Cover not available
Part of
Modes of Modality: Modality, typology, and universal grammar
Edited by Elisabeth Leiss and Werner Abraham
[Studies in Language Companion Series 149] 2014
► pp. 353–376

The modal category of sufficiency

| Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
This paper deals with constructions which express a notion of ‘sufficiency’. The presence of a degree quantifier such as enough, too, excessively or suffice constitutes their defining feature. On the proposed analysis, these constructions establish a relation of ‘necessity’ between the element that is in the scope of the quantifier and the state of affairs, specified in a complement clause or recoverable from the context, with respect to which the evaluation of sufficiency has to be interpreted. The study I present builds on this covert component of modal necessity and drawing on previous approaches explores the ways in which the relation of the sufficiency operators to possible worlds may be reconciled with their evaluating function in the real world.
Published online: 24 January 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.149.12mel
References (17)
References
Abraham, Werner. 2012. Covert modality in typology. In Covert Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 386–439. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1989. The semantics of gradation. In Dimensional Adjectives. Grammatical Structure and Conceptual Interpretation, Manfred Bierwisch & Ewald Lang (eds), 71–261. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick. 1992. Grammaire du sens et de l’expression. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof, Egerland, Verner & Jonas, Dianne. 2012. Enough! A comparative study of clausal adverbials in English and Swedish. In Discourse and Grammar. A Festschrift in Honor of Valéria Molnár, Johan Brandtler, David Hakansson, Susan Huber & Eva Klingvall (eds), 179–192. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
Di Tullio, Angela. 2007. Manual de gramática del español, 2d. edn. Buenos Aires: La isla de la luna.Google Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine. 2005. Aspects of too and enough constructions. In Proceedings of SALT 15, Effi Georgala & Jonathan Howell (eds), 80–97. Ithaca N.Y.: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 2000. Degree operators and scope. In Proceedings of SALT 10, Brendan Jackson & Tanya Matthews (eds), 214–239. Ithaca NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. Implicative verbs. Language 47(2): 340–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. What “must” and “can” must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(1): 337–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marques, Rui. 2012. Covert modals and (non-)implicative readings of too/enough constructions. In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 238–266. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Meier, Cécile. 2003. The meaning of too, enough, and so…that . Natural Language Semantics 11: 69–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Melis, Chantal. 2011. Los verbos de suficiencia. Lingüística Mexicana 6(2).Google Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sánchez López, Cristina. 1999. Los cuantificadores: Clases de cuantificadores y estructuras cuantificativas. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, I, Vol. 1, Ch. 16, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 1025–1128. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, ter Meulen, Alice, Snitzer Reilly, Judy & Ferguson, Charles A. (eds). 1986. On Conditionals. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Fintel, Kai & Iatridou, Sabine. 2007. Anatomy of a modal construction. Linguistic Inquiry 38(3): 445–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Melis, Chantal
2020. Form and meaning in the development of verbal polysemy. In Changes in Meaning and Function [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 25], ► pp. 174 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.