Part of
Language Processing and Grammars: The role of functionally oriented computational models
Edited by Brian Nolan and Carlos Periñán-Pascual
[Studies in Language Companion Series 150] 2014
► pp. 297312
References (49)
References
Amaro, Raquel. 2005. Semantic incorporation in a Portuguese WordNet of verbs of movement: On aktionsart shifting. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon , 1–9. Genève: University of Genève.Google Scholar
Bergenholtz, Henning & Tarp, Sven. 2010. LSP Lexicography or Terminography? The lexicographer’s point of view. In Specialised Dictionaries for Learners [Lexicographica Series Maior], Pedro A. Fuertes-Olivera (ed.), 26–37. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boons, Jean-Paul. 1987. La notion sémantique de déplacement dans une classification syntaxique des verbes locatifs. Langue Française 76: 5–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busch-Lauer, Ines-Andrea. 1995. Textual organization in English and German medical abstracts. In Organization in Discourse. Proceedings from the Turku Conference [Anglicana Turkuensia 14], Brita Warvik, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen & Risto Hiltunen (eds), 175–185. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Anjan, Southwood, M. Helen & Basilico, David. 1999. Verbs, events and spatial representations. Neuropsychologia 37: 395–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1977. Principios de semántica estructural . Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 1989. The brain binds entities and events by multiregional activation from convergence zones. Neural Computation 1: 123–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damasio, Hanna, Tranel, Daniel, Grabowski, Tomas, Adolphs, Ralph & Damasio, Antonio. 2004. Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval. Cognition 92(1–2): 179–229. DOI logo
Dik, Simon. 1978a. Functional Grammar , Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1978b. Stepwise Lexical Decomposition . Lisse: Peter de Ridder.Google Scholar
Faber, Pamela & Mairal, Ricardo. 1999. Constructing a Lexicon of English Verbs . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela (ed.). 2012 A Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Language . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela, León, Pilar, Prieto, Juan Antonio & Reimerink, Arianne. 2007. Linking images and words: The description of specialized concepts.   International Journal of Lexicography 20: 39–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela, Montero, Silvia, Castro, Rosa, Senso, José, Prieto, Juan Antonio, León, Pilar, Márquez, Carlos & Vega, Miguel. 2006. Process-oriented terminology management in the domain of coastal engineering Terminology  12: 189–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane. 1990. English verbs as a semantic net. International Journal of Lexicography 3: 278–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles, Johnson, Christopher R. & Petruck, Miriam R.L. 2003. Background to Framenet. International Journal of Lexicography 16: 235–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1982. Frame Semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm , Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.),111–37. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica VI(2): 222–254.Google Scholar
. 2003. Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography 16: 235–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Frame Semantics. In Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings , Dirk Geeraerts (ed.), 373–400. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frath Pierre & Gledhill, Christopher. 2005. Qu'est-ce qu'une unité phraséologique? Cahiers de l'Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 31(2–4):11–25.Google Scholar
Gledhill, Christopher. 2000. Collocations in Science Writing . Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Gross Gaston. 1994. Classes d’objets et description des verbes. Langages 115: 15–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind . Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kleiber, Georges & Tamba, Irene. 1990. L’hyponymie revisitée: Inclusion et hiérarchie. Langages 25(98): 7–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
L’Homme, Marie-Claude. 2006. The processing of terms in dictionaries: New models and techniques. A state of the art. Terminology 12: 181–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind . Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López Rodríguez, Clara Inés, Faber, Pamela, León, Pilar, Prieto, Juan Antonio, & Tercedor, Maribel. 2010. La Terminología basada en marcos y su aplicación a las Ciencias Ambientales: Los proyectos Marcocosta y Ecosistema. Arena Romanistica 7: 52–74.Google Scholar
Mairal, Ricardo & Faber, Pamela. 2007. Lexical templates within a functional cognitive theory of meaning. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 5: 137–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mairal, Ricardo & Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José. 2008. New challenges for lexical representations within the Lexical-Constructional Model (LCM). Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 57: 137–158.Google Scholar
. 2009. Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction. In Deconstruction Constructions [Studies in Language Companion Series 107], Christopher S. Butler & J. Martín Arista (eds), 153–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Mingorance, Leocadio. 1998 [1985]. Bases metodológicas para un estudio contrastivo del léxico derivado. In El Modelo Lexemático Funcional , Amalia Martín Rubiales (ed.), 61–82. Granada: Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
. 1984. Lexical fields and stepwise lexical deconstruction in a contrastive English-Spanish verb valency dictionary. In LEXeter 83: Proceedings of the International Conference on Lexicography , Reinhart Hartmann (ed.), 226–236. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 1990. Functional grammar and lexematics. In Meaning and Lexicography [Linguistic and Literary Studies in Eastern Europe 28], Jerzy Tomaszczyk & Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 227–253. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Lexical logic and structural semantics: Methodological underpinnings in the structuring of a lexical database for natural language processing. In Panorama der Lexikalischen Semantik , Ulrich Hoinkes (ed.), 461–474. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor 1996. Lexical functions: A tool for the description of lexical relations in the lexicon. In Lexical Functions in Lexicography and Natural Language Processing [Studies in Language Companion Series 31], Leo Wanner (ed.), 37–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor, Clas, André & Polguère, Alain. 1995. Introduction à la lexicologie explicative et combinatoire . Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Google Scholar
Miller George & Fellbaum, Christiane. 1991. Semantic networks of English. Cognition 41: 197–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patterson Karalyn, Nestor, Peter J & Rogers, Timothy T. 2007. Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 8: 975–987.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. & Mairal Usón, Ricardo. 2008. Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: an introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model. Folia Linguistica 42: 355–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez Cárdenas, Beatriz. 2010. Paramètres linguistiques pour la constitution d’un dictionnaire électronique bilingue (français/espagnol) destiné à la traduction. Le cas des verbes de comptage . Granada: University of Granada.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. Language typology and lexical descriptions. In Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon , Vol. 3, Timothy Shopen, 36–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tranel, Daniel, Adolphs, Ralph, Damasio, Hanna, & Damasio, Antonio R. 2001. A neural basis for the retrieval of words for actions. Cognitive Neuropsychology 18: 655–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D. (ed.). 1992. A synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar. In Advances in Role and Reference Grammar [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 82]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy. 1997 Syntax: Structure, Meaning & Function . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy . Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1995. Universal semantic primitives as a basis for lexical semantics. Folia Lingüística 29(1–2): 149–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Sánchez-Cárdenas, Beatriz & Cécile Frérot
2021. Vers un modèle d’analyse des verbes semi-spécialisés. Le cas de traiter/treat dans les domaines médical et environnemental. In Des corpus numériques à l’analyse linguistique en langues de spécialité,  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez Cárdenas, Beatriz & Carlos Ramisch
2019. Eliciting specialized frames from corpora using argument-structure extraction techniques. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 25:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.