Cover not available
Part of
Noun Valency
Edited by Olga Spevak
[Studies in Language Companion Series 158] 2014
► pp. 1–18

Chapter 1. Contribution of valency to the analysis of language

| Charles University, Prague Faculty of Mathematics and Physics

The main criteria used for the valency of verbs in the framework of Functional Generative Description (FGD) are introduced, leading to the recognition of three classes of verbal modifications : inner participants (IPs), obligatory free modifications (FMs), and quasivalency modifiers (QMs). The sources of surface deletions of valency modifications are presented. For an analysis of noun valency, word formation is taken into consideration. The criteria proposed for the valency of verbs are applied in order to determine the valency of deverbal nouns. Conversion of the verbal valency frame into the valency frame of the noun is accompanied by formal changes in the morphemic form of inner participants. The behavior of specific noun modifiers is studied with regard to their position in the corresponding valency frame (VF).

Published online: 19 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.158.01pan
References
Daneš, František, Grepl, Miroslav & Hlavsa, Zdeněk
(eds) 1987 Mluvnice češtiny 3: Skladba (Czech grammar 3: Syntax). Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
Grepl, Miroslav & Karlík, Petr
1986 Skladba spisovné češtiny (Syntax of literary Czech). Prague: SPN.Google Scholar
Helbig, Gerhard & Schenkel, Wolfgang
1969 Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Distribution deutcher Verben. Leipzig: VEB Bibliographische Institut.Google Scholar
Karlík, Petr & Nübler, Norbert
1998 Poznámky k nominalizaci v češtině (Notes on nominalisation in Czech). Slovo a slovesnost 59: 105–112.Google Scholar
Kolářová, Veronika
2010 Valence deverbativních substantiv v češtině (na materiálu substantiv s dativní valencí) (Valency of deverbal nouns in Czech: On the basis of nouns with dative valency). Prague: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1936 Dérivation lexicale et dérivation syntaxique. Bulletin de la Société linguistique de Paris 37: 79–92.Google Scholar
Lopatková, Markéta & Panevová, Jarmila
2006 Recent development of the theory of valency in the light of Prague Dependency Treebank. In Insight into Slovak and Czech Corpus Linguistics, Mária Šimková (ed.), 83–92. Bratislava: Veda.Google Scholar
Lopatková, Markéta, Žabokrtský, Zdeněk & Kettnerová, Václava
2008 Valenční slovník českých sloves (Valency lexicon of Czech verbs). Prague: Karolinum. [URL]Google Scholar
Mel’chuk, Igor A
1988 Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany NY: New York State University Press.Google Scholar
Mikulová, Marie et al.
2005 Anotace na tektogramatické rovině Pražského závislostního korpusu. Anotátorská příručka (Annotation on the Tectogrammatical Level in the Prague Dependency Treebank. Annotation manual). Technical Report TR-2005-28. Prague: ÚFAL MFF UK.Google Scholar
Panevová, Jarmila
1974 On verbal frames in Functional Generative Description, Part I. The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 22: 3–40.Google Scholar
1975 On verbal frames in Functional Generative Description, Part II. The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 23: 17–52.Google Scholar
2000 Poznámky k valenci podstatných jmen (Remarks on valency of nouns). In Čeština – univerzália a specifika 2, Zdeňka Hladká & Petr Karlík (eds), 173-180. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.Google Scholar
2003 Some issues of syntax and semantics of verbal modifications. In Proceedings MTT 2003, First International Conference on Meaning-Text Theory, 139–146. Paris: École Normale Supérieure.Google Scholar
2008 Povaha stupňování adjektiv: K “nesrovnávacímu” užití stupňovaných forem (Degrees of comparison of adjectives: On their non-comparative meaning). In Iugi Observatione... Jubilejný zborník na počesť L’ubomíra Ďuroviča, Slavomír Ondrejovič (ed.), 149–156. Bratislava: Veda.Google Scholar
Panevová, Jarmila & Mikulová, Marie
2012 Assimetrii mezhdu hlubinnym i poverxnostnym predstavleniem predlozhenija (na primere dvux tipov obstojatel’stv v cheshskom jazyke) (Asymmetries between deep and surface representation of sentence: Case of two types of adverbials in Czech). In Smysly, teksty i drugie zachvatyvajushchie sjuzhety. Sbornik statej v chest’ 80-letija I. A. Mel’chuka, Jurij D. Apresjan, Igor’ M. Boguslavskij et al. (eds), 486–499. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Piťha, Petr
1981 On the case frames of nouns. In Prague Studies in Mathematical Linguistics, Vol. 7, 215–224. Prague: Academia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sgall, Petr
1967 Generativní popis jazyka a česká deklinace (A generative description of language and the Czech declension). Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
Sgall, Petr, Hajičová, Eva & Panevová, Jarmila
1986 The Meaning of the Sentence in Its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects. Dordrecht & Prague: Reidel & Academia.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien
1959 Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Urešová, Zdeňka
2011 Valence sloves v Pražském závislostním korpusu (Verb valency in Prague Dependency Treebank) [Studies in Computational and Theoretical Linguistics]. Prague: Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

DOLUNAY, Salih Kürşad, Hüseyin KARABUĞA & Ozan İPEK
2020. Türkçe Öğrenen Arap Öğrencilerin Biçimbilgisel İstem Yanlışları: Fiiller Üzerine Bir Sıklık Çalışması. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi 6:2 ► pp. 508 ff. DOI logo
Kolářová, Veronika, Anna Vernerová, Jana Klímová & Jan Kolář
2017. Possible but not probable :A quantitative analysis of valency behaviour of Czech nouns in the Prague Dependency Treebank. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 68:2 ► pp. 208 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.