Phases in verbal semantics
The following article deals with phasal verbs, i.e., verbs referring to a special phase of an entire event. Thus, for instance, start refers to the beginning of an event whereas stop and finish focus on an event’s final phase. After a general introduction, I shall show in Section 1.2 that there is a direct line from medieval thinking about event phases to recent semantic theories as they have been developed since the 1960s or so onward. Three influential modern theories are discussed in the second section, namely: (1) Jackendoff’s account of the cognitive mechanism used to delimit events and their initial and final sub-phases; (2) Pustejovsky’s theory of the interaction of phasal verbs with their complements; and (3) Partee and Bennett’s analysis of phasal verbs within their interval semantics. In the main Section 3 I try to integrate these approaches to the semantics of phasal verbs within a more elaborate and comprehensive model for the semantic description of phasal verbs. The discussion will show that a coherent and descriptively adequate analysis of phasal verbs is possible and that phasal verbs must be recognized as constituting a grammatical class at least in the languages discussed here.
References (78)
Bibliography
Anderson, Gregory D.S. (2005):
Auxiliary Verb Constructions
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, John M. (2000): “Auxiliary.” In Booij et al. (2000 and 2004: Vol. I, 808–820).
Apresjan, Jurij D. (1974):
Leksičeskaja semantika: Sinonimičeskie sredstva jazyka
(Lexical Semantics: Synonymic Means of Language)
. Moscow: Nauka.
Aristotle (1957):
The Physics
. London: William Heinemann,revised edition 1960 edition.
Ballmer, Thomas T. & Brennenstuhl, Waltraud (1986):
Deutsche Verben. Eine sprachanalytische Untersuchung des deutschen Verbwortschatzes
. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Barwise, Jon & Perry, John (1984):
Situations and Attitudes
. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Bennett, Michael & Partee, Barbara H. (2004): “Toward the logic of tense and aspect in English.” In: Barbara H. Partee (ed.)
Compositionality in Formal Semantic
, Malden: Blackwell. 59–109.
Booij, Geert, Lehmann, Christian & Mugdan, Joachim (eds.) (2000 and 2004):
Morphologie: ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung
. 2 Volumes. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Brinton, Laurel J. (1988):
The Development of English Aspectual Systems: Aspectualizers and Post-verbal Particles
. Cambridge GB: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Keith (ed.) (2006):
Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics
. Oxford: Elsevier.
Cann, Ronnie (1993):
Formal Semantics: an Introduction
. Cambridge GB: Cambridge University Press.
Chierchia, Gennaro & McConnell-Ginet, Sally (1990):
Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics
. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Croft, William (2000): “Lexical and grammatical meaning.” In Booij et al. (2000 and 2004: Vol. I, 257–263).
Dahl, Östen (1990): “Review of: Brinton (1988).”
Journal of Semantics
7: 115–119.
DeLancey, Scott (2004): “Grammaticalization: from syntax to morphology.” In Booij et al. (2000 and 2004: Vol. II, 1590–1599).
Dowty, David R. (1979):
Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ
. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Dubinsky, Stanley W. & Davies, William D. (2006): “Control and raising.” In Brown (2006: 131–139).
Egg, Markus (2003): “Beginning novels and finishing hamburgers: Remarks on the semantics of to begin.”
Journal of Semantics
20: 163–191.
Engerer, Volkmar (1999): “Phasenverbkomplemente.”
Studia Germanica Universitatis Vesprimiensis
3: 145–159.
Engerer, Volkmar (2000a): “Phasenverbsemantik.” In: Käthi Dorfmüller-Karpusa & Ekaterini Vretta-Panidou (eds.)
Thessaloniker Interkulturelle Analysen. Akten des 33. Linguistischen Kolloquiums in Thessaloniki 1998
.Frankfurt/M., etc.: Peter Lang, 101–110.
Engerer, Volkmar (2000b): “Was lässt sich im Deutschen aufhören und beenden? Aspekt, Aktionsart und nominale Komplementation intervallabschlussdenotierender Phasenverben.”
Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication
19: 171–186.
Engerer, Volkmar (2001): “Phasenverben brauchen Zeit: Die zeitsemantische Verankerung von Satzgliedern.”
Studia Germanica Universitatis Vesprimiensis
5: 5–20.
Engerer, Volkmar (2002): “Faseverbernes tidsbetingelse. Grundtræk af den semantiske beskrivelse af faseverbkonstruktioner.”
Hermes
29: 53–71.
Engerer, Volkmar (2003): “Tid i sprog: aktionsartteoriernes fire grundpiller.”
Tidsskrift for Sprogforskning
1: 21–45.
Engerer, Volkmar (ed.) (2004a):
Form og betydning: Bidrag til syntaks-semantik-interface i sprog og grammatik
. Århus: SB-Tryk.
Engerer, Volkmar (2004b): “Konzeptionen der Syntax-Semantik-Schnittstelle in der Grammatik. Das Verhältnis von Syntax und Semantik in zwei Syntaxen des Deutschen.”
Tidsskrift for Sprogforskning
2: 21–35.
Engerer, Volkmar (2008a): “Phasen, Zustandswechsel und die einfache Phasensemantik.”
Tidsskrift for Sprogforskning
6: 1–17.
Engerer, Volkmar (2008b): “Phasenverben, Zeitbedingung und Zustandswechsel. Phasenbedeutungen in Wortbildung und Lexikon.”
Studia Germanica Universitatis Vesprimiensis
12: 111–125.
Engerer, Volkmar (2008c): “Vorschlag zu einer Systematik der grammatischen Beschreibung von Phasenverben.” In: Karin Pittner (ed.)
Vorträge der 16. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Sprache und Sprachen (Gesus e.V.)
.München: Lincom Europa, 173–182.
Engerer, Volkmar (2009): “Phasenverben und die Dreigliedrigkeit von Phasenaktionsarten in der Wortbildung.”
Sprachwissenschaft
34: 1–30.
Engerer, Volkmar (2010): “Zur zeitlichen Evaluierung von Phasenverben. Das Problem der “leeren Mitte” oder: Wie viele Intervalle braucht die Semantik von Phasenverben?”
Hermes
44: 153–167.
Engerer, Volkmar & Nicolay, Nathalie (1999): “Telizität, Aspekt und Zustandswechsel.” In: Hans Otto Spillmann & Ingo Warnke (eds.)
Internationale Tendenzen der Syntaktik, Semantik und Pragmatik. Akten des 32. Linguistischen Kolloquiums in Kassel 1997.
Frankfurt/M., etc.: Peter Lang, 333–340.
Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine (1975):
Transformative, intransformative und kursive Verben
. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Filip, Hana (2003): “Prefixes and the delimitation of events.”
Journal of Slavic Linguistics
11: 55–101.
Freed, Alice F. (1979):
The Semantics of English Aspectual Complementation
. Dordrecht: Reidel.
García, Erica C. (1967): “Auxiliaries and the criterion of simplicity.”
Language
43: 853–870.
Givón, Talmy (1972): “Forward implications, backward presuppositions, and the time axis of verbs.” In: John P. Kimball (ed.)
Syntax and Semantics
, New York and London: Seminar Press. 29–50.
Givón, Talmy (1973): “The time-axis phenomenon.”
Language
49: 890–925.
Heine, Bernd (1993):
Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization
. New York: Oxford University Press.
Helbig, Gerhard & Buscha, Joachim (1984):
Deutsche Grammatik. Ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht
. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.
Jackendoff, Ray (1986):
Semantics and Cognition
. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray (1991a): “Parts and boundaries.”
Cognition
41: 9–45.
Jackendoff, Ray (1991b):
Semantic Structures
. Cambridge MA: MIT Press,2nd edition.
Jun, J.S. (2006): “Lexical conceptual structure.” In Brown (2006: 69–77).
Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe (1993):
From Discourse to Logic
. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Klima, Gyula (2006): “Syncategoremata.” In Brown (2006: 353–356).
Kretzmann, Norman (1976): “Incipit/desinit.” In: Peter K. Machamer & Robert G. Turnbull (eds.)
Motion and Time, Space and Matter: Interrelations in the History of Philosophy and Science
,Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press. 101–136.
Lamiroy, Beatrice (1987): “The complementation of aspectual verbs in French.”
Language
63: 278–298.
Lieber, Rochelle (2004):
Morphology and lexical semantics
. Cambrdige UK: Cambridge University Press.
Löbner, Sebastian (1990):
Wahr neben Falsch: Duale Operatoren als die Quantoren natürlicher Sprache
. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Lohnstein, Horst (1996):
Formale Semantik und natürliche Sprache. Einführendes Lehrbuch
. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Maisak, Timur (1999): “Multiple periphrastic perfectives: another case of “bounder perfectivization”.” In:
Language Typology. Proceedings of Electronic Conference, May 15–25
. URL [URL].
ter Meulen, Alice G.B. (1995):
Representing Time in Natural Language: The Dynamic Interpretation of Tense and Aspect
. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Moens, Marc & Steedman, Mark (1988): “Temporal ontology and temporal reference.”
Computational Linguistics
14: 15–28.
Mulisch, Herbert (ed.) (1985):
Morphologie
. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. (1987): “Načinatel’nost’ i sredstva ee vyraženija v jazykach raznych tipov (The category of ‘beginning’ and the means for its expressions in languages of different types).” In: Aleksandr V. Bondarko (ed.)
Teorija funkcional’noj grammatiki. Vvedenie. Aspektual’nost’, vremennaja lokalizovannost’, taksis
(Theory of Functional Grammar. Introduction. Aspectuality, Temporal Localisation, Taxis)
, Leningrad: Nauka. 180–195.
Newmeyer, Frederick J. (1975):
English Aspectual Verbs
. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.
Øhrstrøm, Peter & Hasle, Per F.V. (1995):
Temporal Logic. From Ancient Ideas to Artificial Intelligence
. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Palmer, Frank Robert (1987):
The English Verb
. London: Longman, 2nd edition.
Perlmutter, David M. (1970): “The two verbs begin
.” In: Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.)
Readings in English Transformational Grammar
, Waltham MA, etc.: Ginn and Company. 107–119.
Pinkster, Harm (1983): “Tempus, aspect and aktionsart in latin (recent trends 1961–1981).” In:
2. Principat. Bd. 29. Sprache und Literatur. 1. Teilband
, Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 270–319.
Postal, Paul M. (1974):
On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications
. Cambridge MA and London: MIT Press.
Pustejovsky, James (1991): “The syntax of event structure.”
Cognition
41: 47–81.
Pustejovsky, James (1995):
The Generative Lexicon
. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Pustejovsky, James & Boullion, Pierette (1995): “Aspectual coercion and logical polysemy.”
Journal of Semantics
12: 133–162.
Ramchand, Gillian (2008):
Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: a First-phase Syntax
. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ross, John R. (1972): “More on begin
.”
Foundations of Language
8: 574–577.
Tichý, Pavel (1985): “Do we need interval semantics?”
Linguistics and Philosophy
8: 263–282.
Vendler, Zeno (1957): “Verbs and times.”
Philosophical Review
66: 143–160.
Verkuyl, Henk J. (1972):
On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects
. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Verkuyl, Henk J. (1988): “Aspectual asymmetry and quantification.” In: Veronika Ehrich & Heinz Vater (eds.)
Temporalsemantik: Beiträge zur Linguistik der Zeitreferenz,
Tübingen: Niemeyer. 220–259.
Verkuyl, Henk J. (1993):
A Theory of Aspectuality: The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure
. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, Edwin (1994):
Thematic Structure in Syntax
. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
von Wright, Georg Henrik (1963):
Norm and Action: A Logical Enquiry
. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
von Wright, Georg Henrik (1968):
An Essay in Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action
. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Zifonun, Gisela, Hoffmann, Ludger & Strecker, Bruno (1997):
Grammatik der deutschen Sprache
. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Inglese, Guglielmo & Silvia Luraghi
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.