A Functional Approach to Subject Inversion
It has been argued by Kayne and Pollock (1978a-b) that, in French, full NP subject inversion (henceforth SI) can be reduced to a stylistic rule of the form Move NP, the application of which would be triggered by WH. To be descriptively accurate, a general analysis of SI would have to take into account on the one hand that not all WH-words are compatible with SI (e.g. *pourquoi part Jean?) as noted for instance by Cornulier (1974) and on the other that SI does occur in the absence of WH (e.g. in sentences with list interpretation, live coverage of sports events). These apparent exceptions can all be explained when we take into account a number of pragmatic factors such as focusing and discourse context. Taking these factors into account provides a basis for ex-plaing why some uses of SI are conditioned by style or register while others are not, and why consequently French syntax has to include at least two distinct rules of subject inversion.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Lauwers, Peter & Els Tobback
2020.
Predicational and (Quasi‐)Specificational Constructions with Fronted Adjectival Predicates in French1.
Transactions of the Philological Society 118:3
► pp. 468 ff.
Gournay, Lucie
2014.
Les auxiliaires modaux et l’inversion du sujet nominal en français et en anglais.
Linx :70-71
► pp. 165 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.