The focus of this paper is on the system of aspectual coercion connected
with durative adverbials (like for one day), time-span adverbials (like in ten minutes), and time-point adverbials (like at seven o’clock) as well as the progressive in English and its roots in the domain of eventualities. Aspectual coercions are regarded as operations which are executed in order to prevent a conflict between the aspects of a verbal expression and the aspectual requirements of the context. The meaning resulting from such an adjustment involves material which is not contributed by the constituents but originates from knowledge of eventualities. Thus, leading questions of the paper are what the overall structure of eventualities is and how this structure determines the aspectual meaning of expressions as well as the way in which it can be contextually shifted. Recurring to prior work in the field of research, several sorts of eventuality and general relations that exist between eventualities of different sorts are distinguished. On this basis, by examining a sample of data, the paper identifies a multitude of operations for systematically transforming the (e.g., iterative coercion, habitual coercion, inchoative coercion, additive coercion, and subtractive coercion). Finally, taking into account that the operations have basically the same formal structure and, therefore, give reason to generalization, a two-stage approach to aspectual coercion is presented. Its most notably features are that, first, the principle of semantic compositionality is entirely maintained in its validity and, second, adjusting by coercion is turned out to be ultimately a pragmatic phenomenon.
Brennan, Jonathan & Pylkkänen, Liina (2008): “Processing events: Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of aspectual coercion.” Brain & Language 106: 132–143.
Davidson, Donald (1967): “The logical form of action sentences.” In: Nicholas Rescher (ed.) The Logic of Decision and Action, Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. 81–95.
Dölling, Johannes (1995): “Ontological domains, semantic sorts and systematic ambiguity.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43: 785–807.
Dölling, Johannes (1997): “Semantic form and abductive fixation of parameters.” In: Rob van der Sandt, Reinhard Blutner & Manfred Bierwisch (eds.) From Underspecification to Interpretation. Working Papers of the Institute for Logic and Linguistics , Heidelberg: IBM Deutschland. 113–139.
Dölling, Johannes (2003a): “Aspectual (re-)interpretation: Structural representation and processing.” In: Holden Härtl & Heike Tappe (eds.) Mediating between Concepts and Gramma, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 303–322.
Dölling, Johannes (2003b): “Flexibility in adverbial modification: Reinterpretation as contextual enrichment.” In: Ewald Lang, Claudia Maienborn & Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen (eds.) Modifying Adjuncts, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 511–552.
Dölling, Johannes (2005a): “Copula sentences and entailment relations.” Theoretical Linguistics 31: 317–329.
Dölling, Johannes (2005b): “Semantische Form und pragmatische Anreicherung: Situationsausdrücke in der Äußerungsinterpretation.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 24: 159–225.
Dölling, Johannes & Heyde-Zybatow, Tatjana (2007): “Verb meaning: How much semantics is in the lexicon?” In: Andreas Späth (ed.) Interface and Interface Conditions, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 33–75.
Dowty, David (1979): Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of verbs and Times in generative Semantics and in Montagues’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Egg, Markus (1995): “The intergressive as a new category of verbal aktionsart.” Journal of Semantics 12: 311–356.
Egg, Markus (2005): Flexible Semantics for Reinterpretation Phenomena. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.
Engelberg, Stefan (2004): “Lexical event structures for verb semantics.” Journal of Language and Linguistics 3: 62–108.
Filip, Hana (1999): Aspect, Eventuality Types and Nominal Reference. New York: Garland Publishing.
Heyde-Zybatow, Tatjana (2008): “What kind of events do achievements describe?” In: Anita Steube (ed.) The Discourse Potential of Undespecified Structures, Berlin: de Gruyter. 109–144.
Hobbs, Jerry, Stickel, Appelt & Martin, Paul (1993): “Interpretation as abduction.” Artificial Intelligence 63: 69–142.
Jackendoff, Ray (1997): The Architecture of Language Faculty. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe (1993): From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language. Kluwer.
Kratzer, Angelika (1996): “Severing the external argument from its verb.” In: Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.) Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Dordrecht: Kluwer. 109–137.
Krifka, Manfred (1992): “Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution.” In: Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds.) Lexical Matters, Stanford CA: CSLI Publications. 29–53.
Krifka, Manfred (1998): “The origins of telicity.” In: Susan Rothstein (ed.) Events and Grammar, Dordrecht: Kluwer. 197–235.
Link, Godehard (1983): “The logical analysis of plurals and massterms: A lattice-theoretical approach.” In: Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds.) Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language,Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 303–323.
Maienborn, Claudia (2005): “On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences.” Theoretical Linguistics 31: 275–316.
Maienborn, Claudia (2010): “Event semantics.” In: Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.) Semantics. An international Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, volume 1. 802–830.
Moens, Marc & Steedman, Mark (1988): “Temporal ontology and temporal reference.” Computational Linguistics 14: 15–28.
Mourelatos, Alexander P.D. (1978): “Events, processes, and states.” Linguistics and Philosophy 2: 415–434.
Nunberg, Geoffrey (1995): “Transfers of meaning.” Journal of Semantics 12: 109–132.
Parsons, Terence (1990): Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Pickering, Martin J., McElree, Brian, Frisson, Steven, Chen, Lillian & Traxler, Matthew J. (2006): “Underspecification and aspectual coercion.” Discourse Processes 42: 131–155.
Piñango, Maria, Winnick, Rashad, Ullah, Aaron & Zurif, Edgar (2006): “Time-course of semantic composition: The case of aspectual coercion.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35: 233–244.
Piñón, Christopher (1995): “An ontology for event semantics.” Ph.D. thesis, Université de Lille.
Piñón, Christopher (1997): “Achievements in an event semantics.” In: Aaron Lawson & Eun Cho (eds.)
Proceedings of SALT VII
. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University, 273–296.
Piñón, Christopher (2008): “Verbs of creation.” In: Johannes Dölling, Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow & Martin Schäfer (eds.) Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 493–521.
Pulman, Stephen (1997): “Aspectual shift as type coercion.” Transactions of the Philological Society 95: 279–317.
Pustejovsky, James (1991): “The syntax of event structure.” Cognition 41: 47–81.
Pustejovsky, James (1995): The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Pylkkänen, Liina (2008): “Mismatching meanings in brain and behavior.” Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 712–738.
Pylkkänen, Liina & McElree, Brian (2006): “The syntax-semantics interface: On-line composition of sentence meaning.” In: Matthew Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (eds.) Handbook of Psycholinguistics, New York: Elsevier. 537–577.
Rothstein, Susan (2004): Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Rothstein, Susan (2008): “Two puzzles for a theory of lexical aspect: Semelfactives and degree achievements.” In: Johannes Dölling, Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow & Martin Schäfer (eds.) Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation, Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 175–197.
Smith, Carlota (1991): The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
de Swart, Henriëtte (1998): “Aspect shift and coercion.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 347–385.
Vendler, Zeno (1957): “Verbs and times.” Philosophical Review 56: 143–160.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Piñango, Maria M., Yao‐Ying Lai, Ashwini Deo, Emily Foster‐Hanson, Cheryl Lacadie & Todd Constable
2024. Comprehension of English for‐adverbials: The Nature of Lexical Meanings and the Neurocognitive Architecture of Language. Topics in Cognitive Science
Klimek-Jankowska, Dorota, Krzysztof Hwaszcz & Justyna Wieczorek
2022. The Spectrum of Sense Remoteness in Polysemy: Bridging Computational and Theoretical Lexicography with Psycholinguistics (Part 1). Studies in Polish Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
2020. Systematic Polysemy. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Ernst, Thomas
2020. The Syntax of Adverbials. Annual Review of Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 89 ff.
HOGEWEG, LOTTE & AGUSTIN VICENTE
2020. On the nature of the lexicon: The status of rich lexical meanings. Journal of Linguistics 56:4 ► pp. 865 ff.
Spalek, Alexandra Anna & Kjell Johan Sæbø
2019. To Finish in German and Mainland Scandinavian: Telicity and Incrementality. Journal of Semantics 36:2 ► pp. 349 ff.
Sprugnoli, Rachele & Sara Tonelli
2019. Novel Event Detection and Classification for Historical Texts. Computational Linguistics 45:2 ► pp. 229 ff.
Yano, Masataka
2018. Predictive processing of aspectual information: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33:6 ► pp. 718 ff.
LEE, EUNHEE
2017. Discourse properties ofnow. Journal of Linguistics 53:3 ► pp. 613 ff.
Lukassek, Julia, Anna Prysłopska, Robin Hörnig & Claudia Maienborn
2017. The Semantic Processing of Motion Verbs: Coercion or Underspecification?. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46:4 ► pp. 805 ff.
Baggio, Giosuè, Giulia Granello, Lorenzo Verriello & Roberto Eleopra
2016. Formal Semantics in the Neurology Clinic: Atypical Understanding of Aspectual Coercion in ALS Patients. Frontiers in Psychology 7
de Almeida, Roberto G., Levi Riven, Christina Manouilidou, Ovidiu Lungu, Veena D. Dwivedi, Gonia Jarema & Brendan Gillon
2016. The Neuronal Correlates of Indeterminate Sentence Comprehension: An fMRI Study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.