Review published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 9:2 (1985) ► pp. 283291
References
Anttila, Raimo
1974 ‘Formalization as degeneration in historical linguistics’ in John M. Anderson and Charles Jones (eds.), Historical Linguistics Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1977Analogy The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bynon, Theodora
1978The neogrammarians and their successorsTPS 1978, 111–23.Google Scholar
1983Historical linguistics (amended reprint) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Anna Morpurgo
1978 ‘Analogy, segmentation and the early neogrammariansTPS 1978, 36–50Google Scholar
Fisiak, Jacek
(ed.) 1980Historical morphology The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Richard M.
1979 ‘Analogy and phonologyJL 151, 55–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan Bybee
1976An introduction to natural generative phonology New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1979 ‘Child morphology and morphophonemic changeLinguistics 171, 21–50; also in Fisiak (1980) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981 (with Mary Alexandra Brewer) ‘Explanation in morphophonemics: changes in Provençal and Spanish preterite formsLingua 521, 201–42.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1980 ‘Concluding statement’ in Elizabeth Closs Traugott et al. (eds.), Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguistics Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manczak, Witold
1980 ‘Laws of analogy’ in Fisiak (1980), 283–88.Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, Willi
1980 ‘Aspekte der Analogietheorie’ in Helmut Ludtke (ed.), Kommunikationstheoretische Grundlagen des Sprachwandels Berlin: de Gruyter 80–130.Google Scholar
Schindler, Jochen
1974 ‘Fragen zum paradigmatischen AusgleichDie Sprache 201, 1–9.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel
1980 ‘Words versus morphemes in morphological change: the case of Italian -iamo ’ in Fisiak (1980), 383–98.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Cathy J.
1982 ‘Historical evidence on speakers’ morphemic analysis of noun declensionsStudia Linguistica 361, 141–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar