Article published in:
The Evidential Basis of Linguistic Argumentation
Edited by András Kertész and Csilla Rákosi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 153] 2014
► pp. 221270
References

References

Austin, John L.
1962 How to do Things with Words . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Brown, James Robert & Fehige, Yiftach
2011Thought experiments. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . http://​plato​.stanford​.edu​/entries​/ thought​-experiment​/> (23 September 2013).
Cohen, Philip R. & Levesque, Hector J.
1990Rational interaction as the basis for communication. In Intentions in communication , Philip R. Cohen, Jerry L. Morgan & Martha E. Pollack (eds), 221–256. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry M.
1985 Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice . Beverly Hills CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W.
1983Do people always process the literal meaning of indirect requests? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 9: 524–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gooding, David
1993What is experimental about thought experiment? In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , 1992, Vol. 2: Symposia and Invited Papers , 280–290. East Lansing MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul
1989a [1957]Meaning. In Grice 1989c, 213–223.
1989bUtterer’s meaning and intentions. In Grice 1989c, 86–116.
1989c Studies in the Way of Words . Cambridge MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holtgraves, Thomas & Ashley, Aaron
2001Comprehending illocutionary force. Memory & Cognition 29: 83–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kertész, András
2010On stage setting thought experiments in cognitive linguistics: A case study. In Von Katastrophen, Zeichen und vom Ursprung der menschlichen Sprache , Cornelia Stroh (ed.), 7–30. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Kertész, András & Kiefer, Ferenc
2013From thought experiments to real experiments in pragmatics. In Perspectives on Philosophy and Pragmatics , Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds). Berlin: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla
2012 Data and Evidence in Linguistics. A Plausible Argumentation Model . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
This volume a. Introduction: The state of the art and the structure of the book.
This volume b. The p-model of data and evidence in linguistics.
Keysar, Boaz, Shen, Yeshayahu, Glucksberg, Sam & Horton, William S.
2000Conventional language: How metaphorical is it? Journal of Memory and Language 43: 576–593. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kühne, Ulrich
2005 Die Methode des Gedankenexperiments . Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Meggle, Georg & Ulkan, Maria
1979Kennst du das Land, wo die Zitronen blühn? (Zu Searles Kritik an Grice). Papiere zur Linguistik 20: 75–87.Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg
2012Pragmatic evidence, context, and story design. An essay on recent developments in experimental pragmatics. Language Sciences 34(6): 768–776. (= Kertész, András, Schwarz-Friesel, Monika & Consten, Manfred (eds), Converging Data Types in Cognitive Linguistics . Amsterdam: Elsevier).Google Scholar
Moue, Aspasia S., Masavetas, Kyriakos A. & Karayianni, Haido
2006Tracing the developments of thought experiments in the philosophy of natural sciences. Journal for the General Philosophy of Science 37: 61–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nersessian, Nancy J.
1993In the theoretician’s laboratory: Thought experimenting as mental modelling. In Proceedings of the 1992 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Vol. 2, 291–301. East Landing MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
1991The cognitive sciences and the history of science. In Proceedings, joint HSS-SHOT conference on Critical Problems and Research Frontiers in History of Science and Technology , October 1991, 92–116. Madison WI.Google Scholar
Norton, John D.
1991Thought experiments in Einstein’s work. In Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy , Tamara Horowitz & Gerard J. Massey (eds), 129–48. Savage MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
2002On thought experiments: Is there more to the argument? http://​philsci​-archive​.pitt​.edu​/960​/1​/Norton​.doc>/
Noveck, Ira A. & Sperber, Dan
2007The why and how of experimental pragmatics. In Pragmatics , Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), 184–212. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Noveck, Ira A. & Reboul, Anne
2008Experimental Pragmatics: a Gricean turn in the study of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(11): 425–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rákosi, Csilla
2011aMetatheoretical reconstruction of psycholinguistic experiments. Part 1. Sprachtheorie und germanistische Linguistik 21(1): 55–93. (Csatár, Péter (ed.), Metapher, Metonymie und Argumentation/Metaphor, Metonymy and Argumentation 1. Münster: Nodus).Google Scholar
2011bMetatheoretical reconstruction of psycholinguistic experiments. Part 2. Sprachtheorie und germanistische Linguistik , 21.2 [= Csatár, Péter (ed), Metapher, Metonymie und Argumentation/Metaphor, Metonymy and Argumentation 2. Münster: Nodus], 159–187.Google Scholar
2012The fabulous engine: Strengths and flaws of psycholinguistic experiments. Language Sciences 34(6): 682–702. (= Kertész, András, Schwarz-Friesel, Monika & Consten, Manfred (eds), Converging Data Types in Cognitive Linguistics . Amsterdam: Elsevier).Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1991Conversational analysis and socially shared cognition. In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition , Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine & Stephanie D. Teasley (eds), 150–171. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969 Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. & Vanderveken, Daniel
1985 Foundations of Illocutionary Logic . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Reed, Chris & Macagno, Fabrizio
2008 Argumentation Schemes . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1958[1953] Philosophical Investigations . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Kertész, András
2015. The Puzzle of Thought Experiments in Conceptual Metaphor Research. Foundations of Science 20:2  pp. 147 ff. Crossref logo
Kertész, András
2016.  In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 9],  pp. 643 ff. Crossref logo
Kertész, András & Csilla Rákosi
2014.  In The Evidential Basis of Linguistic Argumentation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 153],  pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo
Kertész, András & Csilla Rákosi
2016.  In Indirect Reports and Pragmatics [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 5],  pp. 435 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.