Article published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 5:3 (1981) ► pp.361–394
Grammatical Relations in Ergative Languages
Two of the most important issues in the discussion of ergativity concern the pattern of syntactic organization and notion of subject in ergative languages. A number of scholars have claimed that most morphologically ergative languages are in fact syntactically accusative. Data from four ergative languages (Archi, Enga, Jacaltec and Dyirbal) are examined with regard to these two questions. It is found that each of these languages differs from the others both in syntactic organization and notion of subject, and these facts call into question recent claims about the syntax of ergative languages.
Cited by
Cited by 29 other publications
Bańczerowski, Jerzy
1993. Some theoretical aspects of diathesis. In Sprache - Kommunikation - Informatik, ► pp. 17 ff. 
Butler, Christopher S.
2012. Syntactic functions in Functional Discourse Grammar and Role and Reference Grammar: an evaluative comparison. Language Sciences 34:4 ► pp. 480 ff.
Creissels, Denis
2008. Direct and indirect explanations of typopological regularities: The case of alignment variations. Folia Linguistica 42:1-2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Creissels, Denis
2009. Uncommon patterns of core term marking and case terminology. Lingua 119:3 ► pp. 445 ff.
Cumming, Susanna & Fay Wouk
1987. Is there ‘discourse ergativity’ in Austronesian languages?. Lingua 71:1-4 ► pp. 271 ff.
Donohue, Mark
2005. Configurationality in the Languages of New Guinea* * I wish to acknowledge the contributions of many conversations with Bill Foley and Jane Simpson about matters discussed in the following article, made possible by the research environment provided by the University of Sydney. Further, two patient AJL reviewers have improved the clarity of this article immensely, a host of patient grammar-writers have both unknowingly and knowingly supplied data, and several classes of sometimes patient students in several continents who have seen these ideas tried out and refined, and our Lani friends in Australia and Papua, especially Indep Wanimbo deserve thanks for their patience. The usual disclaimers apply.. Australian Journal of Linguistics 25:2 ► pp. 181 ff.
Haig, Geoffrey
1998. On the interaction of morphological and syntactic ergativity: Lessons from Kurdish. Lingua 105:3-4 ► pp. 149 ff.
Jones, Linda K.
1986. The question of Ergativity in Yawa, a Papuan language∗. Australian Journal of Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Larsen, Thomas W.
1987. The syntactic status of ergativity in Quiché. Lingua 71:1-4 ► pp. 33 ff.
Legate, Julie Anne
2008. Morphological and Abstract Case. Linguistic Inquiry 39:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Malchukov, Andrej L.
2018. Chapter 10. Forty years in the search of a/the subject. In Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 200], ► pp. 241 ff.
Morbiato, Anna
2018. How Subjective Is the Subject? A Fresh Look at Grammatical Relations in Mandarin Chinese. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie orientale :1
Pradeep Kumar Das
2016. REVERSED COMPOUND VERBS IN HINDI: AN INQUIRY OF ITS FORM AND FUNCTION. Journal of South Asian Studies 22:1 ► pp. 153 ff.
Rahman, Ghani, Abdul Hamid, Laraib Rahat, Arshad Ali Khan & Abid Karam
2021. VERBAL CLITICS IN ROLE AND REFERENCE GRAMMAR. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 9:2 ► pp. 581 ff.
Roberts, Linda
1995. Pivots, voice and macroroles: From Germanic to universal grammar. Australian Journal of Linguistics 15:2 ► pp. 157 ff.
Seržant, Ilja A., Katarzyna Maria Janic, Darja Dermaku & Oneg Ben Dror
2021. Typology of coding patterns and frequency effects of antipassives. Studies in Language 45:4 ► pp. 968 ff.
Sun, Xiaoxue & Yicheng Wu
2022. (Non-)compositionality and complexity: A crosslinguistic investigation. Lingua 275 ► pp. 103344 ff.
URA, HIROYUKI
2006. A Parametric Syntax of Aspectually Conditioned Split-Ergativity. In ERGATIVITY [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 65], ► pp. 111 ff.
Valin, Jr., Robert D. van
2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface,
Van der Auwera, Johan
1985. Talmy Givón, Syntax. A functional-typological introduction. Volume I. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1984. Pp. xx + 464.. Journal of Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 503 ff.
Van Valin, R.D.
2006. Functional Relations. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 683 ff.
van Valin, Robert D.
1983. Pragmatics, ergativity and grammatical relations. Journal of Pragmatics 7:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Van Valin, Robert D.
1991. Another look at Icelandic case marking and grammatical relations. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9:1 ► pp. 145 ff.
Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
2022. Role and reference grammar. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 1171 ff.
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & Ricardo Mairal Usón
2014. Interfacing the lexicon and an ontology in a linking system. In Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 68], ► pp. 205 ff.
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena
[no author supplied]
2001. Bibliography. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, ► pp. 768 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.