Cover not available
Part of
Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar: Towards the understanding of human language
Edited by Kaori Kabata and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Studies in Language Companion Series 156] 2014
► pp. 13–36

Subordination and information status

A case of To and Koto complement clauses 
in Japanese

This paper examines one type of subordinate construction in Japanese, namely, complement clauses, in particular those where two different complementizers, to and koto, are interchangeable.  Despite the general notion that main clauses code foreground information (or express a main assertion) while subordinate clauses code background information (or less profiled information), our examination shows that some subordinate clauses do code more important foreground information.  Subordinate clauses are not by any means a unitary category; they display differing degrees of subordination.  My goals, therefore, are to delineate differences between the two complementizer uses, and to show that clauses with to and koto present differing degrees of subordination, and that there is a correlation between degree of subordination and information status.

Published online: 10 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.156.05mcg
References
Akatsuka, Noriko
1985 Conditionals and the epistemic scale. Language 61(3): 625-639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bever, Thomas G
1969 The comprehension and memory of sentences with temporal relations. Advances in Psycholinguistics , Giovanni B. Flores d’Arcais & Willem J.M. Levelt (eds), 285-293. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
1970 The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. Cognition and the Development of Language , John R. Hayes (ed.), 279-263. New York NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2002 Main clauses are innovative, subordinate clauses are conservative: Consequences for the nature of constructions. In Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse: Essays in Honor of Sandra A. Thompson , Joan Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds), 1-17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
1985 Direct and indirect speech: General problems and problems of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 41-63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Alice
1979 Some mysteries of subordination. Studies in the Linguistic Science 9(1): 105-128.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John
1987 The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805-55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
2003  Searching for Structure: The Problem of Complementation in Colloquial Indonesian Conversation [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara & Thompson, Sandra A
1990 A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses. Language 66: 297-316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzynger, Zygmunt
1991 The de dicto domain in language. In Approaches to Grammaticalization , Vol. 1 [Typoloical Studies in Language 19(1)], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 219-251. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T
1979  On Understanding Grammar . New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1989  Mind, Code and Context: Essays in Pragmatics . Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John & Woisetschlaeger, Erich
1982 The logic of the English progressive. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 79-90.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1985  Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John & Thompson, Sandra A
1984 Subordination in Universal Grammar. BLS 10: 510-523.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto
1997 An exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle in Japanese spoken discourse. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 6 , Ho-Min Sohn & John Haig (eds), 565-581. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B
1975 On assertive predicates. In Syntax and Semantics 4 , John Kimball (ed.), 91-124. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1979 Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. Syntax and Semantics 12 , T. Givón (ed.), 213-241. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko, Ikuta, Shôko, Kawasaki, Akiko, Hori, Motoko & Haga, Hitomi
1984  Syuhu no Issyuukan no Danwa Siryoo . Tokyo: Shuuei-shuppan.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi
1993  Subjectivity in Grammar and Discourse.  Theoretical Considerations and a Case Study of Japanese Spoken Discourse [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Ono, Tsuyohi
2002 ‘Sentence’ in spontaneous spoken Japanese discourse. In Complex Sentence in Grammar and Discourse: Essays in Honor of Sandra A. Thompson , Joan L. Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds), 175-202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kamada, Osamu
1994 Nihongo no dentatsu hyoogen (Reportive expressions in Japanese). Nihongogaku 7: 59-72.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri
1971. Some observations on factivity. Papers in Linguistics 4: 55-69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1973  The Structure of the Japanese Language . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1976 Subject raising. In Syntax and Semantics, 5: Japanese Generative Grammar , Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 17-49. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994  Information Structure and Sentence Form . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1991  Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol II: Descriptive Applications . Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert E
1976 The discourse structure of the flood narrative. In Society of Biblical Literature: 1976 Seminar Papers , George W. MacRae (ed.), 235-262. Missoula MO: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Masuoka, Takashi & Takubo, Yukinori
1992  Kiso Nihongo Bunpoo . Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Kenjirô
1998 On the conservatism of embedded clauses. Theoretical and Applied linguistics at Kobe Shoin 1: 1-13.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. & Thompson, Sandra A
1988 The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 275-329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko
1986 The particle –o and content-oriented indirect speech in Japanese written discourse. In Direct and Indirect Speech , Florian Coulmas (ed.), 179-200. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990  An Introduction to Japanese Grammar and Communication Strategies . Tokyo: The Japan Times.Google Scholar
1996 Multivoicedness in speech and thought representation: The case of self-quotation in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 207-226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, Noriko Akatsuka
1978 Another look at no, koto and to: Epistemology and complementizer choice in Japanese. In Problems in Japanese Syntax and Semantics , John Hinds & Irwin Howard, 178-212. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
McGloin, Naomi H
1977 The Speaker’s Attitude and the Conditionals to, tara and ba . Papers in Japanese Linguistics 5:181-191.Google Scholar
1989  A Students’ Guide to Japanese Grammar . Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
1999 Pragmatic and discourse functions of the rhetorical negative question form, Zyanai desu ka . In Search of the Human Mind , Masatake Muraki & Enoch Iwamoto (eds), 452-469. Tokyo: KaitakushaGoogle Scholar
2005 Hobun hyooshiki toshite no TO no imi-saikoo (The complementizer TO revisited). In Gengo Kyooiku no Shin-tenkai , Osamu Kamada et al. (eds), 49-60. Tokyo: Hitsuji-shobo.Google Scholar
Minami, Fujio
1974  Gendai-Nihongo no Koozoo (Structure of Modern Japanese). Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Modini, Paul
1982 Subordinate clauses and discourse. Papers in Linguistics 15(1-4): 255-261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moriyama, Takuro
2000  Koko kara hajimaru Nihongo bunpoo . Tokyo: Hitsuji-shobo.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick
2003 Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language 79(4): 682-707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohori, Toshio
1997 Framing effects in Japanese non-final clauses: Toward an optimal grammar pragmatics interface. BLS 23: 471-480.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko
1995 Pragmaticization of meaning in some sentence-final particles in Japanese. In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics. In Honor of Charles J. Fillmore [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32], Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 219-246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko & Ono, Tsuyoshi
2008 Quotative –tte in Japanese: Its multifaceted functions and degrees of ‘subordination’. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language Series 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 205-230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Thompson, Sandra A
1996 Interaction and syntax in the structure of conversational discourse: Collaboration, overlap, and syntactic dissociation. In Computational and Conversational Discourse Burning Issues—An Interdisciplinary Account , Eduard Hovy & David W. Scott (eds), 67-96. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prideaux, Gary D
1993 Subordination and information distribution in oral and written narratives. Pragmatics & Cognition 1(1): 51-69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary
1992 Subordination and linguistic complexity. Discourse Processes 15(2): 117-131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sunakawa, Yuriko
1988 In’yoobun ni okeru ba no nijuusei ni tsuite (On the duality of ‘place’ in quotation). Nihongogaku 7: 14-29.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Ryoko
1999  Grammaticalization in Japanese: A Study of Pragmatic Particle-Ization . PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Satoko
1997 The relevance of factivity to complementizer choice in Japanese. Studies in Language 21(2): 287-311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001  De dicto complementation in Japanese. In Complementation: Cognitive and Functional Perspectives [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 1], Kaoru Horie (ed.), 33-57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A
2002 ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26(1): 125-163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Hopper, Paul
2001 Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Lanuage 45], Joan L. Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds), 27-60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony J
1991 The discourse conditions for the use of complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 237-251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Russell
1985 Foreground-background information and the syntax of subordination. Text 5(1-2): 85-122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Matsumoto, Yoshiko
2018. Chapter 3. The form and meaning of the dangling mitaina construction in a network of constructions. In Pragmatics of Japanese [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 285], ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Dedication. In Pragmatics of Japanese [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 285], ► pp. vii ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.