société d’ethnologie.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary & Irina Nikolaeva. 2011. Objects and Information Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, William D. 1984. Inalienable Possession and Choctaw Referential Coding. International Journal of American Linguistics 50(4). 384–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Bolivar, Gregorio. 1906. Relación de La Entrada Del Padre Fray Gregorio de Bolivar En Compañia de Diego Ramirez de Carlos, Á Las Provincias de Indios Chunchos, En 1621. In Victor M. Maurtua (ed.), Juicio de Limites Entre El Perú Y Bolivia, vol. 81, 205–237. Barcelona.Google Scholar
Dhakal, Dubi Nanda. 2015. Darai Verb Agreement. Himalayan Linguistics 14(2). 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2000. Categories of the Noun Phrase in Jarawara. Journal of Linguistics 36(3). 487–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald. 1999. Introduction. In Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian Languages, 1–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1986. Primary Objects, Secondary Objects, and Antidative. Language 62(4). 808–845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenbeiss, Sonja, Bill McGregor & Claudia Maria Schmidt. 1999. Story Book Stimulus for the Elicitation of External Possessor Constructions and Dative Constructions (‘the Circle of Dirt’). In David Wilkins (ed.), Manual for the 1999 Field Season, 140–144. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Filimonova, Elena. 2005. Introduction. In Clusivity: Typology and Case Studies of the Inclusive-Exclusive Distinction, ix–xii. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Norman M., Greville G. Corbett & Scott McGlashan. 1992. Introduction. In Gre-ville G. Corbett, Norman M. Fraser & Scott McGlashan (eds.), Heads in Grammatical Theory, 1–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Wayne. 1987. Me’ ca Ji’caviti Muntyi’ Beniĉan in [What Happened to the People in the Beni]. San Borja, Bolivia: Nueva Vida.Google Scholar
. 1993. Diccionario Tsimane’-castellano Y Castellano-Tsimane’. San Borja, Bolivia: New Tribes Mission.Google Scholar
. 1999a. Chimane-English Dictionary. San Borja, Bolivia: New Tribes Mission.Google Scholar
. 1999b. A Pedagogical Grammar of the Chimane (Tsimané) Language. San Borja, Bolivia: New Tribes Mission.Google Scholar
Golovko, Evgenij. 2009. Aleutskij Jazyk v Rossijskoj Federacii (Struktura, Funkcionirovanie, Kontaktnye Javlenija). [The Aleut Language in the Russian Federation: Structure, Functioning, Contact Phenomena.]. Saint Petersburg: Russian Academy of Sciences Doctoral thesis.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1987. Language in the Americas. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Grinevald, Colette. 1996. Propuesta de Alfabeto de La Lengua Mosetén [Proposal for the Alphabet of the Mosetén Language]. In Taller de Alfabetos de Las Lenguas Del Oriente Boliviano, Tumichukua. [Alphabeticization Workshop for the Languages of Eastern Bolivia, Tumichukua], Bolivia.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine. 2008. A Grammar of Cavineña. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1983. Warlpiri and the Grammar of Non-Configurational Languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11. 5–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Michael D. to appear. Ditransitives and Possessor Raising in Mi’gmaq. In Papers of the Algonquian Conference 461.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 1998. Documentary and Descriptive Linguistics. Linguistics 361. 161–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huanca, Tomás L. 2005. Tsimane’ Oral Tradition, Landscape and Identity in Tropical Rainforest. La Paz: Campo Iris.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. 2001. Bolivia Censo 2001. Tech. Rep.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica. 2012. Bolivia Censo 2012. Tech. Rep.Google Scholar
Jara-Ettinger, Julian, Edward Gibson, Celeste Kidd & Steve Piantadosi. 2015. Native Amazonian Children Forego Egalitarianism in Merit-Based Tasks When They Learn to Count. Developmental Science.Google Scholar
Jara-Ettinger, Julian, Steve Piantadosi, Elizabeth S. Spelke, Roger Levy & Edward Gibson. 2016. Mastery of the logic of natural numbers is not the result of mastery of counting: Evidence from late counters. Developmental Science. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kashyap, Abhishek Kumar. 2012. The Pragmatic Principles of Agreement in Bajjika Verbs. Journal of Pragmatics 441. 1868–1887. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence. 1990. Language History in South America: What We Know and How to Know More. In Doris L. Payne (ed.), Amazonian Linguistics, 13–74. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Kepping, Ksenia B. 1979. Elements of Ergativity and Nominativity in Tangut. In Frans Plank (ed.), Ergativity, 263–277. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Alexsandr E. & A. Seleznev. 1980. Sintaksis I Morfologija Glagol’nogo Soglaso-vanija v Tabasaranskom Jazyke [The Syntax and Morphology of Verbal Agreement in Tabassaran]. In Vladimir Zvegincev (ed.), Tabasaranskie Etjudy. Materialy Dagestanskoj Ekspedicii 1979 G, 17–33. Moscow: MGU.Google Scholar
Kiyosawa, Kaoru. 2004. The Distribution of Possessive Applicatives in Interior Salish Languages. Papers for the 39th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics 141. 241–252.Google Scholar
Le Sourd, Peter. 2014. Raising and Long Distance Agreement in Maliseet-Passamaquoddy: A Unified Analysis. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1986. The Syntax of English Genitive Constructions. Journal of Linguistics 22(1). 123–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa. 2012. A Guide to Stimulus-Based Elicitation for Semantic Categories. In Nicholas Thieberger (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork, 54–71. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, Mercer. 1969. Frog, where Are You? New York: Dial.Google Scholar
McGill, Stuart. 2009. Gender and Person Agreement in Cicipu Discourse: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London Doctoral thesis.Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity & Rachel Nordlinger. 2017. Possessor dissension: Agreement mismatch in Ngumpin-Yapa possessive constructions. Linguistic Typology, 21(1), pp. 143–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor A. 2001. Communicative Organization in Natural Language: The Semantic-Communicative Structure of Sentences. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Métraux, Alfred. 1942. The Native Tribes of Eastern Bolivia and Western Mato Grosso Bulletin 134 of the Smithsonian Institution. Washington: Bureau of American Ethnology.Google Scholar
Neukom, Lucas. 2000. Argument Marking in Santali. Mon-Khmer Studies 301. 95–113.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina. 2001. Secondary Topic as a Relation in Information Structure. Linguistics 39(1). 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Agreement and Situation Construal. In M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest (ed.), The Uralic Languages Today. A Linguistic and Cognitive Approach, 533–546. Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion, Editeur.Google Scholar
. 2014a. A Grammar of Tundra Nenets. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. Internal Prominent Possessors. Paper Presented at the 6th International Conference on the Syntax of the World’s Languages, Pavia, 8–10 September 2014.
Payne, Doris L. & Immanuel Barshi. 1999. External Possession: What, Where, How, and Why. In Doris L. Payne & Immanuel Barshi (eds.), External Possession, 3–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, David A. 2007. Applicative Constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Piantadosi, Steven T., Julian Jara-Ettinger & Edward Gibson. 2014. Children’s Development of Number in an Indigenous Farming-Foraging Group. Developmental Science 17(4). 553–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria. 2003. Non-Canonical Agreement Is Canonical. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2). 279–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria & Eric Potsdam. 2001. Long-Distance Agreement and Topic in Tsez. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 191. 583–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, Sandy. 2015. Internal possessor prominence in Chimane. London: SOAS University of London doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Sakel, Jeanette. 2002. Gender Agreement in Mosetén. In Mily Crevels, Simon van der Kerke, Sérgio Meira & Hein van der Voort (eds.), Current Studies on South American Languages, 287–305. Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar
. 2004. A Grammar of Mosetén. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Development of an Inclusive/Exclusive Distinction: A Possible Loan Scenario in Mosetenan. In Elena Filimonova (ed.), Clusivity, Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The Verbness Markers of Mosetén Complex Predicates. In Bern-hard Wälchli & Matti Miestamo (eds.), New Trends in Typology: Broadening the Horizons and Redefining the Foundations, 315–338. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2009. Mosetén Y Chimane. In Mily Crevels & Pieter Muysken (eds.), Las Lenguas de Bolivia, 333–375. La Paz, Bolivia: Plurales Editores.Google Scholar
. 2011. Mosetén and Chimane Argument Coding: A Layered System. International Journal ofAmerican Linguistics 77(4). 537–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1994. An Integrational Approach to Possessor Raising, Ethical Datives, and Adversative Passives. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol. 201, 461–486. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Kirill. 2012. Tseltal Clause Structure. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Doctoral thesis.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. & Ramawatar Yadav. 1988. Maithili Verb Agreement and the Control Agreement Principle. In Diane Brentari, Gary Larson & Lynn MacLeod (eds.), Papers from the 24th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part Two: Parasession on Agreement in Grammatical Theory, 304–321. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Suárez, Jorge A. 1969. Mosetén and Pano-Tacanan. Anthropological Linguistics 11(9). 255–266.Google Scholar
1973. Macro-Pano-Tacanan. International Journal of American Linguistics 39(3). 137–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1963. Acerca de Languages Aborigines de America Latina [On Aboriginal Languages of Latin America]. Current Anthropology 41. 317–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Gijn, Rik. 2006. A Grammar of Yurakaré. Nijmegen: Radboud University dissertation.Google Scholar
Van Staden, Miriam, Gunter Senft, Jürgen Bohnemeyer & N. J. Enfield. 2001. Staged Events. In Stephen C. Levinson & N. J. Enfield (eds.), Manual for the Field Season 2001, 115–125. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Vázquez Álvarez, Juan Jesús. 2011. A Grammar of Chol, a Mayan Language. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin Doctoral thesis.Google Scholar
Verma, Manindra K. 1991. Exploring the Parameters of Agreement: The Case of Magahi. Language Sciences, 13(2). 125–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilde, Christopher P. 2008. A Sketch of the Phonology and Grammar of Rājbanshi: The University of Helsinki Doctoral thesis.Google Scholar
Willson, Stephen R. 1996. Verb Agreement and Case Marking in Burushaski. Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics 401. 1–71.Google Scholar
Yadav, Ramawatar. 1996. A Reference Grammar of Maithili (Trends in Linguistic Documentation 11). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zavala, Roberto. 1999. External Possessor in Oluta Popoluca (Mixean): Applicatives and Incorporation of Relational Terms. In Doris L. Payne & Immanuel Barshi (eds.), External Possession, 339–372. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. Heads. Journal of Linguistics 211. 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1983. Cliticization vs. Inflection: English n’t. Language 591. 502–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Cristia, Alejandrina, Gianmatteo Farabolini, Camila Scaff, Naomi Havron, Jonathan Stieglitz & Karen E. Mulak
2020. Infant-directed input and literacy effects on phonological processing: Non-word repetition scores among the Tsimane’. PLOS ONE 15:9 ► pp. e0237702 ff. DOI logo
Nikolaeva, Irina
2020. Constructional analogy and reanalysis in possessive applicatives. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.