Cover not available
Part of
The Evidential Basis of Linguistic Argumentation
Edited by András Kertész and Csilla Rákosi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 153] 2014
► pp. 15–48

Chapter 2. The p-model of data and evidence in linguistics

The p-model is a metatheoretical approach to linguistic theorising that has been designed to capture the nature of linguistic data and evidence in an unorthodox and novel, but well-motivated and effective way. Its starting point is the insight that the latest literature on linguistic data and evidence acknowledged the uncertainty of the latter as their key feature. Since the main characteristic of plausible inferences is that they facilitate drawing conclusions from uncertain premises, and since chains of plausible inferences constitute the main body of the process of plausible argumentation, the basic idea of the p-model is that the structure of linguistic theories is based on various techniques of plausible argumentation. This chapter summarises the main hypotheses of the p-model, which the case studies in the volume are expected to apply to various linguistic theories.
Published online: 23 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.153.02ker
References (39)
References
Anand, Pranav & Nevins, Andrew. 2004. Shifty operators in changing contexts. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory , Kazuha Watanabe & Robert B. Young.(eds), 20–37. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Baltin, Mark R. 1987. Degree Complements. In Discontinuous Constituency [Syntax and semantics 20], Geoffrey J. Huck & Almerindo E. Ojeda, (eds), 11–26. Orlando FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bibok, Károly. This volume. The plausibility of approaches to syntactic alternation of Hungarian verbs.
Colon, Germà. 1978a [1959]. El perfet perifràstic català “va + infinitiu”. (The Catalan periphrastic perfect “va + infinitive”). In La llengua catalana en els seus textos (The Catalan language of texts),Vol.2, Germà Colon (ed), 119–130. Barcelona: Curial.Google Scholar
. 1978b[1976]. Sobre el perfet perifràstic ‘vado + infinitiu’, en català, en provençal i en francès (On the periphrastic perfect ‘vado + infinitive’ in Catalan, Provençal and, French). In La llengua catalana en els seus textos (The Catalan language of texts), Vol. 2, Germà Colon (ed.), 131–174. Barcelona: Curial.Google Scholar
Detges, Ulrich. 2004. How cognitive is grammaticalization? The history of the Catalan perfet perifràstic . In Up and Down the Cline – The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds), 211–227. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gougenheim, Georges. 1971 [1929]. Étude sur les périphrases verbales de la langue française . Paris: Nizet.Google Scholar
Juge, Matthew L. 2006. Morphological factors in the grammaticalization of the Catalan “go” past. Diachronica 23(2): 313–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kager, René. 1999. Optimality Theory . Cambrige: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. In Themes from Kaplan, Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds), 481–563. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kepser, Stephan & Reis, Marga. 2005. Evidence in linguistics. In Kepser & Reis (eds), 1–6.DOI logo
(eds). 2005. Linguistic Evidence. Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives . Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kertész, András. 1993. Heuristik der deutschen Phonologie. Eine elementare Einführung in Strategien der Problemlösung . Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
. 2004a. Philosophie der Linguistik. Studien zur naturalisierten Wissenschaftstheorie . Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
. 2004b. Cognitive Semantics and Scientific Knowledge. Case studies in the Cognitive Science of Science [Converging Evidence in Languag and Communication Research 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla. 2006. Inconsistency and plausible reasoning in an analysis of German affricates. A case study in the philosophy of linguistics. Language Sciences 28: 386–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Cyclic vs. circular argumentation in the conceptual metaphor theory. Cognitive Linguistics 20(4): 703–732. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Data and Evidence in Linguistics. A Plausible Argumentation Model . Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Paraconsistency and plausible argumentation in generative grammar: A case study. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22(2): 195–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keszler, Borbála (ed.). 2000. Magyar grammatika (Hungarian grammar). Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Komlósy, András. 1994. Complements and adjuncts. In Syntax and Semantics 27, Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds), 91–178. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nagy C., Katalin. This volume. Methods and argumentation in historical linguistics: A case study.
Németh T., Enikő. This volume. Hungarian verbs of natural phenomena with explicit and implicit subject arguments: their use and occurrence in the light of data.
Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Polya, George. 1948. How to Solve It . Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
. 1954. Patterns of Plausible Inference . London: OUP.Google Scholar
Rákosi, Csilla. This volume. Data and the resolution of inconsistency in Optimality Theory.
Rescher, Nicholas. 1973. The Coherence Theory of Truth . Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1976. Plausible Reasoning . Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
. 1977. Methodological Pragmatism . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1979. Cognitive Systematization . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1987. How serious a fallacy is inconsistency? Argumentation 1: 303–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas & Brandom, Robert. 1980. The Logic of Inconsistency . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sárik, Pál. 1998. A határozói igenevek néhány problémája (Some problems of adverbial participles). Magyar Nyelv 94: 423–435.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2003. A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 29–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stechow, Arnim. 2003. Feature deletion under semantic binding: Tense, person, and mood under verbal quantifiers. In NELS 33: Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, GLSA, Makoto Kadowaki & Shigeto Kawahara (eds), 379–404. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Tóth, Ildikó. 2001. Impersonal constructions and null expletives. In Argument structure in Hungarian, Istvan Kenesei (ed.), 51–78. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Vecsey, Zoltán. This volume. A plausibility-based model of shifted in dexicals.
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Francis, Elaine J.
2021. Gradient Acceptability and Linguistic Theory, DOI logo
Furkó, Péter B.
2020. Discourse Markers in Natural Conversations, Scripted Conversations and Political Interviews: Core and Peripheral Uses. In Discourse Markers and Beyond, ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Furkó, Péter, András Kertész & Ágnes Abuczki
2019. Discourse Markers in Different Types of Reporting. In Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 19], ► pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Rákosi, Csilla
2017. Replication of Psycholinguistic Experiments and the Resolution of Inconsistencies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46:5 ► pp. 1249 ff. DOI logo
Kertész, András
2016. Poor vs. Good Thought Experiments in Pragmatics: A Case Study. In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 9], ► pp. 643 ff. DOI logo
Kertész, András
2019. Fallacies in the Historiography of Generative Linguistics. Foundations of Science 24:4 ► pp. 775 ff. DOI logo
Kertész, András & Csilla Rákosi
2016. On the Inferential Structure of Indirect Reports. In Indirect Reports and Pragmatics [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 5], ► pp. 435 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.