Article published in:
Modes of Modality: Modality, typology, and universal grammar
Edited by Elisabeth Leiss and Werner Abraham
[Studies in Language Companion Series 149] 2014
► pp. 291316
References

References

Abraham, Werner
1991Discourse particles in German: How does their illocutive force come about? In Discourse Particles: Descriptive and Theoretical Investigations on the Logical, Syntactic and Pragmatic Properties of Discourse Particles in German [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed.), 203–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Diskurspartikel zwischen Modalität, Modus und Fremdbewusstseinsabgleich. In 40 Jahre Partikelforschung, Theo Harden & Elke Hentschel (eds), 33–77. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2012aSatzabhängigkeit und Fremdbewusstseinsabgleich. In Discourse and Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of Valéria Molnár, Johan Brandtler; David Håkansson; Stefan Huber & Eva Klingvall (eds), 1–27. Lund: University of Lund.Google Scholar
2012bSprecherdeixis und Merkmaldistributionsdifferential deutscher Modalitätselemente. Deutsche Sprache 2012(1): 72–95.Google Scholar
2012cStrong modality and truth disposability in syntactic subordination: What is the locus of the phase edge validating modal adverbials? (to appear 2014 In Studia Linguistica).Google Scholar
Antomo, Mailin & Steinbach, Markus
2010Desintegration und Interpretation: Weil-V2-Sätze an der Schnittstelle zwischen Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29: 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asbach-Schnitker, Brigitte
1977Die Satzpartikel wohl: Eine Untersuchung ihrer Verwendungsbedingungen im Deutschen und ihrer Wiedergabemöglichkeiten im Englischen. In Aspekte der Modalpartikeln: Studien zur deutschen Abtönung, Harald Weydt (ed.), 38–61. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2011Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: Ihre Distribution und Lizenzierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen [Studia Grammatica 73]. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald
1967Causal relations. Journal of Philosophy 64: 691–703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Christopher, Potts, Christopher & Speas, Margaret
2007The pragmatic values of evidential sentences. In Proceedings of SALT 17, Masayuki Gibson & Tova Friedman (eds), 71–88. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1979Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob
1892Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik, NF 100: 25–50.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner
2011Peripheral adverbial clauses, their licensing and the prefield in German. In Satzverknüpfung: Zur Interaktion von Form, Bedeutung und Diskursfunktion, Eva Breindl, Gisella Ferraresi & Anna Volodina (eds), 41–77. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick
To appear. German ‘doch’: An element that triggers a contrast presupposition. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 46. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.
Haegeman, Liliane
2003Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18: 317–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116: 1651–1669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua 120: 628–648. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012The syntax of MCP: Deriving the truncation account. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 113–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert
2000Adverb placement – convergence of structure and licensing. Theoretical Linguistics 26: 95–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The Syntax of German. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heycock, Caroline
2005Embedded root phenomena. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax 2, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 174–209. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra
A 1973On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4): 465–497.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2012Embedding speech acts. In Recursion in language and cognition, Tom Roeper & Margaret Speas (eds).Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1974Syntactic amalgams. CLS 10: 321–344.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard
2004Sentence-final adverbs and ‘scope.’ In Proceedings of NELS 34, Keir Moulton & Matthew Wolf (eds), 23–43. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard & Sawada, Miyuki
2012Root transformations and quantificational structure. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 47–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg
1994Modaler Kontrast und konzeptuelle Verschiebung: Studien zur Syntax und Semantik deutscher Modalpartikeln [Linguistische Arbeiten 314]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pittner, Karin
1999Adverbiale im Deutschen: Untersuchungen zu ihrer Stellung und Interpretation. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2005The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga
1997Zum syntaktischen Status unselbständiger Verbzweit-Sätze. In Christa Dürscheid, Karl Heinz Ramers & Monika Schwarz (eds), Sprache im Fokus. Festschrift für Heinz Vater zum 65. Geburtstag, 121–144. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2006Is German V-to-C movement really semantically motivated? Some empirical problems. Theoretical Linguistics 32(3): 369–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe
2007Expressive presuppositions. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2): 237–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, Eric
2006Interactions with Context. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Sæbø, Kjell Johan
1991Causal and purposive clauses. In Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 6], Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 623–631. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thurmair, Maria
1989Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanderveken, Daniel
1990Meaning and Speech Acts, Vol. 1: Principles of Language Use. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2004Zum ‘Wohl’: Diskurspartikeln als Satztypmodifikatoren. Linguistische Berichte 199: 253–286.Google Scholar
2008Discourse particles in the left periphery. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 200–231. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011Discourse particles. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 33.2], Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 2011–2038. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Tan, Jennifer & Johannes Mursell
2018.  In Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 197],  pp. 185 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.