Topicality, Ergativity, and Transitivity in Narrative Discourse: Evidence from Chamorro

Cooreman, Ann

doi:10.1075/sl.6.3.03coo

Article published In:

Studies in Language
Vol. 6:3 (1982) ► pp.343–374

Topicality, Ergativity, and Transitivity in Narrative Discourse

Evidence from Chamorro

Ann Cooreman | University of Oregon

Published online: 1 January 1982

https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.6.3.03coo

Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Order by:

Aldridge, Edith

2008. Generative Approaches to Ergativity. Language and Linguistics Compass 2:5 ► pp. 966 ff.

Aldridge, Edith

2021. Syntactic conditions on accusative to ergative alignment change in Austronesian languages. Journal of Historical Linguistics 11:2 ► pp. 214 ff.

Cumming, Susanna & Fay Wouk

1987. Is there ‘discourse ergativity’ in Austronesian languages?. Lingua 71:1-4 ► pp. 271 ff.

Givón, T.

2017. The Story of Zero,

Imamura, Satoshi

2022. A corpus analysis of two by-passives in Japanese from the viewpoint of information structure. Lingua 272 ► pp. 103285 ff.

McGregor, William B.

2007. Ergative Marking of Intransitive Subjects in Warrwa. Australian Journal of Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 201 ff.

Murphy, Patrick

2005. Topicality, Predicate Prototypes, and Conceptual Space. Journal of Universal Language 6:1 ► pp. 65 ff.

Tsunoda, Tasaku

2023. Grammar (morphosyntax) and discourse. Studies in Language 47:4 ► pp. 830 ff.

[no author supplied]

1987. References. In Transitivity and Discourse Continuity in Chamorro Narratives,

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.