Cover not available
Part of
Contact, Variation, and Change in the History of English
Edited by Simone E. Pfenninger, Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja, Marianne Hundt and Daniel Schreier
[Studies in Language Companion Series 159] 2014
► pp. 259–280

The subjunctive mood in Philippine English

A diachronic analysis

| De La Salle University, Manila
| De La Salle University, Manila
ORCID logo | De La Salle University, Manila
American English has been observed to be leading the way in the revival of the (mandative) subjunctive, leaving behind British English and its postcolonial “children”. Drawing on data from two sets of corpora, sampled in the 1960s and the 1990s, this paper examines the extent to which Philippine English, a distinctively American-rooted variety, has been following American patterns in its use of the subjunctive (both the mandative and the hypothetical were-subjunctive). Some of the findings reflect the historical exonormative dependence of Philippine English on its American “parent” (notably, its continuing preference for the subjunctive over should-periphrasis, and its dispreference for the indicative, in mandative constructions), while others reflect its evolutionary progression towards endonormative stability (for example its disregard for American maintenance of the traditional formality connotations of the mandative subjunctive, and for the American preference for subjunctive were over indicative was in subordinate counterfactual clauses).
Published online: 11 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.159.13col
References (30)
References
Bautista, Ma. Lourdes S. 2004. The verb in Philippine English: A preliminary analysis of the modal would . World Englishes 23(1):113–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Exemplary analyses of the Philippine English corpus. In Piakandatu ami Dr Howard P. McKaughan(In Honour of Dr Howard P. McKaughan), Loren Billings & Nelleke Goudswaard (eds), 5–23. Manila: Linguistics Society of the Philippines and SIL Philippines.Google Scholar
. 2010. Comparing spoken and written text types in Singapore English and Philippine English. In Inter/Sections: Isagani R. Cruz and Friends, David Jonathan Y. Bayot (ed.), 175–200. Manila: Anvil.Google Scholar
. 2011. Introducing the Philippine component of the International Corpus of English circa 2010. In Studies of Philippine English: Exploring the Philippine Component of the International Corpus of English, Ma. Lourdes S. Bautista (ed.), 3–22. Manila: Anvil.Google Scholar
Bevier, Thyra Jane. 1931. American use of the subjunctive. American Speech 6(3):207–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borlongan, Ariane Macalinga. 2009. A survey on language use, attitudes, and identity in relation to Philippine English among young generation Filipinos: An initial sample from a private university. The Philippine ESL Journal 3:74–107.Google Scholar
. 2011. Relocating Philippine English in Schneider’s dynamic model. Paper presented at the 17th International Association of World Englishes Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
Borlongan, Ariane Macalinga & Lim, Joo-Hyuk. 2012. Distinctive grammatical features of Philippine English: A meta-synthesis of corpus-based studies. Poster presented at the 33rd International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English (ICAME) Conference, Louvain, Belgium.
Collins, Peter. 2009. Extended uses of would in some Asian Englishes. Asian Englishes 12(2):34–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter, Borlongan, Ariane & Yao, Xinyue. 2014Modality in Philippine English: A diachronic study.Journal of English Linguistics42(1): 68–88. DOI logo
Depraetere, Ilse & Reed, Susan. 2006. Mood and modality in English. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds), 269–290. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deuber, Dagmar, Biewer, Carolin, Hackert, Stephanie & Hilbert, Michaela. 2012. Will and would in selected New Englishes: General and variety-specific tendencies. In Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide [Varieties of English around the World G43], Marianne Hundt & Ulrike Gut (eds), 77–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Henry. 1926. A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gonzales, Andrew. 1997. Philippine English: A variety in search of legitimation. In Englishes Around the World. Studies in Honour of Manfred Görlach, Vol.2 [Varieties of English around the World G19], Edgar Schneider (ed.), 205–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harsh, Wayne. 1968. The Subjunctive in English. Tuscaloosa AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 1998a. It is important that this study (should) be based on the analysis of parallel corpora: On the use of the mandative subjunctive in four major varieties of English. In The Major Varieties of English (Papers from MAVEN 1997), Hans Lindquist, Staffan Klintborg, Magnus Levin & Maria Estling (eds), 159–175. Vaxjo: Acta Wexionensia.Google Scholar
. 1998b. New Zealand English Grammar: Fact or Fiction? [Varieties of English around the World G23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Colonial lag, colonial innovation, or simply language change? In One Language, Two Grammars, Gunter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 13–37. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, Hoffmann, Sebastian & Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2012. The hypothetical subjunctive in South Asian Englishes: Local developments in the use of a global construction. English World-Wide 33(2):147–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Stig & Norheim, Else Helene. 1988. The subjunctive in British and American English. ICAME Journal 12: 27–36.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English . A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Övergaard, Gerd. 1995. The Mandative Subjunctive in American and British English in the 20th Century. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Peters, Pam. 1998. The survival of the subjunctive: Evidence of its use in Australia and elsewhere. English World-Wide 19: 87–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. The mandative subjunctive in spoken English. In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English around the World G39], Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds), 125–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2000. Corpus linguistics in the Asian context: Exemplary analyses of the Kolhapur Corpus of Indian English. In Parangol Cang Brother Andrew: Festschrift for Andrew Gonzalez on His Sixtieth Birthday, Ma. Lourdes S. Bautista, Teodoro A. Llamzon & Bonifacio P. Sibayan (eds), 115–137. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar
. 2005. The subjunctive in Philippine English. In Linguistics and Language Education in the Philippines and Beyond: A Festschrift in Honor of Ma. Lourdes S Bautista, Danilo T. Dayag & Stephen Quackenbush (eds), 27–40. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar
. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The subjunctive in Philippine English: An updated assessment. In Studies of Philippine English: Exploring the Philippine Component of the International Corpus of English, Ma. Lourdes S. Bautista (ed.), 159–173. Manila: Anvil.Google Scholar
Svalberg, Agneta M.-L. 1998. Nativization in Brunei English: Deviation vs. standard. World Englishes 17(3): 325–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Schmidt, Karola & Nina Funke
2024. Exploration of the mandative subjunctive in Pakistani English. World Englishes DOI logo
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
2023. Broadening horizons in the diachronic and sociolinguistic study of Philippine English with the Twitter Corpus of Philippine Englishes (TCOPE). English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 44:3 ► pp. 403 ff. DOI logo
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
2024. The Holistic Advantage: Unified Quantitative Modeling for Less-Biased, In-Depth Insights into (Socio)Linguistic Variation. Languages 9:5 ► pp. 182 ff. DOI logo
Collins, Peter & Xinyue Yao
2019. AusBrown: A new diachronic corpus of Australian English. ICAME Journal 43:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Borlongan, Ariane Macalinga
2016. Relocating Philippine English in Schneider’s dynamic model. Asian Englishes 18:3 ► pp. 232 ff. DOI logo
Borlongan, Ariane Macalinga & Shirley N. Dita
2015. Taking a look at expanded predicates in Philippine English across time. Asian Englishes 17:3 ► pp. 240 ff. DOI logo
Collins, Peter
2015. Recent diachronic change in the progressive in Philippine English. In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 67], ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Collins, Peter
2023. Grammatical variation in World Englishes. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 44:2 ► pp. 184 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.