Cover not available
Part of
Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar: Towards the understanding of human language
Edited by Kaori Kabata and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Studies in Language Companion Series 156] 2014
► pp. 37–54

On state of mind and grammatical forms 
from functional perspectives

The case for Garu and Te-iru

The basic usages of the auxiliary verbs ~garu and ~(te)iru are generally understood as expressing desire and thoughts other than those of the speaker him/herself. A proposition accompanying~garu and ~(te)iru is often used with a modal, such as mitai, rashii, etc.; therefore, it belongs to the territory of the speaker domain. However, the proposition concerns another individual’s feelings that the speaker cannot perceive directly and is not an exclusive possession of the speaker. Using real-life usages that incorporate the notion of “territory of information” proposed by Kamio (1990) and the notion of “empathy,” by Kuno (1998), it is found that issues of hierarchy and empathy are deeply intertwined in their use in authentic communication and do not necessarily follow the description of standard grammar.
Published online: 10 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.156.06joh
References (15)
References
Chomsky, Noam. 1956. Theories of Syntax . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Johnson, Yuki. 2004. Modality and the Japanese Language . Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Center for Japanese Studies Publication Program.Google Scholar
. 2008. Fundamentals of Japanese Grammar . Hawaii HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Jorden, Elinor Harz & Noda, Mari. 1987. Japanese: The Spoken Language , Part I. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1990. Joohoo no Nawabari Riron . Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
. 1994. The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 21: 67-100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997a. Evidentiality and some discourse characteristics in Japanese. In Directions in Functional Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 36], Akio Kamio (ed.), 145-171. Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997b. Theory of Territory of Information [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 48]. Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1999. Functional Syntax . Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Makino, Seichi, Hatasa, Yukiko Abe & Hatasa, Kazumi. 1998. Nakama I . New York NY: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Makino, Seichi & Tsutsui, Michio. 1989. A Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar . Tokyo: Japan Times.Google Scholar
Morita, Yoshiyuki. 1980. Kiso Nihongo 2 . Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Nagai, Y., et al. 1999. Genki I . Tokyo: Japan Times.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick. 2003. Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language 79: 682-707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tohsaku, Yasu-Hiko. 1999. Yookoso , 2nd edn. New York NY: McGraw-Hill College.Google Scholar