References (27)
References
Butler, Christopher, S. 2009. Criteria of adequacy in functional linguistics. Folia Linguistia: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae 42(1): 1–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Christopher S. & Arista, Javier Martín (eds). 2009. Deconstructing Constructions [Studies in language Companion Series 107]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diedrichsen, Elke. 2010. Towards a reconsideration of Constructional Schemas in RRG: Are all constructions driven by “constructions”? In Proceedings of the 10th International RRG Conference (RRG 2009) , Wataru Nakamura (ed.), 52–79. <[URL]>
. 2012. The Theoretical Importance of Constructional Schemas in RRG . In New perspectives in Role and Reference Grammar , Wataru Nakamura (ed.), 168–199. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure . Chicago Il: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Labrou, Yannis & Finin, Tim. 1994. A semantics approach to KQML - A general purpose communication language for software agents. In CIKM '94 - Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management , 447–455. New York NY: ACM. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mairal Usón, Ricardo & Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco. 2009. Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction. In Deconstructing Constructions [Studies in Language Companion Series 107], Christopher S. Butler & J. Martín Arista (eds), 153–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. 2006. Construction Grammar. In The Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics , 2nd edn, Vol. 3, Keith Brown (ed.), 73–84. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2010. Construction Grammar: The facts on the ground. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis , Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Murtagh, Irene. 2011. Towards an RRG-enabled Sign Language avatar. Paper presented at the International Conference on Role and Reference Grammar on “Functional Linguistics: Grammar, Communication & Cognition”. Facultad de Letras, at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, in Santiago de Chile.
Nolan, Brian. 2011a. Characterising the effects of the referential hierarchy on Modern Irish ditransitive constructions. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Referential Hierarchies in three-participant constructions. The University of Lancaster, England.Google Scholar
. 2011b. Meaning Construction and Grammatical Inflection in the Layered Structure of the Irish Word: An RRG Account of Morphological Constructions. In New perspectives in Role and Reference Grammar , Wataru Nakamura (ed.), 64–103. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
. 2011c. Constructions as grammatical objects. Paper presented at the International Conference on Role and Reference Grammar on “Functional Linguistics: Grammar, Communication & Cognition”. Facultad de Letras, at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, in Santiago de Chile.
. 2011d. Constructional templates at the morphology-lexicon interface – meaning and the layered structure of the Irish word. Paper presented at the workshop on Meaning construction at the crossroads of grammar, cognition and communication. Societas Linguistica Europaea, University of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain.
. 2012a. The Syntax of Irish: A Functional Account . Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
. 2012b. Constructions as grammatical objects: A new perspective on constructions in RRG. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Meaning in FunGramKB and LCM. Facultad de Filología, at the Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), in Madrid, Spain.
. 2013. Constructional polysemy and argument realisation with the Irish GET verb. In Argument Structures in Flux: The Naples/Capri Papers [Studies in Language Companion Series 131], Elly van Gelderen, Johanna Barðdal & Michaela Cennamo (eds), 87–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nolan, Brian & Diedrichsen, Elke. 2013. Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics. The Role of Constructions in Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 145]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nolan, Brian, Mairal-Uson, Ricardo & Perináañn, Carlos. 2009. Natural language processing applications in an RRG Framework. In Proceedings of the 10th International Role and Reference Grammar Conference . University of California, Berkeley USA.Google Scholar
Nolan, Brian & Salem, Yasser. 2011. UniArab: RRG Arabic-to-English Machine Translation. In New Perspectives in Role and Reference Grammar , Wataru Nakamura (ed.), 312–346. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Periñán-Pascual, Carlos & Arcas Túnez, Francisco. 2007. Cognitive modules of an NLP knowledge base for language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 39: 197–204.Google Scholar
2010. The architecture of FunGramKB. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation , European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2667–2674.
Periñán-Pascual, Carlos & Mairal Usón, Ricardo. 2009. Bringing Role and Reference Grammar to natural language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 43: 265–273.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco & Mairal Uson, Ricardo. 2011. Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: An introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model. Folia Linguisticia 42: 355–400.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar