In this article five existing explanations for the loss of case morphology in the Germanic languages are examined. These are (1) phonological erosion, (2) a change from synthetic to analytic language type, (3) a change from free to fixed word order, (4) the development of the definite article, and (5) a change from lexical to structural case. All five explanations are rejected in favor of (6) a usage-based constructional approach where the breakdown of the case system is expected on the basis of the fact that the argument structure constructions are partially synonymous. Hence, it is predicted that the case and argument structure constructions will either merge, with subsequent loss of case distinctions and case morphology, or that high type frequency constructions will attract new verbs and verbs from low type frequency constructions, gradually causing them to fall into disuse. English, Mainland Scandinavian and Dutch have taken the former path, while German, Icelandic and Faroese have developed along the latter.
2023. The semiotics of motion encoding in Early English: a cognitive semiotic analysis of phrasal verbs in Old and Middle English. Semiotica 2023:251 ► pp. 55 ff.
McFadden, Thomas
2020. Case in Germanic. In The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics, ► pp. 282 ff.
2018. Ditransitives in Middle English: on semantic specialisation and the rise of the dative alternation. English Language and Linguistics 22:01 ► pp. 149 ff.
2013. Agent-Based Models of Strategies for the Emergence and Evolution of Grammatical Agreement. PLoS ONE 8:3 ► pp. e58960 ff.
Abraham, Werner & Elisabeth Leiss
2012. The Case Differential: Syntagmatic Versus Paradigmatic Case – Its Status In Synchrony And Diachrony. Transactions of the Philological Society 110:3 ► pp. 316 ff.
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2011. Lexical vs. structural case: a false dichotomy. Morphology 21:3-4 ► pp. 619 ff.
Butt, Miriam & Tafseer Ahmed
2011. The redevelopment of Indo-Aryan case systems from a lexical semantic perspective. Morphology 21:3-4 ► pp. 545 ff.
Enger, Hans-Olav
2011. Gender and contact – a Natural Morphology perspective on Scandinavian examples. In Linguistic Universals and Language Variation, ► pp. 171 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.