Cover not available
Part of
Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar: Towards the understanding of human language
Edited by Kaori Kabata and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Studies in Language Companion Series 156] 2014
► pp. 13–36

Subordination and information status

A case of To and Koto complement clauses 
in Japanese

This paper examines one type of subordinate construction in Japanese, namely, complement clauses, in particular those where two different complementizers, to and koto, are interchangeable.  Despite the general notion that main clauses code foreground information (or express a main assertion) while subordinate clauses code background information (or less profiled information), our examination shows that some subordinate clauses do code more important foreground information.  Subordinate clauses are not by any means a unitary category; they display differing degrees of subordination.  My goals, therefore, are to delineate differences between the two complementizer uses, and to show that clauses with to and koto present differing degrees of subordination, and that there is a correlation between degree of subordination and information status.
Published online: 10 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.156.05mcg
References (57)
References
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1985. Conditionals and the epistemic scale. Language 61(3): 625-639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bever, Thomas G. 1969. The comprehension and memory of sentences with temporal relations. Advances in Psycholinguistics , Giovanni B. Flores d’Arcais & Willem J.M. Levelt (eds), 285-293. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. Cognition and the Development of Language , John R. Hayes (ed.), 279-263. New York NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2002. Main clauses are innovative, subordinate clauses are conservative: Consequences for the nature of constructions. In Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse: Essays in Honor of Sandra A. Thompson , Joan Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds), 1-17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1985. Direct and indirect speech: General problems and problems of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 41-63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Alice. 1979. Some mysteries of subordination. Studies in the Linguistic Science 9(1): 105-128.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805-55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, Robert. 2003. Searching for Structure: The Problem of Complementation in Colloquial Indonesian Conversation [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara & Thompson, Sandra A. 1990. A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses. Language 66: 297-316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzynger, Zygmunt. 1991. The de dicto domain in language. In Approaches to Grammaticalization , Vol. 1 [Typoloical Studies in Language 19(1)], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 219-251. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. 1979. On Understanding Grammar . New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1989. Mind, Code and Context: Essays in Pragmatics . Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John & Woisetschlaeger, Erich. 1982. The logic of the English progressive. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 79-90.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1985. Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John & Thompson, Sandra A. 1984. Subordination in Universal Grammar. BLS 10: 510-523.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 1997. An exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle in Japanese spoken discourse. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 6 , Ho-Min Sohn & John Haig (eds), 565-581. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. 1975. On assertive predicates. In Syntax and Semantics 4 , John Kimball (ed.), 91-124. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. Syntax and Semantics 12 , T. Givón (ed.), 213-241. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko, Ikuta, Shôko, Kawasaki, Akiko, Hori, Motoko & Haga, Hitomi. 1984. Syuhu no Issyuukan no Danwa Siryoo . Tokyo: Shuuei-shuppan.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1993. Subjectivity in Grammar and Discourse.  Theoretical Considerations and a Case Study of Japanese Spoken Discourse [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Ono, Tsuyohi. 2002. ‘Sentence’ in spontaneous spoken Japanese discourse. In Complex Sentence in Grammar and Discourse: Essays in Honor of Sandra A. Thompson , Joan L. Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds), 175-202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kamada, Osamu. 1994. Nihongo no dentatsu hyoogen (Reportive expressions in Japanese). Nihongogaku 7: 59-72.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. Some observations on factivity. Papers in Linguistics 4: 55-69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1976. Subject raising. In Syntax and Semantics, 5: Japanese Generative Grammar , Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 17-49. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol II: Descriptive Applications . Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert E. 1976. The discourse structure of the flood narrative. In Society of Biblical Literature: 1976 Seminar Papers , George W. MacRae (ed.), 235-262. Missoula MO: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Masuoka, Takashi & Takubo, Yukinori. 1992. Kiso Nihongo Bunpoo . Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Kenjirô. 1998. On the conservatism of embedded clauses. Theoretical and Applied linguistics at Kobe Shoin 1: 1-13.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1988. The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 275-329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko. 1986. The particle –o and content-oriented indirect speech in Japanese written discourse. In Direct and Indirect Speech , Florian Coulmas (ed.), 179-200. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. An Introduction to Japanese Grammar and Communication Strategies . Tokyo: The Japan Times.Google Scholar
. 1996. Multivoicedness in speech and thought representation: The case of self-quotation in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 207-226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, Noriko Akatsuka. 1978. Another look at no, koto and to: Epistemology and complementizer choice in Japanese. In Problems in Japanese Syntax and Semantics , John Hinds & Irwin Howard, 178-212. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
McGloin, Naomi H. 1977. The Speaker’s Attitude and the Conditionals to, tara and ba . Papers in Japanese Linguistics 5:181-191.Google Scholar
. 1989. A Students’ Guide to Japanese Grammar . Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
. 1999. Pragmatic and discourse functions of the rhetorical negative question form, Zyanai desu ka . In Search of the Human Mind , Masatake Muraki & Enoch Iwamoto (eds), 452-469. Tokyo: KaitakushaGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Hobun hyooshiki toshite no TO no imi-saikoo (The complementizer TO revisited). In Gengo Kyooiku no Shin-tenkai , Osamu Kamada et al. (eds), 49-60. Tokyo: Hitsuji-shobo.Google Scholar
Minami, Fujio. 1974. Gendai-Nihongo no Koozoo (Structure of Modern Japanese). Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Modini, Paul. 1982. Subordinate clauses and discourse. Papers in Linguistics 15(1-4): 255-261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moriyama, Takuro. 2000. Koko kara hajimaru Nihongo bunpoo . Tokyo: Hitsuji-shobo.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick. 2003. Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language 79(4): 682-707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohori, Toshio. 1997. Framing effects in Japanese non-final clauses: Toward an optimal grammar pragmatics interface. BLS 23: 471-480.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko. 1995. Pragmaticization of meaning in some sentence-final particles in Japanese. In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics. In Honor of Charles J. Fillmore [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32], Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 219-246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko & Ono, Tsuyoshi. 2008. Quotative –tte in Japanese: Its multifaceted functions and degrees of ‘subordination’. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language Series 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 205-230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Thompson, Sandra A. 1996. Interaction and syntax in the structure of conversational discourse: Collaboration, overlap, and syntactic dissociation. In Computational and Conversational Discourse Burning Issues—An Interdisciplinary Account , Eduard Hovy & David W. Scott (eds), 67-96. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prideaux, Gary D. 1993. Subordination and information distribution in oral and written narratives. Pragmatics & Cognition 1(1): 51-69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary. 1992. Subordination and linguistic complexity. Discourse Processes 15(2): 117-131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sunakawa, Yuriko. 1988. In’yoobun ni okeru ba no nijuusei ni tsuite (On the duality of ‘place’ in quotation). Nihongogaku 7: 14-29.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Ryoko. 1999. Grammaticalization in Japanese: A Study of Pragmatic Particle-Ization . PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Satoko. 1997. The relevance of factivity to complementizer choice in Japanese. Studies in Language 21(2): 287-311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. De dicto complementation in Japanese. In Complementation: Cognitive and Functional Perspectives [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 1], Kaoru Horie (ed.), 33-57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26(1): 125-163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Hopper, Paul. 2001. Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Lanuage 45], Joan L. Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds), 27-60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony J. 1991. The discourse conditions for the use of complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 237-251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Russell. 1985. Foreground-background information and the syntax of subordination. Text 5(1-2): 85-122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Matsumoto, Yoshiko
2018. Chapter 3. The form and meaning of the dangling mitaina construction in a network of constructions. In Pragmatics of Japanese [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 285], ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Dedication. In Pragmatics of Japanese [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 285], ► pp. vii ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.