Part of
Noun Valency
Edited by Olga Spevak
[Studies in Language Companion Series 158] 2014
► pp. 113140
References (20)
References
Barbaud, Philippe. 1971. L’ambiguïté structurale du composé binominal. Cahiers de linguistique 1: 71–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2008. Dvandvas. Word Structure 1(1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Demonte, Violeta. 1999. Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (Descriptive grammar of Spanish language). Madrid: Real Academia Española, ESPASA.Google Scholar
Bouvier, Yves-Ferdinand. 2000. Définir les composés par opposition aux syntagmes. GG@G (Generative Grammar in Geneva) 1: 165–187. [URL]Google Scholar
Fried, Miriam & Östman, Jan-Ola. 2004. Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fradin, Bernard. 2009. IE, Romance: French. In Oxford Handbook on Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 417–435. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gushchina, Olga. 2008. Les constructions directes “substantif + substantif”. Le cas du nom propre. In Actes du CMLF 2008 – Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, Jacques Durand, Benoît Habert & Bernard Laks (eds), 2505–2518. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française.Google Scholar
Guțu-Romalo, Valeria. 2005. Gramatica limbii române, Vol. II: Enunțul (Grammar of Romanian Language, Vol. II: The Sentence). Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas. 1999. English valency structures – a first sketch. Erfurt Electronic Studies in English 6. [URL]Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mathieu-Colas, Michel. 1995. Syntaxe du trait d’union: Structures complexes. Linguisticae Investigationes 19(1): 153–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyers, Adam, Macleod, Catherine & Grishman, Ralph. 1996. Standardization of the complement adjunct distinction. In Euralex ‘96. Proceedings , Martin Gellerstam, Jerker Järborg, Sven-Göran Malmgren, Kerstin Norén, Lena Rogström & Catarina Röjder Papmehl (eds), 141–150. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University, Department of Swedish.Google Scholar
Noailly, Michèle. 1990. Le substantif épithète. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
. To appear. Les séquences nom-nom. In La grande grammaire du français, Anne Abeillé, Danièle Godard & Anne Delaveau (eds). Arles: Actes Sud.
Olsen, Susan. 2001. Copulative compounds: A closer look at the interface between syntax and morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 2000, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 279–320. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Coordination in morphology and syntax. The case of copulative compounds. In The Composition of Meaning. From Lexeme to Discourse [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 255], Alice ter Meulen & Werner Abraham (eds), 17–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara & Borschev, Vladimir. 2012. Sortal, relational, and functional interpretations of nouns and Russian container constructions. Journal of Semantics, 29: 445–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ZiareRom. [URL]