Over recent decades the Italian word tipo (Eng. type) has developed numerous non-nominal uses. This paper seeks to address the issue of whether synchronic variation in the use of tipo reflects diachronic development. Findings indicate that, (1) the complex path of grammaticalization of tipo led to the availability of new signs for the expression of vagueness and approximation; (2) the distribution of different non-nominal uses of tipo varies in relation to different dimensions, the most relevant of which is the textual and register variation; (3) the co-presence of multiple meanings and functions of non-nominal tipo does not result in fuzzy morphosyntactic boundaries between different uses of the word, and differences between specific instances of tipo can be represented in terms of prototypical vs. less prototypical realization of categories.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.