Cover not available
Part of
The Sociolinguistics of Grammar
Edited by Tor A. Åfarli and Brit Mæhlum
[Studies in Language Companion Series 154] 2014
► pp. 153–170

Syntactic frames and single-word code-switching

A case study of Mandarin Chinese - Norwegian bilingualism

Mainstream core grammar theory, still to some extent relying on the idealized speaker in a homogeneous speech community, is ill equipped to handle different kinds of periphery data, like code-switching data and other types of language mixing data. In this paper, we defend a model of grammar that we argue is able to handle different types of both core and periphery data. Empirically, we focus on single-word code-switching data obtained from a small corpus of the Chinese production of a bilingual Mandarin Chinese – Norwegian child. We develop the beginnings of a generative frame model of grammar exploiting insights both from late insertion neo-constructional models and from code-switching theories assuming a matrix – embedded language asymmetry. We will be paying special attention to the lexicon – syntax interface.
Published online: 16 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.154.08afa
References (38)
References
Åfarli, Tor A. 2007. Do verbs have argument structure? In Argument Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 108], Eric Reuland, Tanmoy Bhattacharya & Giorgos Spathas (eds), 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Hybrid verb forms in American Norwegian and the analysis of the syntactic relation between the verb and its tense. Ms, NTNU, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Åfarli, Tor A. & Eide, Kristin M. 2000. Subject requirement and predication. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 23: 27–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Åfarli, Tor A. & Jin, Fufen. 2011. The Matrix Language Frame Model in a principles and parameters adaption: A case study of Mandarin – Norwegian code-switching. Talk at ISB8, University of Oslo, June 15–18.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring Sense, Vols. I & II. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591–656.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures . Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1991. Linguistics and cognitive science: Problems and mysteries. In The Chomskyan Turn, Asa Kasher (ed.), 26–53. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2002. On Nature and Language . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve & Clark, Herbert. 1979. When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55: 767–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective . Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter & Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler Syntax . Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, Lila. 1990. The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition 1: 3–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure . Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–179. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley Hidi & Noyer, Rolf. 1999. Distributed morphology. Glot International 4: 3–9.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1953. The Norwegian Language in America: A Study in Bilingual Behavior, Vol. I & II. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hjelde, Arnstein. 1992. Trøndsk talemål i Amerika . Trondheim: Tapir forlag.Google Scholar
van Hout, Angeliek. 1996. Event Semantics and Verb Frame Alternations [TILDIL Dissertation Series]. PhD dissertation, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, Li, Y.-H. Audrey & Li, Yafei. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jin, Fufen. 2010. Linguistic competence in the minority language. Paper presented at GSFL, NTNU, Trondheim, September 22–26.
Jin, Fufen & Eide, Kristin M. 2011. Contradictory parameter settings in one mind: A case study of a bilingual’s acquisition of finiteness and V2 in Norwegian. Talk at ISB8, University of Oslo, June 15–18.Google Scholar
Kamwangamalu, Nkonko M. 1997. Language contact, code-switching, and I-languages: Evidence from Africa. South African Journal of Linguistics 15: 45–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1997. Elementary Operations and Optimal Derivations . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lohndal, Terje. 2012. Without Specifiers: Phrase Structure and Events. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2), Alexis Dimitriadis, Laura Siegel, Clarissa Surek-Clark & Alexander Williams (eds), 201–225. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania, Penn Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
. 2013. Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua 130: 152–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1993. Duelling Languages: Grammatical Structure in Codeswitching . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2002. Contact Linguistics: Bilingual Encounters and Grammatical Outcomes . Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nygård. Mari. 2013. Situational Ellipses in Spontaneous Spoken Norwegian: Clausal Architecture and Licensing Conditions. PhD dissertation, NTNU, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 2012. Towards a minimal argument structure. Ms, University of Lund.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana. 2004. Code-switching. In Soziolinguistik. An International Handbook of the Science of Language, 2nd edn, Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier & Peter Trudgill (eds). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing Arguments . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian C. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. A First-Phase Syntax . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. A Handbook in Generative Syntax , Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Türker, Emel. 2000. Turkish – Norwegian codeswitching: Evidence from Intermediate and Second Generation Turkish Immigrants in Norway. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Xu, Ding, 1997. Functional Categories in Mandarin Chinese . The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Åfarli, Tor A. & Karumuri V. Subbarao
2019. Models of grammar and the outcomes of long-term language contact. In Diverse Scenarios of Syntactic Complexity [Typological Studies in Language, 126], ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.