Article published in:
Noun Valency
Edited by Olga Spevak
[Studies in Language Companion Series 158] 2014
► pp. 161182
Alexiadou, Artemis
2001Adjective syntax and noun raising: Word order asymmetries in the DP as the result of adjective distribution. Studia Linguistica 55: 217–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1984COMP in Bavarian syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina
2000Some issues in the syntax of relative determiners. In The Syntax of Relative Clauses [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 32], Artemis Alexiadou, Paul Law, André Meinunger & Chris Wilder (eds), 53–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
2008More on the indefinite character of the head of restrictive relatives. Rivista di grammatica generativa 33: 3–24.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2011Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: ihre Distribution und Lizenzierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen [Studia Grammatica 73]. Berlin: Akademie-Verl. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egg, Markus
2007The syntax and semantics of relative clause modification. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands , Khal’il Simanan, Maarten de Rijke, Remko Scha & Rob van Son (eds), 49–56. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
1979Appositive relatives have no properties. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 1–25.Google Scholar
Fabb, Nigel
1989The difference between English restrictive and nonrestrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26: 57–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine
2009Überlegungen zur pränominalen Nicht-Restriktivität. In Koordination und Subordination im Deutschen [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 16], Veronika Ehrich, Christian Fortmann, Ingo Reich & Marga Reis (eds), 89–112. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert
2001Features, theta-roles, and free constituent order, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 405‒436.Google Scholar
Felix, Sascha
1985Parasitic gaps in German. In Erklärende Syntax des Deutschen, Werner Abraham (ed.), 173–200. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2002Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of CP. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2: 117–180.Google Scholar
2004aTopicalization, CLLD and the left periphery. In Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop vol. 1 [ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35], Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 157–192. Berlin: ZAS.Google Scholar
2004bThe syntax of adverbial clauses and its consequences for topicalization. In Current Studies in Comparative Romance Linguistics [Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 107], Martine Coene, Gretel De Cuyper, Yves D’Hulst (eds), 61–90. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
2006Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116: 1651–1669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua 120: 628-648. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert
1997Extraposition. In Rightward Movement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 17], Dorothee Beerman, David LeBlanc & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 115–151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax [Linguistic inquiry Monographs 25]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Meinunger, André
2000Syntactic Aspects of Topic and Comment [Lingustik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 38]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer
2000A complement of n° account of restrictive and non-restrictive relatives: The case of Swedish. In The Syntax of Relative Clauses [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 32], Artemis Alexiadou, Paul Law, André Meinunger & Chris Wilder (eds), 309–348. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M
1994Parasitic and pseudoparasitic gaps. Linguistic Inquiry 25(1): 63–117.Google Scholar
Resi, Rossella
2011The position of relative clauses in German. Lingue e Linguaggio 1: 87–118.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. A Handbook of Generative Grammar [Kluwer International Handbooks of Linguistics 1], Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
2001On the position Int(errogative) in the left periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi [North-Holland Linguistic Series: Linguistic Variations 59], Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2004Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3], Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sabel, Joachim
1996Asymmetries partial wh-movement. In Papers on Wh-Scope Marking [Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, 76], Uli Lutz & Gereon Müller (eds), 289–315. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Thurmair, Maria
1989Modalpartikeln in ihre Kombination [Linguistische Arbeiten 223]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Umbach, Carla
2006Non-restrictive modification and backgrounding. In Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on Logic and Language , Beáta Gyuris László Kálmán, Chris Piñón & Károly Varasdi (eds), 152–159, Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1980Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–238.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2004Discourse particles in the left periphery. In Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop , Vol. 2 [ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35], Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 254–566, Berlin: ZAS.Google Scholar
Ziv, Yael & Cole, Paul
1974Relative extraposition and the scope of definite description in Hebrew and English. In Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , April 19-21, Michael W. La Galy, Robert A. Fox & Anthony Bruck (eds), 772–786. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar