Article published in:
Language Description Informed by Theory
Edited by Rob Pensalfini, Myfany Turpin and Diana Guillemin
[Studies in Language Companion Series 147] 2014
► pp. 337–358

Manner and result

A view from clean

As a deadjectival verb, English clean should be a clear-cut result verb, yet it often shows hallmarks of a manner verb. This paper investigates this dual behavior in light of manner/result complementarity: the proposal that verbs lexicalize either manner or result meaning components, but not both. We demonstrate that once lexicalized and contextually determined meaning components are distinguished, clean conforms to manner/result complementarity. It can be a result verb, not entailing a particular manner. However, given its strong association with cleaning routines, some uses simply lexicalize manner. Crucially, in manner uses the result drops out, consistent with manner/result complementarity. The manner-only and result-only uses of clean, then, instantiate related senses, each conforming to manner/result complementarity.
Published online: 28 January 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.147.14lev
References

References

Arsenijević, Boban
. 2010. On the syntactic nature of manner-incorporation. Ms, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
Beavers, John
. 2008. Scalar complexity and the structure of events. In Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation , Johannes Dölling, Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow & Martin Schäfer (eds.), 245–265. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brisson, Christine
. 1994. The licensing of unexpressed objects in English verbs. In Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , 1: The Main Session , 90–102. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1970. The grammar of hitting and breaking. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar , Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 120–133. Waltham MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure . Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2001. Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted: The role of information structure in argument distribution. Language Sciences 23: 503–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005. Constructions, lexical semantics and the Correspondence Principle: Accounting for generalizations and subregularities in the realization of arguments. In The Syntax of Aspect , Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds), 215–236. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guerssel, Mohamed, Hale, Kenneth, Laughren, Mary, Levin, Beth & White Eagle, Josie
. 1985. A cross-linguistic study of transitivity alternations. In Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity , 48–63. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth
. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in ‘degree achievements’. In Proceedings of SALT 9 , Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (eds), 127–144. Ithaca NY: Cornell Linguistics Circle Publications.Google Scholar
Kearns, Kate
. 2007. Telic senses of deadjectival verbs. Lingua 117: 27–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher
. 2001. Polar opposition and the ontology of ‘degrees’. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 33–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth
. 2008. Measure of change: The adjectival core of verbs of variable telicity. In Adjectives and Adverbs in Semantics and Discourse , Louise McNally & Christopher Kennedy (eds), 156–182. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & McNally, Louise
. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language 81: 345–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew & Beavers, John
. 2012. Manner and result in roots of verbal meaning. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 331–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laughren, Mary
. 1988. Towards a lexical representation of Warlpiri verbs. In Thematic Relations [Syntax and Semantics 21], Wendy Wilkins (ed.), 215–242. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
. 1991. Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration. Cognition 41: 123–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. 1992. The lexical semantics of verbs of motion: The perspective from unaccusativity. In Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar , Ignacio M. Roca (ed.), 247–269. Berlin: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-lexical Semantics Interface . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Constraints on the complexity of verb meaning and VP structure. In Between 40 and 60 Puzzles for Krifka , Hans-Martin Gärtner, Regine Eckardt, Renate Musan & Barbara Stiebels(eds.). <http://​www​.zas​.gwz​-berlin​.de​/40–60​-puzzles​-for​-krifka/>
. 2013. Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In The Subatomic Semantics of Event Predicates , Boban Arsenijevic, Berit Gehrke & Rafael Marín (eds), 49–70. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume & Acedo-Matellán, Víctor
. 2012. The manner/result complementarity revisited: A syntactic approach. In The End of Argument Structure , María Cristina Cuervo & Yves Roberge (eds), 209–228. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mittwoch, Anita
. 2005. Unspecified arguments in episodic and habitual sentences. In The Syntax of Aspect , Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds.), 237–254. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka
. 2008. Lexicalized meaning and the internal temporal structure of events. In Crosslinguistic and Theoretical Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 110], Susan D. Rothstein (ed.), 13–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
. 1998. Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors , Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2005. Change of state verbs: Implications for theories of argument projection. In The Syntax of Aspect , Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds), 274–286. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure , Edit Doron, Malka Rappaport Hovav & Ivy Sichel (eds.), 21–38. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface , Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj & Tal Siloni (eds.), 150–176. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Susan
. 2004. Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Aspect . Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schalley, Andrea C.
2004. Cognitive Modeling and Verbal Semantics: A Representational Framework Based on UML . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
. 2000. Towards a Cognitive Semantics , II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tenny, Carol L.
1994. Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface . Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Leek, Frederike
. 1996. The English conative construction: A compositional account. In Papers from the 32nd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , 1: The Main Session , 363–378. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2019.  In Encoding Motion Events in Mandarin Chinese [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 11], Crossref logo
Pross, Tillmann
2020. Dispositions and the verbal description of their manifestations: a case study on Emission Verbs. Linguistics and Philosophy 43:2 ► pp. 149 ff. Crossref logo
Spathas, Giorgos & Dimitris Michelioudakis
2020. States in the decomposition of verbal predicates. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.