Part of
Contact, Variation, and Change in the History of English
Edited by Simone E. Pfenninger, Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja, Marianne Hundt and Daniel Schreier
[Studies in Language Companion Series 159] 2014
► pp. 3960
References (26)
References
Akaike, Hirotugu. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 22: 47–76.Google Scholar
Bech, Kristin. 2000/2001. Word Order Patterns in Old and Middle English: A Syntactic and Pragmatic Study. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Edward Finegan. 2004. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, 4th improved edn. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Breivik, Leiv E. 2002. Old English þa revisited. InLanguage and Function [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 49], Josef Hladký (ed.), 39–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. 2006. Pathways in the development of pragmatic markers in English. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 307-334. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua 114: 683-710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daron, Carol F. 1974. The Position of Adverbials in a Selected Corpus of Early Old English Prose. PhD dissertation, Auburn University. Ann Arbor MI: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Davis, Graeme. 2006. Comparative Syntax of Old English and Old Icelandic. Linguistic, Literary and Historical Implications [Studies in Historical Linguistics 1]. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1972. Old English adverbial þa – An action marker? In Studies Presented to Tauno F. Mustanoja on his Sixtieth Birthday. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 73: 90–96.Google Scholar
. 1986. More about the textual functions of the Old English adverbial þa . In Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries. In Honour of Jacek Fisiak, Vol. I: Linguistic Theory, Dieter Kastovsky & Aleksander Szwedek (eds), 301-310. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2004. Principles of adverbial distribution in the lower clause. Lingua 114: 755-777. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga & van der Wurff, Wim. 2008[2006]. Syntax. In A History of the English Language, Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds), 109-198. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner & Karin Pittner. 1999. Adverbialpositionen im deutsch-englischen Vergleich. In Sprachspezifische Aspekte der Informationsverteilung, Monika Doherty (ed.), 14-40. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 2000. Adverb placement convergence of structure and licensing. Theoretical Linguistics 26: 95-134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Pre- and postverbal adverbials in OV and VO. Lingua 114: 779-804. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde. 2010. Adjunct Adverbials in English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2000. The relative order of prepositional phrases in English: Going beyond manner – place – time. Language Variation and Change 11: 231–266.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1999. The word orders of English and Dutch. Collective vs. individual checking. In Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik, Werner Abraham (ed.), 1-42. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English Syntax, Vol. II: Subordination, independent elements and element order. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pittner, Karin. 1995. Valenz und Relevanz – eine informationsstrukturelle Erklärung für ‘obligatorische‘ Adverbiale. In Beiträge zu Sprache und Sprachen. Vorträge der 4. Münchner Linguistik-Tage der Gesellschaft für Sprache und Sprachen (GESUS) e.V., Robert J. Pittner & Karin Pittner (eds), 95–106. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sydney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wårvik, Brita. 2011. Connective or ‘disconnective’ discourse marker? Old English þa, multifunctionality and narrative structuring. In Connectives in Synchrony and Diachrony in European Languages [Varieng 8], Anneli Meurman-Solin & Ursula Lenker (eds). [URL].Google Scholar
YCOE The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. Ann Taylor, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Frank Beths. . 2003. Department of Language and Linguistic Science. University of York. [URL]Google Scholar