Modal particles in causal clauses
The case of German weil wohl
Frank Sode | Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
It is well-known that modal particles are not only licensed in root clauses, but also in a proper subset of embedded clauses. However, most existing accounts are primarily concerned with syntactic licensing conditions of modal particles in embedded clauses, while their semantic aspects remain relatively unexplored. This article focuses on a particularly intriguing set of cases in which the commitment-weakening German modal particle wohl occurs in veridical contexts created by the causal connective weil, as in Er hat ein schlechtes Gewissen, weil er wohl gelogen hat. We argue that this combination gives rise to a rather complex interpretation that is unexpected given standard assumptions about modal particles and causal clauses, schematically ‘p and assume(speaker)(q) and (if q then cause(q)(p))’ for sentences of the form ‘p weil wohl q’, and we sketch a possible route for compositional interpretation of these constructions in a dynamic framework based on speaker commitments.
References (41)
References
Abraham, Werner. 2010. Diskurspartikel zwischen Modalität, Modus und Fremdbewusstseinsabgleich. In 40 Jahre Partikelforschung, Theo Harden & Elke Hentschel (eds), 33–77. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Abraham, Werner. 2012a. Satzabhängigkeit und Fremdbewusstseinsabgleich. In Discourse and Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of Valéria Molnár, Johan Brandtler; David Håkansson; Stefan Huber & Eva Klingvall (eds), 1–27. Lund: University of Lund.
Abraham, Werner. 2012b. Sprecherdeixis und Merkmaldistributionsdifferential deutscher Modalitätselemente. Deutsche Sprache 2012(1): 72–95.
Abraham, Werner. 2012c. Strong modality and truth disposability in syntactic subordination: What is the locus of the phase edge validating modal adverbials? (to appear 2014 In Studia Linguistica).
Antomo, Mailin & Steinbach, Markus. 2010. Desintegration und Interpretation: Weil-V2-Sätze an der Schnittstelle zwischen Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29: 1–37.
Asbach-Schnitker, Brigitte. 1977. Die Satzpartikel wohl: Eine Untersuchung ihrer Verwendungsbedingungen im Deutschen und ihrer Wiedergabemöglichkeiten im Englischen. In Aspekte der Modalpartikeln: Studien zur deutschen Abtönung, Harald Weydt (ed.), 38–61. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Coniglio, Marco. 2011. Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: Ihre Distribution und Lizenzierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen [Studia Grammatica 73]. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Davidson, Donald. 1967. Causal relations. Journal of Philosophy 64: 691–703.
Davis, Christopher, Potts, Christopher & Speas, Margaret. 2007. The pragmatic values of evidential sentences. In Proceedings of SALT 17, Masayuki Gibson & Tova Friedman (eds), 71–88. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik, NF 100: 25–50.
Frey, Werner. 2011. Peripheral adverbial clauses, their licensing and the prefield in German. In Satzverknüpfung: Zur Interaktion von Form, Bedeutung und Diskursfunktion, Eva Breindl, Gisella Ferraresi & Anna Volodina (eds), 41–77. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Grosz, Patrick. To appear. German ‘doch’: An element that triggers a contrast presupposition. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 46. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2003. Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18: 317–339.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2006. Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116: 1651–1669.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2010. The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua 120: 628–648.
Haider, Hubert. 2000. Adverb placement – convergence of structure and licensing. Theoretical Linguistics 26: 95–134.
Haider, Hubert. 2010. The Syntax of German. Cambridge: CUP.
Heycock, Caroline. 2005. Embedded root phenomena. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax 2, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 174–209. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4): 465–497.
Krifka, Manfred. 2012. Embedding speech acts. In Recursion in language and cognition, Tom Roeper & Margaret Speas (eds).
Lakoff, George. 1974. Syntactic amalgams. CLS 10: 321–344.
Larson, Richard. 2004. Sentence-final adverbs and ‘scope.’ In Proceedings of NELS 34, Keir Moulton & Matthew Wolf (eds), 23–43. Amherst MA: GLSA.
Larson, Richard & Sawada, Miyuki. 2012. Root transformations and quantificational structure. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 47–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Meibauer, Jörg. 1994. Modaler Kontrast und konzeptuelle Verschiebung: Studien zur Syntax und Semantik deutscher Modalpartikeln [Linguistische Arbeiten 314]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Pittner, Karin. 1999. Adverbiale im Deutschen: Untersuchungen zu ihrer Stellung und Interpretation. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: OUP.
Reis, Marga. 1997. Zum syntaktischen Status unselbständiger Verbzweit-Sätze. In Christa Dürscheid, Karl Heinz Ramers & Monika Schwarz (eds), Sprache im Fokus. Festschrift für Heinz Vater zum 65. Geburtstag, 121–144. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Reis, Marga. 2006. Is German V-to-C movement really semantically motivated? Some empirical problems. Theoretical Linguistics 32(3): 369–380.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Schlenker, Philippe. 2007. Expressive presuppositions. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2): 237–245.
Swanson, Eric. 2006. Interactions with Context. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Sæbø, Kjell Johan. 1991. Causal and purposive clauses. In Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 6], Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 623–631. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Thurmair, Maria. 1989. Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Vanderveken, Daniel. 1990. Meaning and Speech Acts, Vol. 1: Principles of Language Use. Cambridge: CUP.
Zimmermann, Malte. 2004. Zum ‘Wohl’: Diskurspartikeln als Satztypmodifikatoren. Linguistische Berichte 199: 253–286.
Zimmermann, Malte. 2008. Discourse particles in the left periphery. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 200–231. London: Routledge.
Zimmermann, Malte. 2011. Discourse particles. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 33.2], Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 2011–2038. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur & Łukasz Jędrzejowski
Tan, Jennifer & Johannes Mursell
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.