Article published in:
Language Processing and Grammars: The role of functionally oriented computational models
Edited by Brian Nolan and Carlos Periñán-Pascual
[Studies in Language Companion Series 150] 2014
► pp. 297–312

A functional and constructional approach for specialized knowledge resources

| University of Granada
| University of Granada
This paper describes how verbs are represented in EcoLexicon (ecolexicon.ugr.es), a specialized knowledge resource in environmental science. Based on the hypothesis that human cognition organizes concepts in semantic categories (Tranel et al. 2001; H. Damasio et al. 2004), verbs are conceptually structured in lexical domains (Mingorance 1985, 1900, 1995; Faber & Mairal 1999). These domains are based on the premises of the Lexical Grammar Model (Faber & Mairal 1999). Once the members of a lexical domain are specified, the conceptual structure of the domain is mapped out. Semantic categories are thus organized in a tangled hierarchy. The semantic relation of troponymy (Fellbaum 1990; Miller & Fellbaum 1991) determines the hierarchical structure of verbal lexical domains. The third step consists in the design of a lexical template based on the principles of the Lexical Constructional Model (Ruiz de Mendoza & Mairal 2008, Mairal & Ruiz de Mendoza 2009). Each lexical template consists of the following: (a) an Aktionsart module according to Role and Reference Grammar (Van Valin 1993, 2005, Van Valin & LaPolla 1997) in which the actantial structure of verbs is established; (b) a semantic module that specifies the thematic relations (Van Valin 2005), macroroles and types of noun selected by each verb. The French and English verbs of movement in the field of Volcanology are analyzed as an illustration of this method.
Published online: 01 April 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.150.12san
References

References

Amaro, Raquel
2005 Semantic incorporation in a Portuguese WordNet of verbs of movement: On aktionsart shifting. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon , 1–9. Genève: University of Genève.Google Scholar
Bergenholtz, Henning & Tarp, Sven
2010 LSP Lexicography or Terminography? The lexicographer’s point of view. In Specialised Dictionaries for Learners [Lexicographica Series Maior], Pedro A. Fuertes-Olivera (ed.), 26–37. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boons, Jean-Paul
1987 La notion sémantique de déplacement dans une classification syntaxique des verbes locatifs. Langue Française 76: 5–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Busch-Lauer, Ines-Andrea
1995 Textual organization in English and German medical abstracts. In Organization in Discourse. Proceedings from the Turku Conference [Anglicana Turkuensia 14], Brita Warvik, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen & Risto Hiltunen (eds), 175–185. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Anjan, Southwood, M. Helen & Basilico, David.
1999 Verbs, events and spatial representations. Neuropsychologia 37: 395–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1977  Principios de semántica estructural . Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio
1989 The brain binds entities and events by multiregional activation from convergence zones. Neural Computation 1: 123–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, Hanna, Tranel, Daniel, Grabowski, Tomas, Adolphs, Ralph & Damasio, Antonio
2004 Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval. Cognition 92(1–2): 179–229. Crossref
Dik, Simon
1978a  Functional Grammar , Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1978b  Stepwise Lexical Decomposition . Lisse: Peter de Ridder.Google Scholar
Faber, Pamela & Mairal, Ricardo
1999  Constructing a Lexicon of English Verbs . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela
(ed) 2012.  A Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Language . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela, León, Pilar, Prieto, Juan Antonio & Reimerink, Arianne.
2007 Linking images and words: The description of specialized concepts.   International Journal of Lexicography 20: 39–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela, Montero, Silvia, Castro, Rosa, Senso, José, Prieto, Juan Antonio, León, Pilar, Márquez, Carlos & Vega, Miguel.
2006 Process-oriented terminology management in the domain of coastal engineering .  Terminology  12: 189–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane
1990 English verbs as a semantic net. International Journal of Lexicography 3: 278–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles, Johnson, Christopher R. & Petruck, Miriam R.L.
2003 Background to Framenet. International Journal of Lexicography 16: 235–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1982 Frame Semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm , Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.),111–37. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
1985 Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica VI(2): 222–254.Google Scholar
2003 Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography 16: 235–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Frame Semantics. In Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings , Dirk Geeraerts (ed.), 373–400. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frath Pierre & Gledhill, Christopher.
2005 Qu'est-ce qu'une unité phraséologique? Cahiers de l'Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 31(2–4):11–25.Google Scholar
Gledhill, Christopher
2000  Collocations in Science Writing . Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Gross Gaston.
1994 Classes d’objets et description des verbes. Langages 115: 15–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.
1987  The Body in the Mind . Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kleiber, Georges & Tamba, Irene
1990 L’hyponymie revisitée: Inclusion et hiérarchie. Langages 25(98): 7–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
L’Homme, Marie-Claude.
2006 The processing of terms in dictionaries: New models and techniques. A state of the art. Terminology 12: 181–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind . Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López Rodríguez, Clara Inés, Faber, Pamela, León, Pilar, Prieto, Juan Antonio, & Tercedor, Maribel
2010 La Terminología basada en marcos y su aplicación a las Ciencias Ambientales: Los proyectos Marcocosta y Ecosistema. Arena Romanistica 7: 52–74.Google Scholar
Mairal, Ricardo & Faber, Pamela
2007 Lexical templates within a functional cognitive theory of meaning. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 5: 137–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mairal, Ricardo & Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José
2008 New challenges for lexical representations within the Lexical-Constructional Model (LCM). Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 57: 137–158.Google Scholar
2009 Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction. In Deconstruction Constructions [Studies in Language Companion Series 107], Christopher S. Butler & J. Martín Arista (eds), 153–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martín Mingorance, Leocadio
1998 [1985] Bases metodológicas para un estudio contrastivo del léxico derivado. In El Modelo Lexemático Funcional , Amalia Martín Rubiales (ed.), 61–82. Granada: Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
1984 Lexical fields and stepwise lexical deconstruction in a contrastive English-Spanish verb valency dictionary. In LEXeter 83: Proceedings of the International Conference on Lexicography , Reinhart Hartmann (ed.), 226–236. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
1990 Functional grammar and lexematics. In Meaning and Lexicography [Linguistic and Literary Studies in Eastern Europe 28], Jerzy Tomaszczyk & Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 227–253. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 Lexical logic and structural semantics: Methodological underpinnings in the structuring of a lexical database for natural language processing. In Panorama der Lexikalischen Semantik , Ulrich Hoinkes (ed.), 461–474. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor
1996 Lexical functions: A tool for the description of lexical relations in the lexicon. In Lexical Functions in Lexicography and Natural Language Processing [Studies in Language Companion Series 31], Leo Wanner (ed.), 37–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor, Clas, André & Polguère, Alain
1995  Introduction à la lexicologie explicative et combinatoire . Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Google Scholar
Miller George & Fellbaum, Christiane
1991 Semantic networks of English. Cognition 41: 197–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patterson Karalyn, Nestor, PeterJ & Rogers, Timothy T.
2007 Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 8: 975–987.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1995  The Generative Lexicon . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. & Mairal Usón, Ricardo
2008 Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: an introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model. Folia Linguistica 42: 355–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez Cárdenas, Beatriz
2010  Paramètres linguistiques pour la constitution d’un dictionnaire électronique bilingue (français/espagnol) destiné à la traduction. Le cas des verbes de comptage . Granada: University of Granada.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. Language typology and lexical descriptions. In Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon , Vol. 3, Timothy Shopen, 36–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tranel, Daniel, Adolphs, Ralph, Damasio, Hanna, & Damasio, Antonio R.
2001 A neural basis for the retrieval of words for actions. Cognitive Neuropsychology 18: 655–674. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D.
(ed.) 1992 A synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar. In Advances in Role and Reference Grammar [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 82]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005  Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy
1997 Syntax: Structure, Meaning & Function . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1967  Linguistics in Philosophy . Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1995 Universal semantic primitives as a basis for lexical semantics. Folia Lingüística 29(1–2): 149–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Sánchez Cárdenas, Beatriz & Carlos Ramisch
2019. Eliciting specialized frames from corpora using argument-structure extraction techniques. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.