Part of
Noun Valency
Edited by Olga Spevak
[Studies in Language Companion Series 158] 2014
► pp. 89112
References
Abney, Steven P
1987The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspects. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis
2001Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and Ergativity [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altshuler, Daniel G
2010Temporal Interpretation in Narrative Discourse and Event Internal Reference. Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
1997Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 73–117. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benedicto, Elena
1997The Syntax and Semantics of Non-canonical NP Positions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amherst.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Pancheva, Roumyana
2006Implicit arguments. In Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 2, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 558–588. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1999The form, the forming, and the formation of nominals. Ms, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
2005aStructuring Sense: An Exo-skeletal Trilogy, Vol. 1: In Name Only. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005bStructuring Sense: An Exo-skeletal trilogy, Vol. 2: The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1986Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1970Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham MA: Ginn & Company.Google Scholar
1980On binging. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 1–46.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, John Martin, David Michaels & Jane Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–53. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Daneš, František
1971Větné členy obligatorní, potenciální a fakultativní (Obligatory, potential, and facultative sentential constituents). In Miscellanea Linguistica, Miroslav Komárek (ed.), 131–138. Ostrava: Profil.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly
1992Indefinites. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly & Jelinek, Eloise
1995Distributing arguments. Natural Language Semantics 3(2): 123–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dočekal, Mojmír & Kučerová, Ivona
2010Aspectual presuppositions in Slavic and Romance. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 18: The Ithaca Meeting 2009, 125–139. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R
1979Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dvořák, Věra
2010On the syntax of ditransitive verbs in Czech. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 18: The Ithaca Meeting 2009, 161–177. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
2011Inherent case and locality requirement: Evidence from ditransitives and their nominalizations. In U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 17(1): Proceedings of PLC 34, 95–104. Philadelphia PA: Penn Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
2013When silent ‘something’ and silent ‘someone’ behave like mass nouns. Talk presented at RULing VIII, Rutgers University. [URL]
Filip, Hana
2003Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11(1): 55–101.Google Scholar
Fu, Jingqui, Roeper, Thomas & Borer, Hagit
2001The VP within process nominals: Evidence from adverbs and the VP anaphor do – so . Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 549–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, Berit
2008Goals and sources are aspectually equal: Evidence from Czech and Russian prefixes. Lingua 118: 1664–1689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1990Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1991Extended projection. Ms, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel J
1993On argument structure and lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvian Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jablońska, Patrycja
2007Radical Decomposition and Argument Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Karlík, Petr
2000Valence substantiv v modifikované valenční teorii (Valency of nouns in a modified valency theory). In Čeština – univerzália a specifika 2, Zdena Hladká & Petr Karlík (eds), 181–192. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita.Google Scholar
2002Ještě jednou k českým deverbálním substantivům (Once more on Czech deverbal nouns). In Čeština – univerzália a specifika 4, Zdena Hladká & Petr Karlík (eds), 13–23. Praha: Lidové noviny.Google Scholar
Kolářová, Veronika
2010Valence deverbativních substantiv v češtině (na materiálu substantiv s dativní valencí) (Valency of deverbal nouns in Czech, with a special regard to nouns with dative valency). Praha: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1996Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan
2010The explicit syntax of implicit arguments. Linguistic Inquiry 41(3): 357–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1993Implications of asymmetries in double object construction. In Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar, Sam Mchombo (ed.), 113–150. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
1997No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): Proceedings of PLC 21 , Alexis Dimitriadis (ed.), 201–225. Philadelphia PA: Penn Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
2007Phases and Words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, Sook-Hee Choe (ed.), 196–222. Seoul: Dong In.
McFadden, Thomas
2004The Position of Morphological Case in the Derivation: A Study on the Syntax–Morphology Interface. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Novotný, Jiří
1980Valence dějových substantiv v češtině (Valency of event nouns in Czech) [Sborník pedagogické fakulty v Ústí nad Labem]. Prague: SPN.Google Scholar
Panevová, Jarmila
1974On verbal frames in Functional Generative Description. Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 22, 3–40.Google Scholar
2000Poznámky k valenci podstatných jmen (Notes on the valency of nouns). In Čeština – univerzália a specifika 2, Zdena Hladká & Petr Karlík (eds), 173–180. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita.Google Scholar
Piťha, Petr
1992Posesívní vztah v češtině (Possessive Relation in Czech). Prague: Aved.Google Scholar
Procházková, Věra
2006Argument Structure of Czech Event Nominals. M.Phil. thesis, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2002Introducing Arguments. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2004Time and the event: The semantics of Russian prefixes. Nordlyd. Tromsø University Working Papers on Language and Linguistics 32(2): 323–361.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas & van Hout, Angeliek
1999The impact of nominalization on passive, -able and middle: Burzio’s generalization and feature-movement in the lexicon. In MITWPL 35: Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on the Lexicon, Liina Pylkkänen, Angeliek van Hout & Heidi Harley (eds), 185–211. Cambridge MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Romanova, Eugenia
2004Superlexical versus lexical prefixes. Nordlyd. Tromsø University Working Papers on Language and Linguistics 32(2): 255–278.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S
1991The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2004Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP. Nordlyd. Tromsø University Working papers on Language and Linguistics 32(2): 205–253.Google Scholar
Veselovská, Ludmila
2001K analýze českých deverbálních substantiv (On the analysis of Czech deverbal nouns). In Čeština – univerzália a specifika 3, Zdena Hladká & Petr Karlík (eds), 11–27. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita.Google Scholar
Zucchi, Alessandro
1989The Language of Propositions and Events: Issues in the Syntax and Semantics of Nominalization. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amherst.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kosta, Peter & Petr Karlík
2020. Die Nominalisierung von Nebensätzen im Tschechischen. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 65:4  pp. 479 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.