This paper is concerned with two kinds of so-called R-impersonals, i.e. impersonals triggered by a reduction in referentiality, namely third-person plural impersonals (3pl-imps) and man-constructions (man-imps). In the languages of Europe, both of these impersonal constructions display a wide range of uses including referential uses and therefore enter into competition with topicality and definiteness based-impersonals. Building on the work of Giacalone Ramat & Sansò (2008), the current paper maps out the distribution of 3pl-imps relative to man-imps and relates these patterns to an important typological factor in the European context, namely the formal realization of pronominal subjects (see e.g. Holmberg 2005; Cabredo Hofherr 2006; Siewierska 2007). This relationship will, however, be argued to be somewhat more nuanced that has been previously assumed.
Keywords: generic; episodic; existential; passive; agentivity; pro-drop; voice
2021. Developing and validating a visual questionnaire for the study of impersonalisation strategies: A design thinking approach. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39:2 ► pp. 152 ff.
Breed, Adri & Daniël Van Olmen
2021. The Passive as an Impersonalisation Strategy in Afrikaans and Dutch: A Corpus Investigation. Dutch Crossing 45:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
Data-Bukowska, Ewa
2019. Coming nearer and nearer: A cognitive grammar account of the third person plural impersonal. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives :19
2021. The Man-impersonal sDm.n-ti/tw(=f) Form in Earlier Egyptian. Lingua Aegyptia - Journal of Egyptian Language Studies :29 ► pp. 37 ff.
Díaz Hernández, Roberto A.
2022. The Man-impersonal Verb Forms of the Suffix Pronoun Conjugation in Earlier Egyptian. Lingua Aegyptia - Journal of Egyptian Language Studies :30 ► pp. 25 ff.
Fenger, Paula
2018. How impersonal does one get?. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 21:3 ► pp. 291 ff.
2019. Referential and pragmatic-discourse properties of Lithuanian reference impersonals: 2sg-imp, 3-imp and ma/ta-imp. Kalbotyra 72 ► pp. 32 ff.
Mihatsch, Wiltrud
2015. Referenzielle Besonderheiten von Nominalphrasen mit hombre und persona in altspanischen Rechtstexten. In Historische Sprachwissenschaft als philologische Kulturwissenschaft, ► pp. 579 ff.
Notarius, Tania
2022. Passive, Stative, and Impersonal in Ugaritic: The G-stem Internal Passive Reconsidered. Journal for Semitics 31:1
Notarius, Tania
2022. Impersonal Verbal Constructions in Biblical Hebrew: Active, Stative, and Passive. Journal for Semitics 30:2
2016. Interpretación y tipología del pronombre indefinido uno a partir de tres géneros discursivos. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 67 ► pp. 227 ff.
2022.
Tu quoque?! On the second person pronoun tusya (tus̱a) and the second person verbal ending -tu (-du) in Niya Prakrit. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 9:1-2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Tronci, Liana
2022. Impersonal Constructions Between
Personae
and ‘Personlessness’. Strategies of Language Manipulation in Aeschines and Demosthenes. Trends in Classics 14:2 ► pp. 318 ff.
2022. How Style Met the City. Trends in Classics 14:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
Wahlström, Max
2019. A speech corpus study of two impersonal strategies in Bulgarian and Croatian. Balcanica :15 ► pp. 56 ff.
Wilde, Christopher P.
2020. On Translating the Impersonal First-Person Plural. The Bible Translator 71:2 ► pp. 236 ff.
ZEIJLSTRA, HEDDE
2015. Let's talk about you and me. Journal of Linguistics 51:2 ► pp. 465 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.