Article published in:Language Description Informed by Theory
Edited by Rob Pensalfini, Myfany Turpin and Diana Guillemin
[Studies in Language Companion Series 147] 2014
► pp. 319–336
The case of the invisible postman
The current status of the French future tense
Three somewhat conflicting semantic theories of the Futur Simple (FS) in spoken European French are discussed here: Fleischman’s (1982) “diachronic model”, which portrays the current semantics of the FS as largely modal; Schrott’s (1997) “conditioning” model, which views both the FS and Futur Composé as temporal and modal exponents selected in terms of context of use; Sokol’s (1999) “aspectual model” which sees the FS not as a tense but as a perfective aspect marker interacting with different verb action-classes. Evidence from empirical work relating to these theories does not support the modal view of the FS, and raises some questions for the aspectual model. Robust support emerges, however, for the FS as a future tense.
Published online: 28 January 2014
Bybee, Joan L, Perkins, Revere D.
Damourette, Jacques & Pichon, Edouard
. 1931–36. Des mots à la pensée , Vol. 5 Verbe . Paris: Éditions d’Artrey.
Emirkanian, Louisette & Sankoff, David
Gobert, David & Maisier, Véronique
Gougenheim, Georges, Rivenc, Paul
Huddleston, Rodney D. & Pullum, Geoffrey
Poplack, Shana & Dion, Nathalie
Reid, Thomas Bertram Wallace
1982. The rise of aller and Infinitive as a Periphrastic future. PhD dissertation, Monash University.
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.